In the HTML output, every field should be enclosed in an appropriate CSS class. This would ease a lot defining a custom layout. For example, given the bibtex entry:
@Book{texbook,
author = "Donald E. Knuth",
title= "The {{\TeX}book}",
publisher = "Addison-Wesley",
year = 1984
}The desired output HTML would be something like:
<dl>
<dt>
[<a name="texbook">1</a>]
</dt>
<dd class="Book">
<span class="author">Donald E. Knuth</span>.
<span class="title">The TeXbook.</span>
<span class="publisher">Addison-Wesley</span>, <span
class="year">2005</span>.<br>
<pre class="bibtex" id="texbook">
@BookK{texbook,
author = "Donald E. Knuth",
title= "The {{\TeX}book}",
publisher = "Addison-Wesley",
year = 1984
}
</pre>
</dd>
</dl>The <span>, class and id tags don't do anything by themselves. However, they allow to modify the layout easily using CSS. For example, I would be able to use something like this:
.author {
font-weight: bold;
}
.title {
font-variant: italic;
}
pre.bibtex {
overflow: auto; /* if larger than maximum width, will produce scrollbars */
}Moreover, implementing layout properties of different bibliographic styles will be rather straightforward since the CSS can be embedded in the header of the html file.
In the HTML output, every field should be enclosed in an appropriate CSS class. This would ease a lot defining a custom layout. For example, given the bibtex entry:
The desired output HTML would be something like:
The
<span>, class and id tags don't do anything by themselves. However, they allow to modify the layout easily using CSS. For example, I would be able to use something like this:Moreover, implementing layout properties of different bibliographic styles will be rather straightforward since the CSS can be embedded in the header of the html file.