I see that the BAS source code (bas-template-bsc and bas-genesis-config) has 2 major branches: master and devel. The devel branch is far ahead from the master branch. It looks like you would eventually merge devel to master, right?
I know I could just use the master branch as it is the convention, but I see that this repo has an audit report from Certik and it is likely that all audit fixes are done in audit-fixes branch which is only merged to devel (w3tech/bas-template-bsc#18). Also, I notice that there is another audit-fixes branch which is merged to master (w3tech/bas-template-bsc#8).
So which branch should I use? Would it be better to use the devel branch which includes latest audit fixes?
I see that the BAS source code (bas-template-bsc and bas-genesis-config) has 2 major branches: master and devel. The devel branch is far ahead from the master branch. It looks like you would eventually merge devel to master, right?
I know I could just use the master branch as it is the convention, but I see that this repo has an audit report from Certik and it is likely that all audit fixes are done in audit-fixes branch which is only merged to devel (w3tech/bas-template-bsc#18). Also, I notice that there is another audit-fixes branch which is merged to master (w3tech/bas-template-bsc#8).
So which branch should I use? Would it be better to use the devel branch which includes latest audit fixes?