[C6 HL-043] Govern portfolio reuse and product or organization graduation #53

Outcome

Grow a repository family or organization only when real operating boundaries exist.

Placement and activation

• Circle: C6 — Sustainable commercial and institutional operation
• System responsibilities: Corporate / Platform
• Capability coverage: 00 Product Constitution & Governance; 09 Developer Platform & Tooling; 16 Meta / Portfolio Orchestration
• Planning status: Conditional; activate only when the requirement below is met.
• Activation: Multiple maintained components or an actual independent operating/governance requirement exists.
• Parent epic: [EPIC C6] Sustainable commercial and institutional operation #9; master roadmap: [MASTER EPIC] Hole-loop: concentric evolution within Persona / Visual Form Canon #2.

Dependencies

Required prerequisites:

• HL-004 #13: current capability/component/repository/deployable map, an evidenced boundary, and separate commercial-function/process/system-of-record map.
• HL-045 #14: source custody, Persona ownership, and inspected sibling reuse boundaries.
• Named continuing owners, maintained consumer/deployment evidence, versioned composition contracts, and the migration/rollback plan for the proposed change.

Conditional dependencies:

• HL-030 #40 applies when extracting the shared composition engine; its two-real-consumer rule applies to a new shared typography/composition library.
• HL-036 #46 applies when multiple maintained components need shared developer tooling or compatibility infrastructure.
• HL-042 #52 supplies the cost/capacity/migration assessment before a dedicated organization or independently funded operation is proposed.
• HL-041 #51 supplies applicable independent governance, permission, contracting, or corporate responsibility decisions.

A repository-family review need not introduce engine extraction, hosted services, or monetization. Dedicated-organization graduation still requires sustained independent ownership/governance, active maintenance and delivery capacity, and a concrete cost/migration plan.

Acceptance evidence

• Maintain Enterprise → Product → Systems → Components → Repositories → Deployables → Runtime resources, plus a separate commercial functions → processes → automation → systems-of-record map.
• Review candidate core/web/api/data/integrations/sdk/admin/infra/evals/docs/ops extractions against independent lifecycle/deploy/permission/ownership/reuse/distinct-concern evidence.
• Require named owner, real consumers, contracts and version compatibility, release/evaluation gates, migration and rollback before every extraction.
• Graduate to a dedicated organization only with sustained product ownership, real independent access/governance needs, active delivery and maintenance capacity, and a cost/migration plan.
• Record reuse boundaries with SIMVLTANEA, audiovisual composition, education and knowledge/source systems; source custody and product identity remain explicit.
• Preserve independent work identities in the Persona canon. Do not equate persona-fleet with the art project space or claim a research/prototype repository implements Floating Points, svb-obj, or Narcissus without a current ownership/source record.

Completion and scope

Attach the actual artifact or commit, relevant verification, limitations, and an artist decision where a composition changes. This issue plans authorized work; creation does not claim implementation or deployment. Preserve independent work/source identities and private source boundaries. Repository creation requires the extraction evidence in HL-004 #13 and HL-045 #14.