Skip to content

docs: mark launch tokenomics TBD before launch - #4

Open
SaulBuilds wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/tokenomics-tbd-current
Open

SaulBuilds wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/tokenomics-tbd-current

Conversation

@SaulBuilds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Launch tokenomics remain TBD before launch. Update current references to point to https://docs.citrate.ai/chain/economics and support@citrate.ai, with more announcements coming soon. Earlier exploratory figures must not be presented as finalized launch terms.

Economic simulations, their assumptions/results, runtime economic parameters, and historical audit records are preserved. No contract or chain configuration changes.

Validation: reviewed scoped diffs and git diff --check. Editorial changes only; no full runtime test suite claimed.

Federation workstream: .agentile/sprints/active/2026-11-04-tokenomics-tbd.md in citrate-federation. No attempt to amend signed agreements or erase historical records.

@SaulBuilds
SaulBuilds requested a review from a team as a code owner November 4, 2026 22:28

@BerryManifold BerryManifold left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated Codex static review of 9efc4932155e77d600f698bfc9de227195dcbd2f is complete. Result: clean; details retained privately. Details and coverage limits are recorded in the project's private review log. No tests were executed by this reviewer. Both account submissions represent the same Codex review, not independent reviews.

@Matr0xshka Matr0xshka left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated Codex static review of 9efc4932155e77d600f698bfc9de227195dcbd2f is complete. Result: clean; details retained privately. Details and coverage limits are recorded in the project's private review log. No tests were executed by this reviewer. Both account submissions represent the same Codex review, not independent reviews.

@Matr0xshka Matr0xshka left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[MAC independent review] APPROVED at 9efc493.

Scope verified prose-only: TBD banners on ADR-0007, PLANSET 00/08, docs/SETTLEMENT_SEAM.md and paper/07_federated.md, plus three wording swaps from "tokenomics" to "experimental settlement/policy; launch tokenomics TBD". No crate, test or formal-model changes. The reward_weight = compute x quality engineering definition is untouched.

Banners carry the docs.citrate.ai/chain/economics link and support@citrate.ai. CI (ci, secret-scan, CodeQL) is green. Blocked only on the required review.

Non-blocking (P3): paper/07 line 68 reads a little awkwardly ("payout under experimental policy; launch tokenomics TBD, and ContributionAccounting records it"). Parentheses would read better.

House rules checked on added lines: no new em-dashes, no "dogfood", no "HITL"; no citrate.ai / citrate-landing surface touched. Do not merge on this review alone; owner merges. The same MAC review is posted from both reviewer accounts (one reviewer, not two).

@BerryManifold BerryManifold left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[MAC independent review] APPROVED at 9efc493.

Scope verified prose-only: TBD banners on ADR-0007, PLANSET 00/08, docs/SETTLEMENT_SEAM.md and paper/07_federated.md, plus three wording swaps from "tokenomics" to "experimental settlement/policy; launch tokenomics TBD". No crate, test or formal-model changes. The reward_weight = compute x quality engineering definition is untouched.

Banners carry the docs.citrate.ai/chain/economics link and support@citrate.ai. CI (ci, secret-scan, CodeQL) is green. Blocked only on the required review.

Non-blocking (P3): paper/07 line 68 reads a little awkwardly ("payout under experimental policy; launch tokenomics TBD, and ContributionAccounting records it"). Parentheses would read better.

House rules checked on added lines: no new em-dashes, no "dogfood", no "HITL"; no citrate.ai / citrate-landing surface touched. Do not merge on this review alone; owner merges. The same MAC review is posted from both reviewer accounts (one reviewer, not two).

@SaulBuilds
SaulBuilds enabled auto-merge (squash) November 7, 2026 23:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants