Skip to content

docs(gaps): refresh exact-head Voice delivery evidence - #1181

Open
seonghobae wants to merge 11 commits into
mainfrom
codex/gap-baseline-20261018
Open

seonghobae wants to merge 11 commits into
mainfrom
codex/gap-baseline-20261018

Conversation

@seonghobae

@seonghobae seonghobae commented Oct 18, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Scope

Refresh the product and technical gap baseline against protected main after #1179 merged. Record the exact current heads for #1177 and #1178, the Actions billing lock on #1177, current ruleset limits, the selected Voice reader candidate, and the remaining authenticated and load acceptance gaps.

Verification

Delivery limits

No authenticated PostgreSQL/API or synthetic k6 capacity acceptance is claimed. The active main policy currently lacks required independent-review and successful-check rules, so this PR must not merge or auto-merge until those protections and current-head evidence are in place.


Devin Review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 문서
    • 2026-10-18~19 기준의 최신 상태 기록을 갱신하고, PR·브랜치 보호 상태와 검증 범위를 반영했습니다.
    • Voice 지원 불가 안내 UI 후보의 동작과 테스트 결과, Board 필터 쿼리의 관찰값 및 후보 측정값을 기록했습니다.
    • 인증된 API·렌더링 수용 증거와 최신 부하 측정이 없는 항목은 미완료 또는 미측정으로 명시했습니다.
    • 기존 18:08 기록 제목을 21:50으로 변경하고, 10-19 02:40 스냅샷을 갱신했습니다.

2026-10-19 exact-head follow-up

The baseline now records the verified current main SHA, 196 open PRs, 43 open issues, current #1177/#1178/#1182 heads, the active no-force-push-only ruleset, and the unresolved #1181 delivery-gate thread. Three focused authenticated PostgreSQL/API Voice tests passed. An authenticated synthetic-workload k6 observation identified PostgreSQL Board work as the measured bottleneck; #1182 contains the distinct filter-query repair and its ADR 0212 amendment. The running Compose image has not been tied to that candidate head, and rendered Voice acceptance remains open. Documentation hygiene passed (6 tests), and git diff --check passed. This new documentation head invalidates prior hosted-check evidence.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 18, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review in Change Stack →

Note

Reviews paused

It looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the reviews.auto_review.auto_pause_after_reviewed_commits setting.

Use the following commands to manage reviews:

  • @coderabbitai resume to resume automatic reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a single review.

Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:

  • ▶️ Resume reviews
  • 🔍 Trigger review

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Organization UI
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 35344bec-c773-40c0-a40b-88727e3c62b9
📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4b15fa4 and 81383b0.

📒 Files selected for processing: 1
  • docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

📝 Walkthrough

기준선 문서에 2026-10-18~19 기록을 추가하고 기존 기록을 갱신했습니다. 저장소와 PR 상태, Voice 후보 동작 및 검증 범위, 미완료 수용 증거와 부하 측정 한계를 기록했습니다.

Changes: 기준선 문서 갱신

Layer / File(s) Summary
감사 기록 및 후보 상태 갱신
docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md
날짜별 main 및 PR 상태, 후보 동작과 검증 결과를 갱신했습니다. Voice 후보의 지원 불가 상태 처리와 미완료 수용 증거를 기록했습니다. 인증된 부하 측정 및 용량·포화 관측이 없음을 명시하고 기존 기록 제목을 갱신했습니다.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Change: Other

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 81383

The cited line is prose referring to PR #1177, not a heading. No actionable merge-blocking risk remains in the reviewed changes.

Pre-merge checks: Passed 5
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check Passed 제목은 제품 및 기술 갭 기준 문서에서 exact-head Voice 전달 증거를 갱신하는 주요 변경을 정확하게 설명합니다.
Docstring Coverage Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches: 💡 1
🛠️ Fix failing CI checks: 💡
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Devin Review found 1 potential issue.

Devin Review

Comment on lines +23 to +31
independent approval or auto-merge request. Each has four terminal failed
hosted jobs on its own head. The #1177 Full test job ran zero steps; its
exact-head annotation says the Actions account is locked for billing, so it
provides no test result. The #1178 static-page review finding was addressed
in its current code; the remaining repository-name privacy suggestion
misreads ADR 0001's source-record boundary. #1177's repository-name finding
has the same problem. The active `main` ruleset prohibits force pushes only,
and classic branch protection returns 404. It does not enforce independent
approval or successful Checks; an auto-merge request could merge immediately,

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔍 Delivery gates remain open

The baseline records failed hosted jobs and absent independent approvals for both feature heads. It also records that main does not enforce either gate. Confirm the required protections and current-head evidence before merging this documentation update.

Devin Review


Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant