π¨ Palette: μμ΄μ½ μ μ© λ²νΌμ title μμ± μΆκ° - #911
π¨ Palette: μμ΄μ½ μ μ© λ²νΌμ title μμ± μΆκ°#911seonghobae wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
|
π Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a π emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 22 minutes Limit details: Youβve used all 1 included review currently available under your plan. You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review detailsβοΈ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: β Files ignored due to path filters (1)
π Files selected for processing (6)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
1 participant
μ κ·Όμ±κ³Ό μ¬μ©μ κ²½νμ ν₯μμν€κΈ° μν΄, aria-labelκ³Ό λμΌν title μμ±μ μμ΄μ½ μ μ© λ²νΌ(Zoom, Page Navigation, Remove)μ μΆκ°νμ¬ λ§μ°μ€ νΈλ² μ λ€μ΄ν°λΈ ν΄νμ΄ νμλλλ‘ κ°μ νμ΅λλ€.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 1033031934119898546 started by @seonghobae
Superseded after exact-head review
Closed as superseded rather than merged.
deebd55452202419d892bb38bbf6e4ac612a66d8against protecteddevelop@acdbea6344fe1231c39535b575f4de35e4c607c9.ScoreView.tsxandScoreViewer.tsx, together with their tests, are already owned by canonical accessibility PR π¨ Palette: ν₯μλ μ κ·Όμ±μ μν΄ μμ΄μ½ λ²νΌμ ν΄ν λ° aria-disabled μ μ©Β #731 at exact head81cc280be112c601002067d76412b33fdb6fed4e; π¨ Palette: ν₯μλ μ κ·Όμ±μ μν΄ μμ΄μ½ λ²νΌμ ν΄ν λ° aria-disabled μ μ©Β #731 also preserves disabled-state discoverability with localized recovery hints and covers the fit-width icon control, so this PR adds no unique product behavior that should be kept in a second lane.pdfjs-distmanifest/lock change and broad npm lock metadata churn. That authority belongs to canonical dependency-security PR fix(security): establish canonical npm, PDF.js, Nanoid, and Undici baselineΒ #783, not this accessibility lane.security-auditrun32099984715, job95598503717, failed atnpm audit --workspaces --audit-level=highonnanoid <3.3.18andundici 7.0.0-7.28.0, demonstrating that the partial dependency mutation did not establish the canonical security baseline.No checks, reviews, or dependency evidence from this superseded branch should transfer to #731 or #783. Unique product work is preserved in #731; dependency-security work remains in #783.