[seonghobae]

💡 What: GroupModal.tsx 내의 색상 스와치 버튼들이 role="radio"와 aria-checked를 사용하도록 수정했습니다.
🎯 Why: 부모 요소가 role="radiogroup"을 사용하고 있지만 자식들이 라디오 역할을 명시적으로 가지고 있지 않아 발생하는 스크린 리더 접근성 문제를 해결하기 위함입니다.
📸 Before/After: 시각적 변화 없음. HTML 어트리뷰트 변경.
♿ Accessibility: 스크린 리더 사용자들이 라디오 그룹의 각 항목과 선택 여부를 명확히 인식할 수 있게 되었습니다.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 8109625238567014738 started by @seonghobae

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 16 seconds

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: a33eacc9-ed54-46c3-96b8-9b9c548b713f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 72afe6d and 6680f2d.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• .jules/palette.md
• frontend/src/components/modals/GroupModal.tsx
• frontend/src/components/modals/ModalCoverage.test.tsx
• frontend/src/styles.css

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[seonghobae]

Closing as a strict subset of #730. This branch adds only role="radio" and aria-checked, but leaves every swatch in the tab sequence and omits the required arrow-key movement/wrapping behavior for a custom radio group. #730 implements the complete roving-tabindex keyboard contract, click/Space behavior, unknown-selection fallback, focused regressions, and accessibility evidence. No review or check evidence from this head transfers.

[google-labs-jules]

Closing as a strict subset of #730. This branch adds only role="radio" and aria-checked, but leaves every swatch in the tab sequence and omits the required arrow-key movement/wrapping behavior for a custom radio group. #730 implements the complete roving-tabindex keyboard contract, click/Space behavior, unknown-selection fallback, focused regressions, and accessibility evidence. No review or check evidence from this head transfers.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete as it is a strict subset of PR #730, and stopping work on this task.