Skip to content

feat(core): deterministic list_users and control char path validation - #416

Open
Cylae wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
jules-5992953717060295136-253661ac
Open

feat(core): deterministic list_users and control char path validation#416
Cylae wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
jules-5992953717060295136-253661ac

Conversation

@Cylae

@Cylae Cylae commented Sep 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Enhanced deterministic ordering in list_users and tightened path validation against control characters/NUL bytes, accompanied by unit tests.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 5992953717060295136 started by @Cylae

- Updated `UserManager::list_users` to preallocate capacity and sort users deterministically by username.
- Enhanced `validate_safe_path` to reject path inputs containing NUL bytes or ASCII control characters.
- Added comprehensive unit tests in `users.rs` and `contract_input_validation.rs`.
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant