Skip to content

Fix UOM/quantity mismatches in 2.6 pore-pressure dissipation examples (dictionary check 12) #4

Description

@xinp-hub

Summary

Official DIGGS 2.6 pore-pressure dissipation examples fail dictionary check 12 (UOM not valid for the property's quantity class). The 3.0 counterpart already encodes the correct units.

Affected files

  • PorePressureDissipationOnly.xml (2.6)
  • PorePressureDissipation.xml (2.6)
  • CPT_and_PorePressureDissipation.xml (2.6)

Suggested fixes

Property Current <uom> Expected (quantity class)
#t50 kPa s (time)
#coef_consolidation_horiz cm2/m cm2/min (area per time)

Reference already-correct 3.0 instance: PorePressureDissipation_Example.xml (s / cm2/min).

Context

Tracked downstream in xinp-hub/pydiggs#220. pydiggs currently surfaces check 12 as a WARNING so official goldens still pass dictionary_check().

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions