Repository navigation
Add structured JSON output for automation - #9
Merged
Merged
Conversation
HoungDev
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 7, 2026 03:12
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Why
Creator workflows often need to pass CLI results into scripts and CI pipelines. Human-oriented
text is useful interactively but difficult to parse reliably. A versioned envelope and stable
exit-code contract make the toolkit composable without weakening the safe confirmation behavior
added to file operations.
User impact
--jsonto any scriptable subcommand.--dry-runor--yes.Validation
ruff check .ruff format --check .pytest— 44 passed, 93.79% coveragepython -m build --no-isolationpython -m twine checkdocs/json-output.mdis included in the sdistpython -m pip_audit— no known vulnerabilitiespython -m pip checkCloses #4