[Dong1017]

Refs #91.

The existing TensorRT-LLM-derived performance methods and PD/KV-transfer card have separate entrypoints without a shared scope map. Add reciprocal library, knowledge-pack and matrix navigation, with an assessment of the measurement assumptions across all five resource axes. Readers can distinguish startup and per-request costs, local H2D and network transfer, and component evidence and service-level comparisons.

Retain the methodology's original prefix precision: f33e0e5f in procedures, f33e0e5fd in the matrix and f33e0e5fd55b in ceiling metadata. Its original inspection date is not individually recorded. The peer card retains c9b18eefa731dc59b0091bdfff6d890aa9d1e98e, accessed 2026-10-15, and its technical-document / upstream-reported / imported-unverified state. Mixed-source attribution, notices, detailed procedures, metadata, readsets and candidate / empirical not_run states remain unchanged.

Validation at final head 3140fba53dd8c0264d32dd17de2fb5b0a4882ca0:

• Four existing Markdown files add 51 lines. Removing the insertion blocks restores their original bytes; all other main entries are unchanged. Static checks cover 310 local links, 36 anchors and the six-row assessment table.
• All 254 registered inputs and 60 managed projection files retain their bytes. One stock --check passed at retained projection source 05fae2814158a9b59416b3f1e99371d0d171ff84; no regeneration was required.
• Actual package access resolves eight registered method IDs and the peer ID, with 25 revision/hash-bound resource API reads and two native package-file reads. Peer material/resource access succeeds; opt-in context retains its expected unsupported_context boundary. The registered host-profiling context returns its exact 11,199-byte core.
• Independent fixed-head review by gpt-6.1-sol / xhigh found no issues in the source-supported assessment, preservation or resource-receipt scope. The reviewer supplied no material content.

CI results appear in the PR checks. Repository-wide declaration-scan failures are tracked in #140. These navigation and package checks do not establish cross-pin runtime compatibility, backend/model execution, performance or agent efficacy.

{
  "schema_version": 1,
  "head_sha": "3140fba53dd8c0264d32dd17de2fb5b0a4882ca0",
  "human_only": false,
  "material_ai_authors": [
    {
      "tool": "Codex",
      "model_id": "gpt-6.1-sol",
      "effort": "xhigh",
      "role": "author"
    }
  ]
}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-25T04:15:19.313151Z	3140fba	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[Dong1017]

Scoped LGTM at 3140fba53dd8c0264d32dd17de2fb5b0a4882ca0, base 65147a03e465dc838770474736a620e04d72337e.

Reviewed all four changed files and linked methodology/peer-card owners against #91's consolidation scope. All 15 added link occurrences resolve (including 11 anchored occurrences); removing the insertions restores base content. The six-row assessment preserves component versus service evidence, startup versus request denominators, local H2D versus network transport, and placement controls versus PD implementation. The eight methods retain candidate / empirical_validation=not_run; the peer retains its separate pin, date and imported/unverified boundary. No actionable findings.

Ready CI passes all four Python 3.10/3.11 full-check and installed-package jobs. The exact-head policy status succeeds. The separate repository-wide policy run fails on six history-budget failures consistent with #140 plus an unrelated #113 declaration failure; #142 is compliant with errors=[] on all three attempts. This is not an all-workflows-green claim.

Read-only source, metadata, test-definition and existing CI inspection; no tests, installation, generator, model or hardware execution performed. No runtime compatibility, performance, agent efficacy or #91 completion is established. Review is not merge/acceptance authorization.