Skip to content

Reject conflicting bootstrap channel before staging - #143

Merged
LeiterConsulting merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/bootstrap-conflicting-head-preflight
Nov 12, 2026
Merged

LeiterConsulting merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/bootstrap-conflicting-head-preflight

Conversation

@LeiterConsulting

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Bounded safety fix

Read the raw existing channel pointer before bootstrap staging; reject a different revision with zero staging writes. Preserve existing post-stage atomic guards, authentication, exact-seed checks and default publication hold. No legacy channel migration, no cleanup of old state, and no activation.

Regression tests cover a raw conflicting pointer whose resolved head is unavailable, proving zero stageContentBundle calls and no state change. Documentation distinguishes bootstrap recovery from historical migration.

Validation

  • Focused suite: 52 passed.
  • Exact historical source tests: 14 passed after recovering and hash-verifying the original signed deployed source commit/tree.
  • Full maintenance:verify: passed locally, inputCount 1218.
  • Six changed files; generated content manifests/bundle reflect the real publisher engine change, with unchanged dataset digest 90724152168c84de71c7dbd70c052b80b2346b60a18481056b06d479c72787a0 and 948 records.
  • New engine engine-2c8ab6c231551a48ad85, revision content-950f79b4f0e8b2004202daf3.
  • Exact remote CI/export evidence pending.

Release boundary

Draft only. No merge, deployment, workflow enablement, bootstrap dispatch, channel migration or flag change. Current deployed-seed record remains v292; this changed runtime requires independently reviewed deployment and exact seed record before any future bootstrap. It is not an approval to initialize a new channel or bypass conflicting historical state.

@LeiterConsulting
LeiterConsulting marked this pull request as ready for review November 12, 2026 14:52
@LeiterConsulting
LeiterConsulting merged commit f491a3b into main Nov 12, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant