You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[P2 reanalysis] Compatible g-lift vs exact-lab ΔZ after the #633/#653 repairs #661
Parent: #650. Leftover of #633, not a new production and not a second #622.
Why this is a separate ticket
#633 restored spin-0 N725 Q/Z (PR #655) and retracted 159.6° → 20.4° unoriented on the tiny-torus g vs ΔZ reading. It left N725 g-versus-ΔZ undetermined (no second production size).
#632/#653 repaired the exact laboratory (dual_fail=0 on site; do not copy PR #628's broken bond Z).
The comparison #633 asked for can now be done on existing objects:
DZ_Q[g](u) = (g(u)−g(a))/W − (Q(u)−Q(a))(g(b)−g(a))/W²
W = Q(b)−Q(a)
Default shared anchors 0.2 and 0.8 (both exist on g's 9-decile grid). 1/4 and 3/4 only as a labelled sensitivity if you interpolate g. Compare unoriented lines (|cosine|). Tiny-torus ΔZ cannot prove an asymptotic mismatch — say so if that is still all you have.
Existing histograms and repaired exact-lab only. No N725 production. Draft PR against main. Do not become #622. Do not edit STATUS. Do not merge. Do not close #633.
Do not re-invert the N725 histogram on the Mac. Use PR #655n725-zflow-corrected.json and PR #653census-exact.json as written. If those artifacts are insufficient, comment NEED_HUAWEI and stop.
Activity
LightChainr commentedon Sep 8, 2026
Existing histograms and repaired exact-lab only. No N725 production. Draft PR against main. Do not become #622. Do not edit STATUS. Do not merge. Do not close #633.
LightChainr commentedon Sep 8, 2026
Do not re-invert the N725 histogram on the Mac. Use PR #655
n725-zflow-corrected.jsonand PR #653census-exact.jsonas written. If those artifacts are insufficient, commentNEED_HUAWEIand stop.LightChainr commentedon Sep 8, 2026
PR landed: #663
Grok check (no merge, leave open):