Repository navigation
Track rule coverage by vulnerability category #1257
Description
Objective
Extend GasGuard's repository analysis platform with track rule coverage by vulnerability category. The implementation should fit the existing analyzer/API/worker architecture, preserve tenant isolation, and produce predictable results for supported repository inputs.
Scope
- Workstream: Quality and Evaluation
- Repository:
MDTechLabs/GasGuard - Priority and owner: assign during triage
- Define the behavior and configuration surface for track rule coverage by vulnerability category.
- Integrate with the relevant analyzer, API, worker, persistence, or reporting boundary without coupling unrelated modules.
- Specify behavior for unsupported input, partial failure, retries, and backward compatibility.
Acceptance criteria
- Results remain deterministic for the same commit, configuration, and rule-pack version.
- Fixtures cover at least one realistic repository case and one regression case.
- Public interfaces, configuration, and failure semantics are documented.
- Unit tests cover success, boundary, invalid-input, and failure cases.
- Integration tests cover relevant component boundaries and persistence or RPC behavior.
- Logs and metrics are actionable and exclude secrets, private keys, and sensitive payloads.
- CI passes; the pull request links this issue and includes reproducible verification evidence.
Engineering notes
Prefer small, reviewable changes with explicit interfaces. Preserve existing behavior unless the issue intentionally changes it. Never commit secrets, access tokens, private keys, customer data, or sensitive production information.
Activity
Ranjeet2063 commentedon Oct 18, 2026
Hello maintainers,
I reviewed the requirements for "Track rule coverage by vulnerability category" and would like to work on this implementation.
I have reviewed the problem description and acceptance criteria for this issue. I have a clear, tested implementation ready with defensive error handling and 100% green CI proof.
I will deliver a clean, well-tested, and production-ready PR promptly upon assignment. Kindly assign this issue to me.
Thank you!
theoneesi commentedon Oct 18, 2026
@theoneesi has applied to work on this issue as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th wave.
ℹ️ Repo Maintainers: To accept this application, review their application or assign @theoneesi to this issue.
drips-wave commentedon Oct 18, 2026
Congratulations, @theoneesi! 🎉 Your application was accepted by the repo's maintainers, and the issue is due on October 22, 2026.
🧑💻 @theoneesi: Please resolve the issue such that the repo's maintainers have enough time to review your contribution before the due date. You'll earn Points for completing the issue on-time, which will make you eligible for a share of the Stellar Wave Program's reward pool.
Warning
When opening a PR, please link it to this issue to ensure it gets tracked accurately. Points are awarded when this issue is marked as completed by the maintainer.
🤠 Repo maintainers: Please keep an eye on the contributor's progress and review their work before the due date. You can manage this issue, including adjusting its complexity and points, here.
🌊 Happy Wave 🌊
grantfox-oss commentedon Oct 20, 2026
🎉 This issue has been marked as completed on GrantFox!
@theoneesi's PR #1283 was approved and merged by @mijinummi.
🏆 @theoneesi: You earned 35 FoxPoints for this contribution! Your current tier: Explorer (70 total points). Track your full progress on GrantFox.
👏 Great work, @theoneesi! Keep contributing to MDTechLabs.
feat: track rule coverage by vulnerability category (#1257)
Merge pull request #1283 from theoneesi/feat/track-rule-coverage-by-v…
drips-wave commentedon Oct 20, 2026
This issue has been completed by @theoneesi as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th Wave 🥳
😎 @theoneesi: You earned 200 Points for completing this issue! Once the Wave's rewards are finalized, you'll be eligible for a percentage of the Wave's reward pool based on the percentage of total points you've earned. Learn more here. You can also Leave a review to share your experience working on this issue.
🧑💻 Repo maintainers: How'd the contributor do? Leave a review to share your experience working with them.