Skip to content

feat(demo): add AGI 2028 comparison and recording script - #10

Merged
Silveroboros-dev merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/agi2028-demo
Oct 20, 2026
Merged

Silveroboros-dev merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/agi2028-demo

Conversation

@Silveroboros-dev

@Silveroboros-dev Silveroboros-dev commented Oct 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Adds AGI 2028 as the third offline fixture scenario alongside Stablecoin/Robinhood and Hormuz. Three project-authored contract summaries explain why recursive self-improvement is a weak proxy for a public autonomous-AI-research demonstration by the end of 2028. The current relatedness proposal and earlier automatic labels remain inspectable, with no-clean scoped to these three contracts.

Includes the four-minute recording script, saved-result consistency checks, source-bound relatedness support, and synthetic replay regressions. The logo and English interface are preserved. The public scenario is an educational reconstruction; the private historical packet, raw AGI market rules, human decision records, prices and operational configuration are excluded.

This projection contains 291 manifest-approved files from canonical source commit a5f9f74b219019eda32280d600e7c7d47172f3e9. It publishes source and reproducible fixtures and makes no claim about a current live reference service.

Validation:

  • Full exported offline suite: 828 passed, 23 skipped.
  • Canonical and self boundary scans passed before and after tests.
  • All new fixtures, documentation and synthetic tests inspected.
  • All protected-branch CI checks passed, including package, image, PostgreSQL, ADK, offline tests and public boundary checks.

Review follow-up: the source workflow intentionally leaves dormant legacy sections hidden; a new AGI-to-source reset regression checks the active sections and cleared records. The exact unassessed Hormuz reconstruction remains internally readable, while its public ownership boundaries stay unchanged. Private replay rationales now pass the generated-text vocabulary guard. All 105 affected tests passed after these changes.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-20T17:18:52.071637Z b9522fe PR opened
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-20T17:21:12.860914Z b9522fe PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: b9522fe933

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread el/product/static/product_console.html Resolved
Comment thread el/product/api.py Resolved
Comment thread el/product/app.py Resolved
@Silveroboros-dev
Silveroboros-dev merged commit 70da46d into main Oct 20, 2026
10 checks passed
@Silveroboros-dev
Silveroboros-dev deleted the codex/agi2028-demo branch October 20, 2026 17:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant