Skip to content

feat(public): update offline fixture reference to 0.2.0 - #8

Merged
Silveroboros-dev merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/public-release-0.2.0
Oct 16, 2026
Merged

Silveroboros-dev merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/public-release-0.2.0

Conversation

@Silveroboros-dev

@Silveroboros-dev Silveroboros-dev commented Oct 16, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Update the public fixture distribution to FitCheck 0.2.0 with a one-command, visitor-scoped offline demo and the standalone fitcheck-adk-client 0.1.0 package.

The update adds the synthetic six-market journey, packaged fixture inspection, retained-rules revisit, responsive branding, source-job restoration safeguards, migration guards and PostgreSQL coverage. Anonymous revisit controls now expose registered captures only; ordinary fixture replay remains available outside anonymous mode. Overlapping revisit deliveries recover the known UNIQUE-key races in fresh, bounded transactions, while ownership, active-revision and pinned-input checks remain enforced.

Generated-text handling and versioned token/source-quote policies preserve their declared compatibility boundaries; advisory remains disabled. Passing fixtures establish deterministic contracts, not real-world accuracy or live-provider compatibility.

The six market fixtures and two event bindings are newly authored synthetic resources. Exact retained Hormuz wording remains under the bounded hormuz-publication-risk-exception-v1: rights are unverified and the owner has accepted the residual publication risk. The historical wording stays outside the Apache grant. The public policy records the agent-relayed decision origin and approval-record digest; the private approval record and transcript are excluded.

Validation:

  • The 280-file tree matches the allowlisted candidate; canonical and self-boundary checks pass with 279 lock entries.
  • 102 combined source-side offline tests passed; actual Chromium verified anonymous retained comparison, refresh and reload.
  • Regressions reproduce the request/observation/capture races against real UNIQUE constraints and include conflicting input and authority checks; the same contention cases run in PostgreSQL CI.
  • Exact-head public CI passed all six required contexts: offline suite 759 passed / 4 skipped in an isolated network namespace; PostgreSQL 20 passed; boundary, package, container and standalone ADK checks passed. CodeQL passed all three analyses.
  • Independent final-head code and publication-boundary review passed; both reproduced review findings are fixed and their threads resolved.

All six public CI contexts, including adk-client-contracts, are now required for main (API readback verified). This PR does not deploy a service or publish packages.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 16, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-16T14:48:36.452887Z 440fabe PR opened
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-16T14:49:15.775795Z 440fabe PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 440fabeaa7

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread el/product/static/product_console.html Resolved
Comment thread el/revisit/service.py Resolved
@Silveroboros-dev
Silveroboros-dev merged commit 76e6eb7 into main Oct 16, 2026
10 checks passed
@Silveroboros-dev
Silveroboros-dev deleted the codex/public-release-0.2.0 branch October 16, 2026 15:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant