Skip to content

fix(stdlib): prevent panic on port binding in std.web - #132

Closed
Tcode-Motion wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-std-web-unwrap-panic-18201028135435300803
Closed

Tcode-Motion wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-std-web-unwrap-panic-18201028135435300803

Conversation

@Tcode-Motion

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Replaced the panic-inducing unwrap() calls when binding to a port in the std.web standard library module. Now, it returns a proper RuntimeError and resets the running state if the binding fails, improving stability and avoiding crashes. Updated relevant tests.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 18201028135435300803 started by @Tcode-Motion

- Replaced `unwrap()` calls on `tiny_http::Server::http` with matching the `Result`.
- When binding fails (e.g. port already in use), it now returns a `RuntimeError` instead of crashing the VM with a panic.
- `SERVER_RUNNING` is correctly set back to `false` on failure.
- Updated `stdlib_tests.rs` to expect errors instead of panics for these conditions.

Co-authored-by: Tcode-Motion <188012755+Tcode-Motion@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant