Skip to content

⚡ [performance improvement] Parallelize linting I/O and processing - #191

Merged
Tcode-Motion merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
perf-lint-rayon-14372932745298422202
Sep 22, 2026
Merged

Tcode-Motion merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
perf-lint-rayon-14372932745298422202

Conversation

@Tcode-Motion

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

💡 What: Use rayon to process lint files in parallel using par_iter(). Updated the LintRule trait to require Send + Sync.
🎯 Why: Linting reads files synchronously in a single-threaded loop, which becomes a bottleneck when linting large codebases with many files.
📊 Measured Improvement: We do not have a full integration performance benchmark set up for tsc lint execution on huge repositories, but a synthetic script iterating over files using par_iter demonstrates that by parallelizing file reads and the perfectly independent CPU-bound static analysis phases (lexer, parser, semantic analyzer, and linter), the runtime scales efficiently with the number of CPU cores.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 14372932745298422202 started by @Tcode-Motion

Replaced the sequential loop over files to lint with a Rayon `par_iter().map().reduce()` to parallelize file reads and the CPU-bound static analysis phases (lexer, parser, semantic analyzer, and linter). Updated `LintRule` trait to require `Send + Sync` to support concurrent execution.

Co-authored-by: Tcode-Motion <188012755+Tcode-Motion@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@Tcode-Motion
Tcode-Motion marked this pull request as ready for review September 22, 2026 07:52
@Tcode-Motion
Tcode-Motion merged commit 24d6bd8 into main Sep 22, 2026
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant