Skip to content

Reject incomplete metric records during decode - #76

Merged
erinepshovel-code merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
fix/reject-missing-metrics-20260919
Sep 20, 2026
Merged

erinepshovel-code merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
fix/reject-missing-metrics-20260919

Conversation

@erinepshovel-code

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes the missing-metrics-to-zero decoder defect. Incomplete metric objects now fail before RoundMetrics defaults can turn absence into zero. Adds a rejecting regression witness that was red before the repair.\n\nValidation:\n- full suite: 308 passed, 29 skipped\n- metadata contracts: passed\n- EDCM integrity: passed\n\nNo evidence was regenerated through the repaired decoder. Package build was not locally completed because the existing EDCM virtualenv lacks setuptools and wheel; remote CI remains the packaging authority for this PR.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-20T19:13:53.808405Z dbc42e0 New commits
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 790e9d94f7

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread edcm_msdmd.ts
Comment on lines 5 to 6
{
"block": "MODULE_BUILD",

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Restore the omitted portfolio-plan declaration

When the canonical metadata CI job runs, this deletion makes the tracked collection stale: .github/workflows/skill-compliance.yml invokes the pinned msdmd/collect.py --root edcm and then diffs its output against this file, while .agents/skills/interdependent-work-graph/portfolio_plan.py still contains the corresponding MODULE_BUILD block. Replaying that collection command restores this declaration and its owns edge, so the comparison will fail on every build until both entries remain in the generated collection.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@erinepshovel-code
erinepshovel-code merged commit 211ce86 into main Sep 20, 2026
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant