Skip to content

feat(ucns): declare and instantiate scale-transform substrate - #232

Open
erinepshovel-code wants to merge 9 commits into
mainfrom
canon/scale-transformation-jurisdiction
Open

erinepshovel-code wants to merge 9 commits into
mainfrom
canon/scale-transformation-jurisdiction

Conversation

@erinepshovel-code

@erinepshovel-code erinepshovel-code commented Sep 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Purpose

Make UCNS's scale/representation jurisdiction explicit and add the first narrow executable component of that architecture without importing domain semantics.

Architecture

  • METAPAT: cross-domain semantic authority and transfer constraints
  • UCNS: geometry / mathematical representation and scale transport
  • EDCM: measurement and evaluation
  • consumers: domain meaning and evidence

Current METAPAT v4 was consulted before the boundary was changed.

Implementation

Adds src/ucns/scale_action.py, an exact domain-agnostic candidate action

T_q(x)_i = q^w_i x_i

over positive exact-rational coordinates, with:

  • exact integer weights;
  • exact multiplicative composition T_p o T_q = T_(p*q);
  • identity and reciprocal inverse;
  • exact monomial scale weight sum(a_i*w_i);
  • invariant-kernel test;
  • replayable application receipts;
  • no domain axis names or interpretations in the core.

The candidate is deliberately narrower than a universal ScaleTransform law. It does not yet bind native Möbius origin/attachment, recursive carrier transitions, or the higher-dimensional UCNS construction.

External physics fixture removed from UCNS

The conditional six-axis physics fixture formerly drafted here has been moved to Stack PR #56:

The-Interdependency/stack#56

UCNS now keeps only the domain-agnostic scale-action machinery. The external physics fixture owns the names (epsilon, mu, c, hbar, m, L), confinement/Compton algebra, and all physical interpretation under Stack provenance. No physics premise, trapped-field claim, varying-constants claim, or cosmological claim transfers into UCNS.

Documentation / agent boundary

  • promotes scale/representation jurisdiction into CANON.md;
  • adds the placement test to AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md;
  • updates README.md;
  • adds docs/scale-transformation-jurisdiction.md;
  • preserves the incomplete composition/origin boundary as hmmm;
  • deletes the misplaced UCNS physics fixture.

Tests / contracts

The new module owns MODULE_BUILD + five CONTRACTS; tests/test_scale_action.py owns the resolving CHECKS, including facade exposure.

Exact lineage

Base: 5a042416ef62abd9b674523284c2a31193918d66

Current head: a374e2a8f08be2140d88a0ab24daaad2e5a98864

File plan

path change purpose risk required tests
src/ucns/scale_action.py create exact multiplicative scale-action candidate candidate overpromotion / arithmetic drift contract checks + exact unit tests
tests/test_scale_action.py create executable witnesses false-positive evidence contract graph + full suite
docs/scale-transform-physics-fixture.md delete move external physics mapping to Stack broken references / lost provenance Stack PR #56 preserves fixture
src/ucns/__init__.py modify public candidate surface export drift facade check
CANON.md modify explicit jurisdiction and candidate standing accidental ratification doctrine review
README.md modify usage guidance stale claims distribution/doc review
docs/scale-transformation-jurisdiction.md modify primitive audit and hmmm boundary scope blur doctrine review
AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md modify placement rules agent routing drift review

hmmm

The exact law binding this multiplicative action to UCNS origin/attachment, native Möbius transport, recursive carriers, and the full circle → epicycle → disk → sphere → recursive-scale construction remains unresolved.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

@erinepshovel-code erinepshovel-code changed the title docs(ucns): declare scale-transformation jurisdiction feat(ucns): declare and instantiate scale-transform substrate Sep 24, 2026

@erinepshovel-code erinepshovel-code left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 placement finding: preserve the domain-neutral scale action in UCNS, but move the physics-domain fixture out of UCNS. This PR correctly declares that domain meaning/evidence stays with the consumer and METAPAT domain-restraint says structural recurrence does not transfer domain terms, mechanisms, or evidence standards. docs/scale-transform-physics-fixture.md nevertheless makes UCNS the host of epsilon/mu/c/hbar/m/L names, a varying-constants hypothesis, Compton/confinement interpretation, and particle-physics falsification criteria. Keep the exact T_q action, invariant-kernel machinery, and a domain-neutral fixture/interface here; put the physics binding in the consuming/incubating physics research layer (Stack unless another source owner exists) and link it by exact source identity. Re-run exact-head geometry CI and review after the move.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Executed the requested placement repair.

  • Deleted the misplaced UCNS physics fixture.
  • Updated README and scale-transformation jurisdiction docs so UCNS owns only the domain-agnostic scale-action candidate.
  • Moved the conditional physics fixture to Stack and merged it as docs(physics): consume UCNS scale-action fixture outside core stack#56 at daf5ed81f9964bccbe79330bc6ab9dfb0438c918 after the Stack consistency workflow passed.

Current UCNS head is a374e2a8f08be2140d88a0ab24daaad2e5a98864; geometry CI is still running at this comment. Merge should wait for the current exact-head workflow and review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant