Skip to content

Bring the 2026-10-03 review's register entries up to date - #598

Merged
The-Running-Dev merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
align/2026-10-16-review-register
Oct 16, 2026
Merged

The-Running-Dev merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
align/2026-10-16-review-register

Conversation

@The-Running-Dev

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

What

Three open-register entries under Found by the 2026-10-03 repository review in design/90-decisions.md still described work as pending. Each one now records how it was settled:

docs/docs/engine/OPEN-QUESTIONS.md is regenerated from the register. No contract or design semantics changed, so the guide was not restamped.

Verified

  • ./build/ConvertTo-HumanDocumentation.ps1, then ./build/Test-Documentation.ps1: both pass (19 generated pages, 135 Markdown files).
  • git diff --check is clean.
  • Engine typecheck, lint and tests were not run, because no code changed.
  • ./docs.ps1 -BuildOnly was not run locally; the docs check on this PR covers it.

Content epochs were built as S129-S135, S129 closed the campaignVersion gap on raw
deserialize, and #565 decided the public brand. Each entry keeps its history and gains the
outcome, following the register's existing Resolved-note convention.
@The-Running-Dev
The-Running-Dev merged commit e2404bf into main Oct 16, 2026
9 checks passed
@The-Running-Dev
The-Running-Dev deleted the align/2026-10-16-review-register branch October 16, 2026 21:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant