Repository navigation
fix(GCVE-110-VULN-PYPI-2026-000868): describe the yamcs-fops controller privilege issue - #14
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…er privilege issue Rewrites the record from a generic exec() finding to the actual flaw: in 0.1.0 and 0.1.1 a procedure, its shell included, keeps acting with the Yamcs token of the user who started it after another user takes control. CWE-269, CVSS 6.6. Affected 0.1.0 up to 0.2.0 on PyPI and Maven Central, fixed in 0.2.0. Closes #12
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rewrites GCVE-110-VULN-PYPI-2026-000868 (yamcs-fops), disputed in #12.
The record described the shell's
exec()as the weakness. That shell is a documented feature:evalandset_variableneedfops.Shelland control of the execution, and the README says what the privilege grants. The real issue is whose Yamcs privileges that code acts with.Evidence
Executions.launchgives the worker a Yamcs token for the user who started the execution, or for the service user on a timeline run (Executions.java#L322, #L338).Execution.takeControlonly changes the controller and keeps that token. Sub-procedures also start as the original user (startCall(parent, r, user)).controller_lost). Through the shell, a user withfops.Control+fops.Shellthen acts with the starter's (or service user's) privileges. Answering a command prompt, by contrast, checks the acting user's ownCommandprivilege (FopsHandler.java#L237).yamcs-fops0.1.0, 0.1.1, 0.2.0, 0.2.1. Maven Centralcom.jaops.yamcs:yamcs-fops0.1.0, 0.2.0, 0.2.1 (0.1.1 was never published there). Both are released together at one version.Change
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:LAV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hyamcs-fopsand Mavencom.jaops.yamcs:yamcs-fops: 0.1.0 up to 0.2.0, fixed 0.2.0, default unaffectedCVSS rationale:
AV:N: the shell is reached through the plugin's HTTP API.PR:H: needsfops.Control+fops.Shell.AC:H: needs an uncontrolled execution started by a user with more privileges, or a timeline run.C/I/A:H: the attacker gets the starter's or service user's Yamcs rights, which can include commanding.Other changes:
Execution.takeControl,Executions.launch).detection.matched_lines, because theexec()line is the feature, not the flaw.disputedtag.modified/dateUpdated/index/manifest.jsonupdated.The Vulnetix record validates against
schemas/vulnetix-advisory-1.3.0.schema.json. The OSV and CVE 5 files validate against the upstream OSV and CVE 5.1 schemas (with the id patterns aside).Closes #12