Skip to content

site: drop redundant recording, reorder comparison after Try it - #191

Merged
alpibrupa merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
prune-and-reorder
Sep 24, 2026
Merged

alpibrupa merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
prune-and-reorder

Conversation

@alpibrupa

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Removed the "Try it" section's zip.cast player and the now-unused file — the hero's friendly.cast already demonstrates the same kind of one-shot run; the command text stays, pointing back at the hero recording instead.
  • Moved "Why not just use Cursor..." to after "Try it" (was the second section on the page, before the reader had seen anything). Nav reordered to match: Why → Issues → Try it → vs. Cursor.

Test plan

  • Served locally, confirmed no orphaned player / broken script reference, section order and nav links match

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

alpibrupa and others added 2 commits September 24, 2026 15:38
The hero's friendly.cast already proves "here's a real one-shot run" —
the Try it section's own zip.cast was the same kind of demo again, one
scroll down, of the same category of interaction. Dropped the player
(and the unused file); the command text stays, now pointing back at
the hero recording for what running it live actually looks like.

Also moves "why not Cursor" to after Try it instead of before Why /
Try it: a comparison lands better once the reader has actually seen
the thing, not as the second section on the page before any of it has
been shown.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
"Why not just use Cursor, Copilot, or Claude Code directly?" and a
nav link reading "vs. Cursor" put this next to companies with orders
of magnitude more resources, staged as competition. Retitled to what
it actually is — where a narrow experiment fits next to tools people
already use, not a case against them.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@alpibrupa
alpibrupa merged commit c2b5018 into main Sep 24, 2026
1 check passed
@alpibrupa
alpibrupa deleted the prune-and-reorder branch September 24, 2026 14:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant