Skip to content

Correct Screenpipe MCP access, authentication and cloud context - #111

Closed
louis030195 wants to merge 4 commits into
assafbar2:mainfrom
louis030195:fix-screenpipe-mcp-context-20260919
Closed

louis030195 wants to merge 4 commits into
assafbar2:mainfrom
louis030195:fix-screenpipe-mcp-context-20260919

Conversation

@louis030195

@louis030195 louis030195 commented Sep 19, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

What kind of change?

  • Correction to an existing entry

The Screenpipe entry omits MCP access, says authentication is unnecessary, and describes capture as never sending data to a server. This updates the existing listing to point to the official MCP setup, identify local API key authentication, and distinguish local capture from configured cloud services.

The description and skills now focus on searchable history, recall and work summaries. Additional context documents the source-available Screenpipe Commercial License and links current pricing. I replaced the unsourced cohort and broad privacy tags with specific capability tags. The existing maintainer-set featured and directory tier fields are preserved; verified is set to false for this vendor correction as requested by CONTRIBUTING.md.

Relationship: I am Screenpipe's founder/maintainer, submitting on behalf of the product.

Sources checked:

Checklist

  • npx tsx scripts/validate-content.ts passes locally: 690 agents, 22 categories, zero violations
  • Added an updated entry to content/changelog.json
  • All linked product and documentation URLs load
  • Skills describe documented capabilities
  • Vendor submission sets verified: false for maintainer review

git diff --check also passes. Only the listing JSON and changelog changed. I have not claimed a new live endpoint verification; the existing recorder and configured local key are required for the MCP workflow.

Updated against upstream main on October 7, 2026 and resolved the changelog conflict, preserving all 810 upstream entries and the Screenpipe correction. The content validator and whitespace check pass. The Vercel preview still requires authorization from the upstream project owner.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Someone is attempting to deploy a commit to the assafbar-gmailcom's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@greptile-apps greptile-apps Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your trial has ended. Reactivate Greptile to resume code reviews.

@greptile-apps greptile-apps Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your trial has ended. Reactivate Greptile to resume code reviews.

@greptile-apps greptile-apps Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your trial has ended. Reactivate Greptile to resume code reviews.

@louis030195

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Resolved the changelog conflict against current main in 766ed87, preserving all 1,171 upstream changelog entries and the Screenpipe correction. The content validator passes: 908 agents, 22 categories, zero violations. git diff --check also passes.

Could you review this correction for the next weekly drop? GitHub Actions approval and Vercel preview authorization remain on the maintainer side.

@assafbar2

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Thanks: MCP access is live at https://agentswitchboard.dev/agents/screenpipe, in the November 10, 2026 drop. The rest of the listing stays as it is. Pull request #370 carries the change and credits this one, so this pull request is closed rather than merged.

@assafbar2 assafbar2 closed this Nov 10, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants