Skip to content

store: Support read-only /sysroot on a live ISO#2275

Open
cgwalters wants to merge 1 commit into
bootc-dev:mainfrom
cgwalters:handle-readonly-root
Open

store: Support read-only /sysroot on a live ISO#2275
cgwalters wants to merge 1 commit into
bootc-dev:mainfrom
cgwalters:handle-readonly-root

Conversation

@cgwalters

@cgwalters cgwalters commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

We want to support at least read-only operation when mounted from a physically read-only medium (like a squashfs/EROFS for /sysroot).

Check the backing block device status, and propagate its read-only state up.

Generated-by: AI

@cgwalters cgwalters force-pushed the handle-readonly-root branch from fd89199 to ee4ddc2 Compare July 2, 2026 20:52
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the area/documentation Updates to the documentation label Jul 2, 2026
@bootc-bot bootc-bot Bot requested a review from henrywang July 2, 2026 20:52
Comment thread crates/lib/src/store/mod.rs
Comment thread crates/lib/src/store/mod.rs
Comment thread crates/lib/src/store/mod.rs
We want to support at least read-only operation when mounted from
a physically read-only medium (like a squashfs/EROFS for /sysroot).

Check the backing block device status, and propagate its read-only
state up.

Generated-by: AI
Signed-off-by: Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>
@cgwalters cgwalters force-pushed the handle-readonly-root branch from ee4ddc2 to 3edab54 Compare July 9, 2026 15:20
@cgwalters cgwalters enabled auto-merge July 10, 2026 19:08
@cgwalters

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

OK this one should just need a re-stamp!

@cgwalters cgwalters added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 13, 2026
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jul 13, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/documentation Updates to the documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants