Skip to content

ci: automated Claude review for PRs by chayan-bit - #38

Merged
chayan-bit merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/claude-review
Oct 18, 2026
Merged

chayan-bit merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/claude-review

Conversation

@chayan-bit

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Adds .github/workflows/claude-review.yml, an automated Claude Code review that runs on non-draft PRs authored by chayan-bit (on open, reopen and ready-for-review).

It activates once the CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN secret is set and the Claude GitHub App is installed on this repo. Until then the workflow will fail on PRs by chayan-bit.

Re-review: add the claude-review label to a PR to run the review again.

Demo (a real review on a test PR) will be added after activation.

@chayan-bit
chayan-bit marked this pull request as ready for review October 18, 2026 00:27
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 18, 2026 00:27

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 18, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-18T00:29:40.156213Z f033c67 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: f033c676c5

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

plugin_marketplaces: "https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code.git"
plugins: "code-review@claude-code-plugins"
prompt: "/code-review:code-review --comment ${{ github.repository }}/pull/${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}"
claude_args: '--allowedTools "mcp__github_inline_comment__create_inline_comment"'

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Allow the GitHub CLI tools required by the review

On every eligible PR, the /code-review plugin uses gh pr view, gh pr diff, and gh pr comment to inspect and report on the PR, but this configuration only enables the inline-comment MCP tool. Bash is disabled by default in Claude Code Action unless commands are explicitly enabled through claude_args, so these calls are denied and the workflow can complete without producing a review. Add the plugin's required Bash(gh ...) permissions alongside the MCP permission; the action FAQ documents the Bash restriction, and the official PR-review example allowlists the required gh pr commands.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@chayan-bit
chayan-bit merged commit 7807e2b into main Oct 18, 2026
8 checks passed
@chayan-bit
chayan-bit deleted the ci/claude-review branch October 18, 2026 00:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants