Skip to content

docs: harden README for GEO/citation and current main install path - #1

Open
chenhao233 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/readme-geo-harden-e4fe
Open

chenhao233 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/readme-geo-harden-e4fe

Conversation

@chenhao233

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Updates README.md only to match the proposed GEO/citation draft. No changes to Skill code, LICENSE file contents, or GitHub Releases/tags.

What changed

  • Version visibility: States current mainline 1.5.5, aligned with pmnote/SKILL.md metadata.version (verified in-repo).
  • Install source of truth: Directs visitors and agents to main (including main-branch ZIP), not outdated Release ZIPs.
  • Scope clarity: Adds「它是什么 / 不是什么」and game-PM vs generic product-PM boundaries.
  • Install paths: Agent install table (WorkBuddy, Cursor, Codex, Claude Code, etc.), verification prompt from INSTALL.md, and links to INSTALL / CONTRIBUTING.
  • Examples & GEO hooks: Example user questions and capability summary vs early Release packages.
  • License: Documents 免费使用许可 v2.0 (2026-11-02) and not open source, with note on legacy MIT v1.0.0 wording.

Out of scope (per request)

  • Skill code, LICENSE text, new Release/tag

Verification

  • Local: README-only diff; metadata.version in pmnote/SKILL.md remains 1.5.5.
  • CI: Check Skill workflow (index check, tests, package) on this PR.
Open in Web Open in Cursor 

…2.0)

Co-authored-by: chenhao233 <chenhao233@users.noreply.github.com>
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ❌ Failed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ❌ Failed 2026-11-09T10:05:40.788111Z
We couldn’t complete this review. Comment @codex review to try again.
7df09a0 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants