Skip to content

feat(ENG-13667): adding betterleaks checks to pre-commit hooks and CI - #358

Closed
coillteoir wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
ENG-13667/betterleaks
Closed

feat(ENG-13667): adding betterleaks checks to pre-commit hooks and CI#358
coillteoir wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
ENG-13667/betterleaks

Conversation

@coillteoir

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 17, 2026 16:29
@coillteoir
coillteoir requested a review from a team as a code owner August 17, 2026 16:29

jobs:
betterleaks:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Note

Copilot was unable to run its full agentic suite in this review.

Adds Betterleaks secret scanning to the repo via both pre-commit and a GitHub Actions workflow, plus reformats the pre-commit YAML for consistent indentation.

Changes:

  • Re-indented .pre-commit-config.yaml and added the betterleaks pre-commit hook.
  • Added a new GitHub Actions workflow to run Betterleaks on pushes and PRs.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File Description
.pre-commit-config.yaml Reformat YAML and add Betterleaks hook to run locally via pre-commit.
.github/workflows/betterleaks.yaml Introduce CI workflow to run Betterleaks on push/PR events.

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Comment on lines +15 to +17
id: betterleaks
with:
github-token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
Comment on lines +14 to +17
- uses: dortort/betterleaks-action@v0.1.0
id: betterleaks
with:
github-token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
@coillteoir coillteoir closed this Aug 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants