CITATION.cff: cite the v1.0 DOI - #14
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Zenodo minted 10.5281/zenodo.22783324 for the v1.0 release (record titled "roseNNa v1.0", linked to tree/v1.0). The file now cites it, which matches the `version: 1.0` beside it. The DOI that was there, 10.5281/zenodo.7334627, is not the concept DOI as it might look -- it is v0.1's VERSION DOI. So the file has been claiming one version and citing another ever since, and updating `version:` alone would have left that intact. The concept DOI is 10.5281/zenodo.7334626, and it now appears under `identifiers:` for anyone who wants to cite the software across versions rather than this release. Both resolve: the version DOI to records/22783324, the concept DOI to the same place while v1.0 is latest.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Zenodo minted
10.5281/zenodo.22783324for v1.0.CITATION.cffnow cites it, matching theversion: 1.0beside it.The DOI that was there (
10.5281/zenodo.7334627) is v0.1's version DOI, not the concept DOI as it looks — so the file has been claiming one version and citing another. The concept DOI is10.5281/zenodo.7334626and is now listed underidentifiers:for citing the software across versions.Both verified to resolve.