Skip to content

🛡️ Sentinel: MEDIUM Enforce input length limit on dunning parameters - #242

Closed
d0linger wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
jules-3545125674704810834-4d1e9e94
Closed

d0linger wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
jules-3545125674704810834-4d1e9e94

Conversation

@d0linger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary of Security Enhancement

  • 🚨 Severity: MEDIUM
  • 💡 Vulnerability: Unbounded parameter string lengths passed to dunningStageParam and dunningYearParam prior to integer parsing.
  • 🎯 Impact: An attacker sending oversized payload strings in stufe or year parameters could trigger unnecessary memory allocations and CPU consumption during parsing, leading to Denial of Service (DoS) risks.
  • 🔧 Fix: Added explicit raw string length checks (len(raw) > 50) in dunningStageParam and dunningYearParam before strconv.Atoi / strconv.ParseInt conversion.
  • ✅ Verification: Added unit tests in internal/server/dunning_test.go and internal/server/web_audit_test.go verifying rejection of oversized parameter inputs. All unit and integration tests (go test ./...) pass.

PR created automatically by Jules for task 3545125674704810834 started by @d0linger

Enforce input length validation limits (capped at 50 characters) on `stufe`
and `year` parameters in `dunningStageParam` and `dunningYearParam` prior to
integer conversion to protect against resource and memory exhaustion (DoS) attacks.

Co-authored-by: d0linger <61334677+d0linger@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@d0linger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Superseded by #251

@d0linger d0linger closed this Oct 23, 2026
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Superseded by #251

Understood. Acknowledging that this pull request is superseded and stopping work on this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant