Skip to content

[2380] Add support of SatisfyRequirementUsage inheritance - #2381

Open
jerome-obeo wants to merge 1 commit into
eclipse-syson:mainfrom
jerome-obeo:jgo/enh/support_inheritance_of_statisfy_requirements
Open

[2380] Add support of SatisfyRequirementUsage inheritance#2381
jerome-obeo wants to merge 1 commit into
eclipse-syson:mainfrom
jerome-obeo:jgo/enh/support_inheritance_of_statisfy_requirements

Conversation

@jerome-obeo

@jerome-obeo jerome-obeo commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Add support of SatisfyRequirementUsage inheritance in satisfy requirements compartment of PartUsage and PartDefinition graphical nodes.

Bug: #2380

PLEASE READ ALL ITEMS AND CHECK ONLY RELEVANT CHECKBOXES BELOW

Auto review

  • Have you reviewed this PR? Please do a first quick review, It is very useful to detect typos and missing copyrights, check comments, check your code... The reviewer will thank you for that :)

Project management

  • Has the pull request been added to the relevant milestone?
  • Have the priority: and pr: labels been added to the pull request? (In case of doubt, start with the labels priority: low and pr: to review later)
  • Have the relevant issues been added to the pull request?
  • Have the relevant labels been added to the issues? (area:, type:)
  • Have the relevant issues been added to the same project milestone as the pull request?

Changelog and release notes

  • Has the CHANGELOG.adoc + doc/content/modules/user-manual/pages/release-notes/YYYY.MM.0.adoc been updated to reference the relevant issues?
  • Have the relevant API breaks been described in the CHANGELOG.adoc?
  • Are the new / upgraded dependencies mentioned in the relevant section of the CHANGELOG.adoc?
  • In case of a change with a visual impact, are there any screenshots in the doc/content/modules/user-manual/pages/release-notes/YYYY.MM.0.adoc?
  • In case of a key change, has the change been added to Key highlights section in doc/content/modules/user-manual/pages/release-notes/YYYY.MM.0.adoc?

Documentation

  • Have you included an update of the documentation in your pull request? Please ask yourself if an update (installation manual, user manual, developer manual...) is needed and add one accordingly.

Tests

  • Is the code properly tested? Any pull request (fix, enhancement or new feature) should come with a test (or several). It could be unit tests, integration tests or cypress tests depending on the context. Only doc and releng pull request do not need for tests.

import org.eclipse.syson.util.SysMLMetamodelHelper;

/**
* The inherited satisfy requirements compartment list item node description provider.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it really needed?

@jerome-obeo jerome-obeo Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This time, it is necessary, because the reference to hold satisfy requirement in a PartUsage is SysmlPackage.eINSTANCE.getUsage_NestedRequirement() whereas the compartment item node description has a domain type set to SysmlPackage.eINSTANCE.getSatisfyRequirementUsage() and not SysmlPackage.eINSTANCE.getRequirementUsage().
Same explanation for PartDefinition.

Add support of `SatisfyRequirementUsage` inheritance in _satisfy
requirements_ compartment of `PartUsage` and `PartDefinition` graphical
nodes.

Bug: eclipse-syson#2380
Signed-off-by: Jerome Gout <jerome.gout@obeosoft.com>
@jerome-obeo
jerome-obeo force-pushed the jgo/enh/support_inheritance_of_statisfy_requirements branch from c86e54d to ad5b87a Compare August 4, 2026 13:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add support of SatisfyRequirementUsage inheritance in satisfy requirements compartment of PartUsage and PartDefinition

2 participants