Fix the LaTeX title for Python 3.11

[pyedaa-claude]

Bug Fixes

• doc/conf.py:

  • 🪲 The LaTeX document title didn't parse on Python 3.11.

    f"The {pythonProject.replace("_", r"\_")} Documentation",

    This needs PEP 701 twice: it reuses the f-string's own quote character
    inside the replacement field, and it puts a backslash in one. Both were accepted only from Python 3.12. On
    3.11 the file is a SyntaxError, so a documentation build fails before Sphinx reads a single page.

    The escaped name is built into latexProject first, marked # WORKAROUND: Python <3.12 with the inlined form
    kept in the comment, so dropping 3.11 is a search for the marker. The rendered title is unchanged —
    sphinx_reports still becomes The sphinx\_reports Documentation.

Others

• CI never saw this, and still wouldn't: SphinxDocumentation.yml defaults to python_version: '3.14' and no
  pipeline overrides it. This is for a local build on 3.11, and for the day that default moves.

• Six sibling repositories share this conf.py — pyVHDLModel, pyEDAA.Reports, pyEDAA.OutputFilter,
  pyEDAA.ProjectModel, sphinx-reports and Actions. Each gets the identical change, so the files stay copies of
  one template.

• Found after the same construct broke all 31 Python 3.11 jobs of
  pyTooling/pyTooling — there it was package code, so it took the whole
  package down at import.

---

Related Issues and Pull-Requests

• Companion pull-requests in the five other repositories sharing this doc/conf.py.

[codacy-production]

Not up to standards ⛔

🔴 Issues 1 minor

Alerts:
⚠ 1 issue (≤ 0 issues of at least minor severity)

Results:
1 new issue

Category	Results
CodeStyle	1 minor

View in Codacy

🟢 Metrics 0 complexity · 0 duplication

Metric	Results
Complexity	0
Duplication	0

View in Codacy

🟢 Coverage ∅ diff coverage · +0.00% coverage variation

Metric	Results
Coverage variation	✅ +0.00% coverage variation (-1.00%)
Diff coverage	✅ ∅ diff coverage

View coverage diff in Codacy

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (d2127cc)	Report Missing	Report Missing	Report Missing
Head commit (1345897)	71 (+0)	45 (+0)	63.38% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#57)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

¹ Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct.

_{NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 61.97%. Comparing base (d2127cc) to head (1345897).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev      #57   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   61.97%   61.97%           
=======================================
  Files           1        1           
  Lines          71       71           
  Branches       13       13           
=======================================
  Hits           44       44           
  Misses         26       26           
  Partials        1        1           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	61.97% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.