Skip to content

Better nsjail - #53

Open
EnderHubris wants to merge 4 commits into
developfrom
better-nsjail
Open

Better nsjail#53
EnderHubris wants to merge 4 commits into
developfrom
better-nsjail

Conversation

@EnderHubris

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Items regarding nsjail are better-worded in hopes to reduce confusion by admins. Jails can be widely configured through special json config files, there is a HANDLER.md that contains documentation for these nsjail config files. These configurations allow admins making challenges to set the main binary nsjail will execute along with defining a list of files the jail must contain to properly function.

EnderHubris and others added 3 commits July 28, 2026 17:31
Migrating in-transit flag handling into this branch.
Locally composed image the improved handler works!
@EnderHubris
EnderHubris requested a review from Monster0506 July 30, 2026 03:54
@EnderHubris EnderHubris added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 30, 2026

@Monster0506 Monster0506 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Other than these few things, LGTM!

Comment thread handler/handler.js Outdated
Comment thread handler/server.js Outdated
Comment thread handler/utils_h.js
Comment thread handler/handler.js Outdated
@EnderHubris
EnderHubris marked this pull request as draft July 31, 2026 03:35
@EnderHubris
EnderHubris marked this pull request as ready for review July 31, 2026 18:46
Comment thread package.json
"version": "0.0.1",
"type": "module",
"scripts": {
"test": "bun test",

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you should also add a svelte-check or svelte-check-rs option here.

Svelte is cool and brings its own type checker along, the rs version is written in rust and fast.

@Monster0506
Monster0506 self-requested a review August 5, 2026 16:55

@Monster0506 Monster0506 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants