Repository navigation
docs(security): land secret-types research note - #31
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Co-authored-by: arena-agent <297053741+arena-agent@users.noreply.github.com>
Contributor
|
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Advanced Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
arena-ai-coding-agent
Bot
deleted the
arena/01a0e132-epistemic-types
branch
September 27, 2026 05:25
hyperpolymath
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2026
#38) ## What this is The **cross-reference review of the Secret Types transition** requested in the session task: compare the migration note of `hyperpolymath/secret-types` (PR #4, commit `d1122d8`, merged 2026-10-04) with this repository's current docs and tracked work, record accurate cross-references, and state what has moved, what remains owned here, and where follow-up belongs. **Refs #32. It does not close, transfer, or duplicate #32.** Issue #32 stays in this repository and stays open as the origin/decision record. `#29` is untouched and stays closed. Nothing is moved or deleted; superseded text is marked, not rewritten. ## Findings recorded - **#32 is not obsolete and was not transferred.** The note here said the issue "is obsolete as titled" and referred to "the transferred #32". No transfer occurred — secret-types PR #4 documents that issue writes returned `403` — and nothing in the 2026-10-04 placement decision transfers the *issue*. The work moved; the issue stays. - **Provenance verified.** The standalone spec's `583017cfd5fa…` blob resolves to `583017cfd5fab189ca17128d01c7eddb494d8476` (19,326 bytes) — this repo's `docs/secret-types.adoc` at PR #33 (`d97ecaab`), not the PR #31 draft (`cf0a152e…`, 9,436 bytes) and not the PR #37 boundary revision. - **Closure is not due.** The standalone spec's "Review checklist before implementation" states it "has not yet been completed item by item", and PR #37 carries an unresolved `CHANGES_REQUESTED` finding about the #32 open-state wording. The tracking update is therefore **prepared but not posted**, in `docs/secret-types-transition-review-2026-10-05.adoc`. - **Downstream trackers are stale and owned elsewhere.** `nextgen-typing` `docs/TYPE-CONNECTIONS.adoc` has no secret-types row (checked 2026-10-05); `valence-shell` `docs/THEORY-FEED.adoc` still records the pre-2026-10-04 "mint it or fold it into epistemic-types#32" owner call and grades the feed `?`/`?`; Anytype#15 remains open. Recorded here, not edited there. - The four "ready-to-post" texts named in secret-types PR #4 were never persisted anywhere; that process gap is recorded. ## Changes - `docs/secret-types.adoc` — corrected #32 status; new "Cross-reference review — 2026-10-05" section; retained checklist marked with a note (item 5 decided: standalone); related-documentation links. - `docs/secret-types-transition-review-2026-10-05.adoc` — full review record, evidence table, ownership split, and the exact proposed #32 comment (prepared, **not** posted). - `STATE.a2ml`, `META.a2ml` (ADR-007), `0-AI-MANIFEST.a2ml` — removed the "pending transfer of #32" wording. - `README.adoc`, `docs/README.adoc`, `CHANGELOG.adoc` — pointers and entry. ## Verification - Docs-only: no Agda source touched; the CI proof gate (Agda 2.6.4.3, `scripts/check.sh`) still runs on this PR. - Provenance, issue states, PR states, and the downstream files were checked against the GitHub API on 2026-10-05; no local Agda/asciidoctor in the sandbox, so rendering and proofs are left to CI (not claimed here). - The commit is unsigned (`Require-Signed-Commits` covers the default branch); land it with the repo's GitHub **squash** merge, as with PR #37. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: arena-agent <297053741+arena-agent@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #29
Decision
Land the preserved secret-types direction as research documentation within
epistemic-types, not as a new repository. The note is rewritten against the current interfaces and sets out the in-repository path to a possible formal model.What changed
docs/secret-types.adoc, distinguishing the current epistemic preorder,BeliefModality, proof transport, and Echo resource grades from confidentiality semantics.AUDIT.adoc.Proof-scope check
The issue body refers to 23
--safemodules. The current checkout has 17 Agda modules undersrc/EpistemicTypes/; the recursive proof script checks all 17 with--safe --without-K --no-libraries. The note reports the current count and makes no confidentiality claim based on those proofs.Validation
git diff --checkpassed.justnoragda, so I could not run the Agda gates here; please rely on the required CI proof and rejection-control jobs before merge.