Skip to content

Add docs for flags custom operators - #244

Draft
efahk wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
efahk_type_safe_prop
Draft

Add docs for flags custom operators#244
efahk wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
efahk_type_safe_prop

Conversation

@efahk

@efahk efahk commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adds some additional documentation to cover the new custom operators supported by feature flag runtime targeting

@mintlify

mintlify Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project Status Preview Updated
mixpanel-docs 🟢 Ready View Preview Sep 11, 2026, 7:16 PM

@greptile-apps

greptile-apps Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

RetriggerConfidence Score: 5/5

The PR appears safe to merge after an optional minor grammar correction.

Findings

  1. P2 Subject-Verb Agreement Error

Reviews (2) · Last reviewed commit: "cleanup"


If any of these conditions use a **Date** or **Semantic Version** type, as described in [Data types for runtime values](/docs/featureflags#data-types-for-runtime-values), ensure your SDK version meets the minimum supported: [`v0.24.0`](https://www.npmjs.com/package/mixpanel).

There is no minimum SDK version when using Remote Evaluation, since Mixpanel servers performs the comparison.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Subject-Verb Agreement Error

“Mixpanel servers performs” should be “Mixpanel servers perform.” This minor grammar error makes the new guidance look unpolished.

Suggested change
There is no minimum SDK version when using Remote Evaluation, since Mixpanel servers performs the comparison.
There is no minimum SDK version when using Remote Evaluation, since Mixpanel servers perform the comparison.

Note: If this suggestion doesn't match your team's coding style, reply to this and let me know. I'll remember it for next time!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant