Profile: AI systems, prompt engineering, orchestration, evaluation, and governance research. Canonical governance track: DGAF (Dynamic Governance Agentic Formation) Framework. Current evidence rule: project-defined terminology, deployment, benchmarks, and governance mappings are not treated as external certification or universal validation without reproducible evidence. README reconciliation: 2026-08-15

AI systems / orchestration practitioner based in Columbus, Ohio, building multi-agent systems, evaluation workflows, prompt systems, spatial/acoustic research, and governance-oriented tooling.

The repositories below are separate projects with different evidence boundaries. Cross-repository references describe relationships or intended integrations; they do not transfer validation status.

• LinkedIn
• GitHub

Claims across this ecosystem should distinguish:

DEFINED → IMPLEMENTED → COMPUTED → VERIFIED → ATTESTED → HISTORICAL → HYPOTHESIS → METAPHOR → UNSUPPORTED → DEPRECATED

Operational evidence may also be PENDING when a specific validation or synchronization action remains open. These labels describe evidence state; they are not interchangeable with project maturity or deployment status.

A deployment is not proof of correctness. A local test is evidence about the tested conditions. A benchmark table is not proof of derivation. A mapping to NIST, ISO, OWASP, or another external framework is not certification unless the applicable requirements and evidence establish it.

This is a curated portfolio index, not an exhaustive mirror of all 29 repositories in the connected owner inventory. The canonical mechanical inventory is maintained in docs/ECOSYSTEM_SYNC_MANIFEST_2026-08-15.md.

DGAF-Framework ── governance/evaluation research spine
       │
       ├── Sentinel / Driftwatch / Junior Apogee / ResumeApex
       ├── AOGA Dashboard
       └── related portfolio/evaluation artifacts

Acoustic-Mesh / ASIS ── separate acoustic + spatial intelligence track
ASIS = Acoustic Spatial Insight System
Meshsense / RuView Status ── runtime/deployment observation surface for the MeshSense branch
PDMAL / lattice work ── separate topology/lattice research track within DGAF
AHG Zeta-Pell ── separate Kalman + silver-ratio control simulation track
Agent Control Plane ── separate control-plane architecture track

These relationships do not imply that one project validates another.

aoga-dashboard has a READY production deployment and a configured Sentinel integration contract. The latest production deployment is explicitly bound to GitHub commit 7ef3f560f650fe63b6e40c2e9a38b96e39d3800d. This establishes a current source/deployment binding, not end-to-end correctness or orchestration behavior. Current retained runtime telemetry does not provide a dated end-to-end Sentinel transaction, so the dashboard should not be represented as having independently attested end-to-end Sentinel behavior until such a trace exists.

Historical DEP0169 (url.parse()) warnings were observed on dashboard API routes. Current retained telemetry does not establish recurrence or a definitive fix.

The canonical source repository is ndrorchestration/Meshsense. The corresponding Vercel project remains meshsense-ruview-status. These are two infrastructure identifiers for the same runtime/status surface, not separate systems.

The latest Vercel production deployment is READY, so deployment existence is verified. The inspected deployment metadata does not expose a GitHub commit binding; therefore exact GitHub-source/runtime equivalence remains PENDING. The prior failed Vercel deployment is retained as historical evidence rather than overwritten.

ASIS means Acoustic Spatial Insight System. Acoustic-mesh is the acoustic/WebRTC engineering track supporting the ASIS branch. Its implementation should be evaluated on acoustic sensing, signal processing, networking, and spatial-analysis evidence. Physical/acoustic validation remains a separate evidence gate. DGAF, Amethyst, and PDMAL relationships do not transfer validation to the acoustic system.

Historical repositories and archives remain useful for provenance but should not be presented as current authorities merely because they contain older benchmark, certification, or governance language.

Examples include:

• AI-Prompt-Engineer
• ai-prompt-engineering-portfolio
• prompt-optimization-library
• gold-star-qa-framework (archived)

entrepreneur-hub is a separate template/business track. Its governance and external-framework references should be interpreted as project mappings unless independently supported by applicable evidence. Commercial pricing, historical platform metrics, and deployment status require their own current provenance.

Developed by Ndr / Ender Hensel (ndrorchestration).

README evidence-alignment revision: 2026-08-15