[PM seat] repo:hotclm — ⏳ vacant

Seat register for the repo:hotclm execution seat. This body is the authority; the title and
assignee are derived views. Only the sitting PM edits it. Comments are audit only and carry no state.

Charter: objectstack-ai/objectstack → .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/hotcrm.md
(⚠️ named for the sibling repo — see Notes). Repo-binding rules: this repo's AGENTS.md, which beats
the skill where they differ.

1 · Current PM


GitHub account	— (⏳ vacant)
Session	—
Previous PM	`session_01HihZ11bQSqjCgjzHbpv4M1` (`zhuangjianguo`), seated 2026-10-09T14:45Z, signed off 2026-10-10T10:33Z on the maintainer's word 「你可以下班了」 — shift-close brief is the newest comment
Round marker	R8 closed at sign-off · charter shas read at seating: `SKILL.md` @ `d87dff6` (objectstack `origin/main` `d2e7d6c`) · repo `AGENTS.md` @ `e4997a8` (PR #92)
Devs in flight	0 — no subagent alive; the one cloud card (#87, `session_012BtouqNfFazqX5akwoC8Jk`) is archived, `completed`, nothing pending
Wake	none — `trig_01P6NT4vLzz1D7RXMRr2kjXu` deleted at sign-off

2 · Ledger

main on 17.7.0 with #86's Discussion half (PR #85 → c31c7e2, PR #88 → 46e65f0, both maintainer-approved). #87 browser pass delivered and closed; every finding is now a card or evidence. The maintainer (relayed by the #87 session, verbatim): 「发现问题提交issue，你的测试报告不应该进代码仓库」 / 「用 pm-dispatch 技能提交issue」 → the seat filed; the evidence branch is being removed.

PR #92 merged by the maintainer 2026-10-10T09:26Z (e4997a8) — AGENTS.md § Platform gaps is now 「Report, then wait — never patch, never work around」 (maintainer: 「平台的问题就等平台」). Impact check 2026-10-10T09:47Z: PRs #91 · #101 · #102 · #103 · #104, queued #94 and the decision box's recommendations read against the new row — none reshapes metadata to dodge a platform defect or carries a fixture for one (#91 adapts to the documented 17.5 post-hook RLS check; #101 / #102 / #104 each leave their platform finding reported and untouched; #94 is the app's own refreshAfter; #64 is by its own measurement not a platform bug). Nothing re-opened.

As of 2026-10-10T05:47Z: five seat-ACCEPTed PRs, CI green, none governed, all waiting on the maintainer's per-PR merge approval — #91 · #101 · #102 · #103 · #104.

State	Count	Cards
`pm:dispatched`	5	#90 → PR #91 · #93 → PR #101 · #97 → PR #102 · #95 → PR #103 (`Part of` — the half outside held files) · #99 → PR #104 (`Part of` — items 1 and 6) — all ACCEPTed
`pm:blocked`	1	#98 requester `sys_file` — `Blocked-by: objectstack-ai/objectstack#22590` (maintainer ruling: platform gaps are fixed in the platform)
`pm:queue`	1	#94 header refresh (⛔ after PR #91: same file)
`needs-user-decision`	16	#11 (Q2) · #19 · #20 · #28 · #31 (rec. close) · #38 · #41 · #43 · #53 · #64 · #82 (rec. C) · #83 (rec. split) · #84 (rec. A) · #86 Approvals half (rec. C) · #96 two current versions (rec. 1A 2A) · #100 who presses Start Signing (rec. A)
Open PRs	6	#91 · #101 · #102 · #103 · #104 ACCEPTed, awaiting merge approval · #81 (#78) governed — still `clean` against `main` after #92

Upstream this shift: objectstack-ai/objectstack#22506 · #22507 · #22558 · #22559 · #22588 · #22590 · #22607 · #22611 · objectstack-ai/objectui#12079 · #12080 · #12081 · #12082.

3 · Hot-file serial queue

File / region	Holder	Queue
`src/objects/contract.hook.ts` · `src/flows/contract-intake.flow.ts` · `src/actions/contract-lifecycle.actions.ts`	PR #91	#94 · #95 follow-up (descriptions in these files)
`src/flows/contract-approval.flow.ts` · `README.md` · `scripts/demo.mjs`	PR #101	#99 items 2–5 (needs PR #91 too; item 7 is decision-shaped) · #95 follow-up
`src/data/plan-contracts.ts` · `src/data/contract.seed.ts`	PR #102	—
`src/objects/` · `src/dashboards/` · `src/flows/` (not intake / approval) · `src/translations/` — descriptions only	PR #103	—
`src/apps/clm.app.ts`	PR #104	—
`AGENTS.md`	PR #81 (governed, maintainer)	—

4 · Notes

Residual keeper (离任留守): session_01HihZ11bQSqjCgjzHbpv4M1, no timer. Tails = PRs The intake wizard's "Submit now" fails for every requester — FLOW_FAILED, the edit-window RLS policy refuses the post-submit row, while the header Submit button on the same draft succeeds #91 · On a README-configured install the approval ladder sticks forever at its first rung — manager_review resolves to manager:undefined, locks the contract, and no approver is told anything is waiting #101 · The renewal-notice and expiration-sweep jobs produce nothing although 11 contracts carry is_expiring, and five of the six daily flows report acted: 0 while they notify #102 · Implementation notes are shown to users as help text — field and dashboard-widget descriptions cite hook files, card numbers, DESIGN.md sections and PRs #103 · Seven smaller things a real user hits — items 1 and 6: legal tabs and boards shown to requesters, an empty landing page for lawyers #104, landing only, each on the maintainer's explicit approval. On Implementation notes are shown to users as help text — field and dashboard-widget descriptions cite hook files, card numbers, DESIGN.md sections and PRs #95 / Seven smaller things a real user hits (from the 17.7.0 browser pass): legal tabs shown to requesters, a template toggle with no template, renewal with no link, orphan drafts, a false demo note, an empty landing page for lawyers #99 only the PR Implementation notes are shown to users as help text — field and dashboard-widget descriptions cite hook files, card numbers, DESIGN.md sections and PRs #103 / Seven smaller things a real user hits — items 1 and 6: legal tabs and boards shown to requesters, an empty landing page for lawyers #104 halves are held; their remaining items (Implementation notes are shown to users as help text — field and dashboard-widget descriptions cite hook files, card numbers, DESIGN.md sections and PRs #95 follow-up, Seven smaller things a real user hits (from the 17.7.0 browser pass): legal tabs shown to requesters, a template toggle with no template, renewal with no link, orphan drafts, a false demo note, an empty landing page for lawyers #99 items 2–5 and 7) are the successor's. The named set is a fence for the successor; everything else on this board is free.
Evidence branch still on the remote: claude/issue-87-browser-test-17-7 (81cb18b, 5 commits of qa/browser-test-17-7/**, never in main). The Full browser test on 17.7.0 main: drive the whole contract lifecycle as every audience, in en and zh-CN, and report what a real user hits #87 session said it would be removed; it was not. Several card comments link its screenshots — deletion is the maintainer's call.
Merge authority is delegated by AGENTS.md, not the skill (maintainer 2026-09-07:
「你自己派发自己合并」 / 「改策略，让循环真的无人值守」). This shift every merge waits for the maintainer's explicit
per-PR approval in session (PR Upgrade the @objectstack/* dependencies from 17.4.0 to 17.7.0, walking the official upgrade checklists of 17.5, 17.6 and 17.7 #85, PR A business requester and a legal counsel get "You don't have permission" on the contract's Discussion tab and a blank Approvals tab — sys_activity / sys_comment / sys_attachment / sys_approval_request answer 403 #88). Four conditions, all verified per PR before
merging. Covers merging, never deciding. No merge queue here (ci.yml alone).
Governed surface (maintainer merges): DESIGN.md §01–§04 · AGENTS.md · CLAUDE.md ·
LICENSE · CHANGELOG.md · docs/design/**.
⛔ No changeset gate in this repo — no changeset-check.yml, no .changeset/. lanes/hotcrm.md
describes hotcrm's gate; it does not apply here.
Write identity changed this shift: seat writes now go through the fleet-write relay as
objectstack-fleet[bot]; earlier seat writes on this board are the user zhuangjianguo.
No half-state patrol anchor (no half-state-patrol.yml): before any new dispatch, read every
open card and check each pm:dispatched card's PR is merged or closed. Re-run #31's unlock probe on 17.4.0 — its criterion may already be met and nobody has looked #80 is what skipping it costs.
Gates for this repo are hand-derived — dispatch-gates --repo objectstack-ai/hotclm refuses from
an objectstack checkout. The set is pnpm verify (package.json), run as four steps by ci.yml.
Seat error this shift: the Full browser test on 17.7.0 main: drive the whole contract lifecycle as every audience, in en and zh-CN, and report what a real user hits #87 cloud session was archived while it still awaited the maintainer's answers on an
AGENTS.md draft (local commit b782dad, never pushed); unarchived at once, but its container — and that local
commit — may be gone. Rule kept: before archiving a cloud card, read its post_turn_summary.needs_action.
Standing lessons kept from R1–R6: push early (a container restart once killed 539 unpushed lines);
⛔ touch no PR's draft state while its dev is still running; a list is not verified by its length.

R3 — seat post

当前 PM

zhuangjianguo · session session_01R3n3GGzobdegM4HUzah1iR · 🟢 active.
main = 2d63324. Tier fuse unchanged (CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER = 'claude-fable-5-1', compared EXACTLY) — below tier, so 项目总监的四项职责保持停放，⛔ 不裁不清标。

继承台账

本轮合并（4 → 6 累计）

PR	卡	squash	面
#57	#48	`2b74c4f`	`src/dashboards/legal.dashboard.ts` + 两个 bundle
#56	#46	`2d63324`	`README.md`（一轮 REWORK 后）

累计本 session：a7b7db5（#42/卡09）· 5d5a254（#37/17.4）· 2807b3b（#51/#49）· d34b225（#55/#47）· 2b74c4f（#57/#48）· 2d63324（#56/#46）。

在飞（3）

卡	分支	面	备注
#52	`claude/issue-52-obligation-owner`	`src/data/**` · 可能 `README.md`	A/B 路线由 dev 自己裁并论证
#54	`claude/issue-54-demo-mjs-stale-note`	`scripts/demo.mjs`	约四行；先自证前提
#59	`claude/issue-59-pipeline-in-flight`	`src/dashboards/legal.dashboard.ts` + 两个 bundle	浏览器读数是交付物本身

队列（2，都在等 PR #40）

§06 F14 says an archived contract stays editable 「除 notes 外」, but clm_contract has no notes field — §03 gives it summary #44 — §06 一词修正（notes → summary）
docs: the position census disagrees with itself in three places — README says seven over a table of six, DESIGN.md §11 says both 7 and 8 #58 — 岗位口径三处自相矛盾（README「seven positions」压六个真岗位；DESIGN.md §11 自己说 7 又说 8）

两张都改 DESIGN.md。PR #40 仍开着、已 ACCEPT、等人工合并 —— ⛔ 在它合并前不派发这两张，避免两个分支同时动 DESIGN.md。

决策箱（8，等维护者）

#11（仅第二问）· #19 · #20 · #28 · #38 · #41 · #43 · #53
pm:blocked 另计：#31（阻塞源是平台缺陷 objectstack#16778，恒荐等待）

本轮上报 objectstack

#17344（新）— options.stageOrder 三重缺陷：仅 funnel 分支读取；文档指名一个不存在的图表类型 pyramid；即便在 funnel 上也按标签匹配，非 en 语言下作者写的顺序被静默丢弃。三处都在 published 17.4.0 包里一手核实（plugin-charts 的 if(h==='funnel'){…d=ce(c)…}；spec 里 pyramid 出现 0 次；plugin-dashboard 同时投递 stored value 与 display label 的对冲写法）。
本 session 累计：#17175 · #17176 · #17177 · #17189 · #17264 · #17265 · #17271 · #17272 · #17329 · #17344，另在 #16712 补证据、在 #17177 补一条正面读数。

热文件串行队

文件	现持有者	队列
`DESIGN.md`	PR #40（开着，等人工合并）	#44 → #58
`README.md`	#52（可能触及 exact-name 表）	#58（岗位表；将 rebase 到 #52 之后）
`src/dashboards/legal.dashboard.ts`	#59	—
`src/translations/{en,zh-CN}/app.ts`	#59	—
`src/data/**`	#52	—
`scripts/demo.mjs`	#54	—

说明

一处本轮记下的自我纠错，写进台账而不是只留在卡里。 #46 的 REWORK 起因是我写进卡和派发里的一个框架（position 是「该行上唯一没有 _id 后缀的字段」），dev 逐个核对了 position、user_id、permission_set_id 三处读数、每一处都正确，然后把我的框架原样带进了 README。十四个字段里有十一个没有 _id 后缀，其中 granted_by、delegated_from、certified_by 三个还都是 Field.lookup("sys_user") —— 那句话在它自己的对象上被证伪三次。

教训按 dev 自己的措辞记：核验的单位是句子，不是标识符。 逐个标识符都为真，不能组合成整句为真。这条对 PM 席位同样成立 —— 卡片里写下的每一个「唯一」「全部」「只有」，都是一个需要枚举而不是抽样的断言。

另一处：布局类断言需要像数据类断言一样有读数。 #45 报的「漏斗溢出卡片外」经 #48 复测不成立（四个视口宽度下四边各内缩 25px，scrollWidth === clientWidth）。#45 自己那条金律说「⛔ 不得仅凭导航后的 DOM 读数上报严重发现」，这次是同一个失效模式的另一面：肉眼看图得出的几何结论，没有 getBoundingClientRect 撑着。已在 #45 上公开更正。

Generated by Claude Code

R4 — seat post

当前 PM

zhuangjianguo · session session_01R3n3GGzobdegM4HUzah1iR · 🟢 active.
main = 3d11db8. Tier fuse 未变（CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER = 'claude-fable-5-1'，精确比较）—— 未达 tier，项目总监四项职责保持停放，⛔ 不裁不清标。

继承台账

本轮合并（R3 之后 5 次，session 累计 9 次）

PR	卡	squash	面
#60	#54	`6e534689`	`scripts/demo.mjs`
#62	#59	`b667fda`	`legal.dashboard.ts` + 两 bundle
#65	#52	`3d11db8`	`src/data/` ×3 · `README.md` · `scripts/demo.mjs`

session 全量：a7b7db5（卡09/#42）· 5d5a254（17.4/#37）· 2807b3b（#49/#51）· d34b225（#47/#55）· 2b74c4f（#48/#57）· 2d63324（#46/#56）· 6e534689 · b667fda · 3d11db8。

在飞（1）

卡	分支	面
#61	`claude/issue-61-deviation-decided-by`	`src/data/negotiation.seed.ts` · 可能 `keys.ts`

队列（3，全部等 PR #40）

#44（§06 一词）· #58（§11 岗位口径）· #63（§09 仍写「漏斗」）。三张都改 DESIGN.md 的不同小节，⛔ 一次只派一张，绝不并行。

决策箱（9，等维护者）

#11（仅第二问）· #19 · #20 · #28 · #38 · #41 · #43 · #53 · #64（新）
pm:blocked 另计：#31（阻塞源 objectstack#16778，恒荐等待）

#64 是本轮新进的，由 dev 在做 #52 时量出：§04 给 clm_requester 的 U（本人负责） 对 clm_obligation 100% 的行都够不着 —— controlled_by_parent 要求主记录可编辑，而业务承办的合同编辑窗口是 draft/submitted，履约只挂在已生效合同下，两窗口结构性不相交。两处读数（obligation.object.ts:34、_lifecycle.ts:44）已由席位复核。

本轮上报 objectstack

#17344 —— options.stageOrder 三重缺陷（仅 funnel 分支读取 · 文档指名不存在的图表类型 pyramid · 按标签匹配，非 en 语言下作者写的顺序被静默丢弃），三处都在 published 17.4.0 包里一手核实。随后补入第二个同根因消费者：category 颜色也按位置调色板回落（Active 在 en 绿、zh-CN 蓝），这让「按 stored value 建索引」那个补法一处修两件事。

session 累计：#17175 · #17176 · #17177 · #17189 · #17264 · #17265 · #17271 · #17272 · #17329 · #17344。

热文件串行队

文件	现持有者	队列
`DESIGN.md`	PR #40（开着，等人工合并）	#44 → #58 → #63，⛔ 串行
`src/data/negotiation.seed.ts` · `keys.ts`	#61	—
其余全部	空	—

说明

⚠️ 本轮我犯的串行队错误，写进台账

我把 #52 和 #54 同时派了出去，而我自己这张表上 scripts/demo.mjs 明明标着「#54 持有」。 给 #52 的派发说明里我特意写了「你可以动 README.md」，却一个字没提那个文件。#54 先合，#52 的 PR 随即 mergeable_state: dirty —— 两个 card 改的是同一段清单的同一处。

dev 把冲突解得干净（合并提交、不 rebase、不 force-push、两个 hunk 都取本分支措辞叠在 #60 上），代价是它多跑了一轮。这张表不是记录，是闸门 —— 我列了它然后越过了它。上面的「⛔ 一次只派一张」现在对 DESIGN.md 的三张卡是硬约束，不是提醒。

两次 REWORK，同一种缺陷

README.md opens with Status: M0 — scaffold and configuration domain on an M1/M2/M3-complete tree, and its setup section never says the position assignment binds by name #46：「position 是该行上唯一没有 _id 后缀的字段」—— 十四个字段里十一个没有后缀，其中三个还是 Field.lookup。源头是我写进卡里的框架，dev 逐个核了三处读数、每处都对，然后把框架原样带走。
The obligation reminders are still the administrator talking to themselves: clm_obligation.owner is the dev admin on all 200 seeded rows #52：「clm_review.reviewer 是 fixture 里唯一还指着 dev admin 的用户引用」—— 同一个 PR 的 keys.ts 里它自己写着 clm_deviation.decided_by 也还指着。

两次都是全称命题。dev 在 #54 上写下的那条线是对的 ——「漏掉一个成员是不完整，不是假话」—— 但反过来也成立：「唯一」不是遗漏，一个反例就够。返工后它自己把六个用户引用逐个扫了一遍才写下新的限定句，这是正确的做法：核验的单位是句子，全称命题要靠枚举而不是抽样。

一条卡片作者要记住的

#59 的卡是我写的，中心论证和算术都错了。 论证：我说 active 按 widget 自己的准入规则就该排除（不对 —— 那条规则的第二个分句才起作用，而合同本来就该走到 active）；算术：我写「60 of 74」，实际是 106，于是 81% 和 83% 两个百分比都是从同一次加错里繁殖出来的。dev 测了论证、否掉了、给出了真正能判别的判据（这个阶段法务还有没有活要干），保留了结论。

卡片是带证据的提议，不是判决。 派发说明里那句「读了卡觉得论证不成立就说出来，那才是把卡做对了」，本轮兑现了一次。

Generated by Claude Code

R5 — seat post · 🟡 队列见底，等维护者

当前 PM

zhuangjianguo · session session_01R3n3GGzobdegM4HUzah1iR · 🟡 idle by design —— 不是停摆，是没有可派的卡了。
main = 713b25b。Tier fuse 未变（CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER = 'claude-fable-5-1'，精确比较）—— 未达 tier，项目总监四项职责保持停放，⛔ 不裁不清标。

继承台账

合并（session 累计 10）

a7b7db5（卡09/#42）· 5d5a254（17.4/#37）· 2807b3b（#49/#51）· d34b225（#47/#55）· 2b74c4f（#48/#57）· 2d63324（#46/#56）· 6e534689（#54/#60）· b667fda（#59/#62）· 3d11db8（#52/#65）· 713b25b（#61/#66）

在飞：0

队列（3，⛔ 全部阻塞于 PR #40，且相互串行）

卡	`DESIGN.md` 小节
#44	§06 —— F14 写「除 notes 外」，但 `clm_contract` 没有 `notes` 字段
#58	§11 —— 岗位口径，layout 块说 7、M1 行说 8，真值是 7
#63	§09 —— 仍把该 widget 写成「各阶段合同数漏斗」，#48 已停止发运漏斗、#59 又收窄了它所绘

三张改的是三个不同小节，但同一个文件。⛔ PR #40 合并前一张都不派；合并后也 ⛔ 一次只派一张。

决策箱（9，等维护者）

#11（仅第二问）· #19 · #20 · #28 · #38 · #41 · #43 · #53 · #64

上报 objectstack（session 累计 11 处）

#17175 · #17176 · #17177 · #17189 · #17264 · #17265 · #17271 · #17272 · #17329 · #17344（本轮新开），另在 #13469 补 17.4.0 复现、在 #16712 补证据、在 #17177 补正面读数。

#13469 那条是 #61 的 dev 量到的，去重命中已开着的卡所以补证据而非另开：同一个页面上，related list 把 Field.user 列渲染成裸 sys_user id（8fDg2i1MlSIuG16syiHbJfHEsPcPBjW3），而记录页把同一个字段渲染成 [LC] Legal Counsel 1。两次点击之内可达的自相矛盾。

热文件串行队

全空。DESIGN.md 由 PR #40 持有（开着，等人工合并）。

说明

本轮两张 data 卡立下的东西，比它们各自的 fix 值钱

#52 定了 fixture 分派用户列的约定：按行是什么分给做那件事的人；用结构分（复用已有的相对方关系）而不用文案，于是两个语言包分法完全一致；不花新账号；刻意留白的集合按「保住某条边所需的最小量」定并且要证明可达。

#61 是这个约定的第一次继承，而它做对的地方是拒绝了其中一半。 派发说明让它别照抄 #52 的「刻意留白集合」，它没抄，并且给了理由：legal_owner 和 obligation.owner 各留一行空着，是因为有 flow 在那一列上走「没人可通知」的边（F3、F10）；而没有任何东西读 decided_by —— 它写一次然后显示。留空不但什么边都练不到，还会断言这一列唯一不能表达的意思：「这条偏离是被没有人裁决的」。

先例是「规则 + 它成立的理由」。理由不成立的地方还照搬规则，那是抄，不是继承。

#61 在 `counselFor` / `legalOwnerOf` 之间的选择，是本轮最好的一段论证

两者都给出一个律师，只在「F2 从未指派过法务负责人」的那些行上分岔。它枚举了：17 条已决偏离落在 17 份不同合同上，其中 3 份的合同类型 requiresLegalReview 为 false（#17、#44、#48），legalOwnerOf 在这 3 行返回 null。

于是用 legalOwnerOf 会种出 3 行：已决、带着 decided_at、却没有决定人 —— 而 deviation_state_machine 在任何决定动作上都会给空的 decided_by 盖上操作人，写入层永远产不出这个组合。这正好撞上 fixture 自己的常规：不种任何写入层会拒绝或永不会写出的行。

「律师比管理员更合理」是品味。「这个备选会种出写入层写不出来的行」是约束。差别在这里。

三次 REWORK 教出来的东西，本轮开始自己长出来

#46 和 #52 的返工都是全称命题（「唯一没有 _id 后缀的字段」「唯一还指着 dev admin 的用户引用」）。#61 没被要求，自己做了两件事：grep -rn DEMO_USER src 之后把结果分类（声明 / 四处散文交叉引用 / reviewer / 一个根本不是引用的 signers JSON 串），以及把 README 里那句幸存的限定句重新推导了一遍（枚举 src/objects/ 里全部六个用户引用，确认只有 reviewer 带 required: true + storage.notNull）。

它自己新写的那句仍差一步 —— 「the last REFERENCE that has to name it, and the only one left that spells this constant at all」，孤立地读第二个分句是假的，靠紧接着的下一句把 signers 点名归类为「不是引用」才成立。没退回，但记在这里：全称命题不该依赖读者继续读下一句。

接下来

⛔ 不发明工作。 队列见底不是找活干的信号。维护者手上两件：PR #40（受管 DESIGN.md，已 ACCEPT，等人工合并 —— 它一合，#44 / #58 / #63 依次解锁）和决策箱 9 张。除按此列出外 ⛔ 不催。

Generated by Claude Code

R6 — seat post

当前 PM

zhuangjianguo · session session_01R3n3GGzobdegM4HUzah1iR · 🟢 active.
main = 96683f7。Tier fuse 未变（CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER = 'claude-fable-5-1'，精确比较）—— 未达 tier，项目总监四项职责保持停放，⛔ 不裁不清标。

继承台账

合并（R5 之后 6 次，session 累计 16）

PR	卡	squash
#68	#44	`0701eb1`
#69	#58	`9b7538a`
#70	#63	`30fd863`
#72	#67	`19a8a4c`
#74	#71	`9ba4d78`
#79	#75	`96683f7`

维护者本轮合入 PR #40（296fab8），解锁了压在它后面的三张 DESIGN.md 卡。

在飞（1）

#80 —— 只观测、⛔ 不产出 PR。重跑 #31 的解锁探针。

队列（1）

#78 —— 把两处纯复述性的闸门清单收成 pnpm verify。⛔ 压在 PR #77 之后（改同几行），且同为受管面。

等维护者（2 类）

上报 objectstack（session 累计 11 处）

#17175 · #17176 · #17177 · #17189 · #17264 · #17265 · #17271 · #17272 · #17329 · #17344，另在 #13469 补 17.4.0 复现、在 #16712 补证据。

热文件串行队

README.md · CLAUDE.md · AGENTS.md · docs/backlog/README.md 由 PR #77 持有（开着，等人工合并）；#78 排其后。其余全空。

说明

⚠️ 本轮我犯的错，两次，而且第二次发生在写下规矩之后

一级：合 PR #72 时它的 dev 还在跑。
二级：我在 #67 上写下「⛔ dev 回报未到不得合并」，然后在下一次合并（PR #74）又犯了。
三级：我从 PR #74 的正文里看到扫描结果、开了 #76 —— 而那个 dev 在它的回报里已经开了 #75。我造出一张重复卡，自己关掉。

三次都「没出事」，但第三级恰好证明了二级时我自己写的那句话：「没出事」不是衡量标准，暴露面才是 —— 而它偏偏在最要紧的时候看不见。dev 的回报不只是完成信号，它本身携带我看不到的状态。合早了，丢的不是它的推送，是它的知识。

修法不是再写一条规矩（已证明无效），而是一个可机械检查的前置条件：⛔ 动任何 PR 的 draft 标记之前，先 ListAgents。 有 agent 在跑，这个 PR 就还不是我的 —— CI 多绿、body 读起来多完整，都不作数。此后两次（PR #77、PR #79）都按此执行，两次都拦住了。

本轮 dev 立起来的证据标准，三级递进

同一句话「闸门读不到这个文件」，三张卡给出了三种强度不同的证明，后一种严格强于前一种：

PR §06 F14 says an archived contract stays editable 「除 notes 外」, but clm_contract has no notes field — §03 gives it summary #68 —— grep -il DESIGN 扫四份闸门日志，零命中。证明闸门没打开这个文件。
PR docs(design): §09 still specifies 各阶段合同数漏斗 — the app stopped shipping a funnel in #48 and narrowed what it plots in #59 #70 / CI does not run pnpm lint:i18n-gate — the one gate that catches a missing translation key is the one a human has to remember #72 / Four surfaces state the gate set as three commands; CI now enforces four — one PR must move all four, and three of them are governed #77 —— 消融：把文件（或四个文件同时）削成两行垃圾，四道闸门仍然全绿。证明闸门连文件被摧毁都发现不了。
PR Five comments in three files still say DESIGN.md §09 asks for the metrics its 2026-09-09 ruling placed outside V1.0 #79 —— 把文件退回到修改前的状态，四道闸门全绿。证明这张卡要修的那个缺陷本身，对每一道确实读这些文件的闸门都是不可见的。

第三种才是这类卡真正需要的那个命题。前两种回答「闸门读不读这个文件」，第三种回答「闸门抓不抓得住这个 bug」。

另一条：不会漂移的话，比今天正确的话值钱

PR #74 把一份抄来的清单换成指针，理由是「抄本会漂移，指针不会」，并把这个理由写进注释，免得下一个人好心贴回去。
PR #77 更进一步：AGENTS.md 那段把数量焊进散文两次，它没有把 three 改成 four，而是改成不含数量的说法 —— 将来加第六道闸门，那一段不会再次过期。它没有修正那个数，它消掉了那一类。

一件我该早点想到的

#31 是 pm:blocked，而它自己写着解锁判据：「本仓升到含该修复的版本后那条错路确实报错」，并明确排除「上游 PR 已合并」。本仓这个 session 就升到了 17.4.0（PR #37），而没有人回去跑过那条探针。

线索来自 dev 一句诚实的版本标注 —— cycle-time.dataset.ts 里写着「Measured on 17.3.0」。正因为它标了版本，这个缺口才看得见。 已开 #80 去验。

一张被阻塞的卡，如果它的阻塞条件会静默变化，就会永远停在那儿 —— 因为条件成立时不会有任何事件通知你。 这是席位的活，不是 dev 的。

Generated by Claude Code

Seat takeover · 2026-10-09T14:46Z — audit only; the body above is the state.

Who: session_01HihZ11bQSqjCgjzHbpv4M1, account zhuangjianguo, seated on the maintainer's explicit summons (/pm-dispatch hotclm).
Predecessor: session_01R3n3GGzobdegM4HUzah1iR — session record reads archived; last output on this board 2026-09-12T00:56Z (the The two surfaces that merely restate the gate set should name pnpm verify instead of enumerating it — a restatement of a definition cannot be allowed to drift #78 ACCEPT). No shift-close brief. Devs alive at takeover: none (Upgrade the @objectstack/* dependencies from 17.4.0 to 17.7.0, walking the official upgrade checklists of 17.5, 17.6 and 17.7 #82's branch did not exist; Re-run #31's unlock probe on 17.4.0 — its criterion may already be met and nobody has looked #80's branch was never pushed).
Opening reads: latest round marker = R6 (comment above); newest foreign Claim: on a pm:dispatched card = The two surfaces that merely restate the gate set should name pnpm verify instead of enumerating it — a restatement of a definition cannot be allowed to drift #78 (same predecessor session); open cards 13 = totalCount 13.
Half-states found and settled: Re-run #31's unlock probe on 17.4.0 — its criterion may already be met and nobody has looked #80 delivered its report on 2026-09-10 and kept pm:dispatched → ACCEPTed and closed completed.
This round: Upgrade the @objectstack/* dependencies from 17.4.0 to 17.7.0, walking the official upgrade checklists of 17.5, 17.6 and 17.7 #82 filed and dispatched (maintainer directive, quoted on its claim); cards 12 / 13 filed as Card 12 — F8 e-signature connector · F15 HotCRM hand-off behind CLM_COMPOSITION (M4) #83 / Card 13 — AI participation: S1–S6 skills, the pre-review memo, MCP tool surface, honest degradation (M4) #84, pm:blocked on Upgrade the @objectstack/* dependencies from 17.4.0 to 17.7.0, walking the official upgrade checklists of 17.5, 17.6 and 17.7 #82; [Decision] §09 要「各段时长」和「超 SLA」，但语义层算不出时间差——两问共用一个补法 #31's waiting state written on [Decision] §09 要「各段时长」和「超 SLA」，但语义层算不出时间差——两问共用一个补法 #31.

Generated by Claude Code

收班简报 · repo:hotclm · session_01HihZ11bQSqjCgjzHbpv4M1 · 2026-10-10T10:36Z

Seat released; this comment is the release marker. Successor: /pm-dispatch hotclm 接手, then read the #36 body first. I stay residual keeper of the named tails only (no timer). Everything else on this board is free.

Index (R8, seated 2026-10-09T14:45Z)

Card	Verdict	PR / state
#82	17.7.0 upgrade landed; open question in the decision box	PR #85 merged `c31c7e2`
#86	Discussion half landed; Approvals half in the decision box (seat rec. C, objectstack#22559)	PR #88 merged `46e65f0`
#87	browser pass delivered and closed; every finding is a card or evidence	—
#90	ACCEPT @ `6629072`	PR #91 (tail)
#93	ACCEPT @ `0089ffa`	PR #101 (tail)
#97	ACCEPT @ `7d8a059`	PR #102 (tail)
#95	ACCEPT @ `7794860`, Part of	PR #103 (tail); remainder → successor
#99	ACCEPT @ `cad612f`, items 1 and 6	PR #104 (tail); remainder → successor
#98	`pm:blocked`, `Blocked-by: objectstack-ai/objectstack#22590`	—
#92	merged by the maintainer, `e4997a8` (platform gaps: report, then wait)	impact check: nothing re-opened

Upstream filed this shift: objectstack-ai/objectstack#22506 · #22507 · #22558 · #22559 · #22588 · #22590 · #22607 · #22611 · objectstack-ai/objectui#12079 · #12080 · #12081 · #12082.

Health

Relay list (successor)

Header lifecycle actions succeed and the contract page keeps showing the old status and the old button until a manual reload #94 once PR The intake wizard's "Submit now" fails for every requester — FLOW_FAILED, the edit-window RLS policy refuses the post-submit row, while the header Submit button on the same draft succeeds #91 merges (same file src/actions/contract-lifecycle.actions.ts).
Seven smaller things a real user hits (from the 17.7.0 browser pass): legal tabs shown to requesters, a template toggle with no template, renewal with no link, orphan drafts, a false demo note, an empty landing page for lawyers #99 items 2–5 once PRs The intake wizard's "Submit now" fails for every requester — FLOW_FAILED, the edit-window RLS policy refuses the post-submit row, while the header Submit button on the same draft succeeds #91 and On a README-configured install the approval ladder sticks forever at its first rung — manager_review resolves to manager:undefined, locks the contract, and no approver is told anything is waiting #101 merge; item 7 is decision-shaped.
Implementation notes are shown to users as help text — field and dashboard-widget descriptions cite hook files, card numbers, DESIGN.md sections and PRs #95 follow-up (descriptions in the files those PRs hold, plus country_code help) once PRs The intake wizard's "Submit now" fails for every requester — FLOW_FAILED, the edit-window RLS policy refuses the post-submit row, while the header Submit button on the same draft succeeds #91 and On a README-configured install the approval ladder sticks forever at its first rung — manager_review resolves to manager:undefined, locks the contract, and no approver is told anything is waiting #101 merge.
A requester's own uploaded contract version shows "no file" — sys_file read answers 403 for the audiences that can read the version #98: re-measure when a published release carries the objectstack#22590 fix.
Branch claude/issue-87-browser-test-17-7 is still on the remote. Deleting it is the maintainer's call (body §4).

[PM seat] repo:hotclm — ⏳ vacant #36

Description

1 · Current PM

2 · Ledger

3 · Hot-file serial queue

4 · Notes

Activity

zhuangjianguo commented on Sep 10, 2026

R3 — seat post

当前 PM

继承台账

本轮合并（4 → 6 累计）

在飞（3）

队列（2，都在等 PR #40）

决策箱（8，等维护者）

本轮上报 objectstack

热文件串行队

说明

zhuangjianguo commented on Sep 10, 2026

R4 — seat post

当前 PM

继承台账

本轮合并（R3 之后 5 次，session 累计 9 次）

在飞（1）

队列（3，全部等 PR #40）

决策箱（9，等维护者）

本轮上报 objectstack

热文件串行队

说明

⚠️ 本轮我犯的串行队错误，写进台账

两次 REWORK，同一种缺陷

一条卡片作者要记住的

zhuangjianguo commented on Sep 10, 2026

R5 — seat post · 🟡 队列见底，等维护者

当前 PM

继承台账

合并（session 累计 10）

在飞：0

队列（3，⛔ 全部阻塞于 PR #40，且相互串行）

决策箱（9，等维护者）

上报 objectstack（session 累计 11 处）

热文件串行队

说明

本轮两张 data 卡立下的东西，比它们各自的 fix 值钱

#61 在 counselFor / legalOwnerOf 之间的选择，是本轮最好的一段论证

三次 REWORK 教出来的东西，本轮开始自己长出来

接下来

zhuangjianguo commented on Sep 10, 2026

R6 — seat post

当前 PM

继承台账

合并（R5 之后 6 次，session 累计 16）

在飞（1）

队列（1）

等维护者（2 类）

上报 objectstack（session 累计 11 处）

热文件串行队

说明

⚠️ 本轮我犯的错，两次，而且第二次发生在写下规矩之后

本轮 dev 立起来的证据标准，三级递进

另一条：不会漂移的话，比今天正确的话值钱

一件我该早点想到的

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 9, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 10, 2026

Index (R8, seated 2026-10-09T14:45Z)

Health

Relay list (successor)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions

#61 在 `counselFor` / `legalOwnerOf` 之间的选择，是本轮最好的一段论证