[PM seat] repo:hotcrm — ⏳ vacant

[os-steve]

Protocol carrier for the repo:hotcrm execution seat. ⛔ Not dispatchable work. The body is authoritative; its single writer is the sitting PM, and the seat is now vacant. Title and assignee are derived views. Stamp 2026-10-04T13:44Z.

The previous body (the R69–R73 ledger, §5 facts 1–11) is kept in this post's body revision of 2026-10-03T23:44Z. Older bodies (R61–R63, facts 1–37) are in the revisions before 2026-10-02. ⛔ Neither is restated here.

1. Current PM

field	value
Current PM	⏳ vacant. No assignee
Last PM	session_01ER8ntXZhYebyQ66aXWdjfT (GET /user = hotlong, writing as objectstack-fleet[bot] through the relay). Seated 2026-10-02T21:40Z, rounds R69–R73. Signed off 2026-10-04T13:44Z on the maintainer's word in chat: 「你可以下班了」
Wake	The self-bound Routine trig_01NN5DaMTJEg5aaxxof1pLoX is deleted. No timer of this seat remains
Successor	/pm-dispatch hotcrm (or 接手). Read this body first, then the sign-off brief below it
Seat	repo:hotcrm, a single-lane repo. ⛔ No domain:*. Charter: references/lanes/hotcrm.md
⚠️ Standing direction	The maintainer's 「hotcrm延后，先处理平台」: no new hotcrm card is dispatched unless the maintainer asks for it

2. Handover ledger (snapshot at sign-off)

main = 4054ec26. Open PRs: 0. In flight: 0 (no claim, no dev branch, no dev session). Unreleased changesets on main: 36.

state	cards	note
pm:queue	#2007 · #1952 · #1805	#2007: held under 「hotcrm延后，先处理平台」, so dispatch only on the maintainer's word. #1952: a decision held for the next src/sales ceiling hit (Track A chain); the label is a misfit and the card is ⛔ not dispatchable. #1805: its file is fenced by epic #1579 F5 (#1586)
pm:on-hold	#1992 · #2000 · #1822 · #1975	#1992: Restart-when: hotcrm main pins @objectstack/objectql above 17.6.0 and that package's CHANGELOG.md contains #21646 (comment 5977419622). The fix is objectstack be55fd29 (objectstack#21661), merged and not yet published; npm latest = 17.6.0 at sign-off. The wake dispatch is pre-written in that comment. The others keep their own Restart-when: lines
pm:blocked	#1919 · #1907 · #1210 · #1199	Each carries its Blocked-by: line. #1919 also carries finding
pm:epic	#1904 · #1579 (subtree #1581–#1587, #1595) · #1826	Other seats' territory, ⛔ fenced
pm:awaiting-maintainer · needs-user-decision	none

3. ⏳ Awaiting the maintainer (⛔ never nagged)

1. A fresh boot drops 2 demo campaigns and all 21 of their members: campaign.hook.ts refuses the seeded in_progress campaigns as having no start/end date #2007: dispatch when 「hotcrm延后，先处理平台」 is lifted.
2. Release: optional. 36 changesets are unreleased on main (changeset version plus a v*.*.* tag).
3. Grant manage_org_presentation to tenant_admin once the capability ships in a released @objectstack line #1369: cosmetic. The closed card still lists os-musk, which the relay cannot unassign.

4. Hot-file serial queue

• ⛔ Fenced, other seats: epic Epic: bring this repo's test farm back under the 2026-08-31 ruling — platform-first, os lint --strict first, then retire the local re-implementations by family #1579's subtree (Turn on os lint --strict in this repo's verify chain and prove the gate reds (epic #1579, step 2b — the half that needs a release) #1581–Retire the local hook / action / flow write-shape tests the platform's *-body-write-* and flow-node-write rules already enforce (epic #1579, step 3, family F6) #1587, Replace the hand-built hook / flow / action harnesses with @objectstack/verify's in-process handle; delete the stand-ins and the suites that only prove the stand-ins; declare the platform packages tests import (epic #1579, step 5) #1595), including test/authorization-coverage.test.ts (Retire the local security / sharing / org-axis coverage tests the platform's security-* and sharing-rule-* rules already enforce (epic #1579, step 3, family F5) #1586 F5's file).
• In-lane holds: none.
• Open product question, no ruling (⛔ not a card): none left. The lead/case empty-group question was ruled in R73 (Lead and case detail pages: show the sections a user is expected to fill even while empty (hideEmpty: false), the way #1211 did for the opportunity page #2003 → PR fix(record-pages): keep the lead's and case's empty to-fill sections on screen #2005).

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-steve]

Round 12 opened — session_01WMzCeNC4SZcPNBpE2zCVCg, 2026-08-27T09:40Z. Same seat, continuing directly from round 11's shift-end brief above (readings 1–4 resolve to this session; no handover occurred).

Batch of 3, all premises re-measured on main @ 3e1b00b and holding:

card	surface	tier
#1357	test/source-hygiene-header-position.test.ts — one sentence at :249	opus · S
#1115	test/object-validation-predicates.test.ts — static half only	opus · M (⚠️ fable tier unavailable, quota)
#909	content/docs/guides/integrations.mdx ×3 locales — behind a browser gate	opus · M

Disjoint by file, all three: two different test/ files (different suites, no shared barrel) and one docs page. ⛔ No hot-file serialisation owed this round.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-steve]

⚠️ Second actor in this lane — #1361 / PR #1362, maintainer direct-dispatch. ⛔ Not this seat's, and not touched.

Appeared at 11:47Z, after round 11's shift-end brief was written. Recording it because the brief above says the lane was idle, and that is no longer the whole picture.

field	value
Card	#1361 — SaaS multi-org composition (catalog-only tenant replay, walled-posture admin profile)
Assignee	os-zhuang — ⛔ not this seat. Assignee is not me ⇒ never touched.
Channel	Maintainer direct-dispatch (standing 2026-08-10 authorisation), rulings quoted on the epic
Parent	epic objectstack-ai/objectstack#12701
PR	#1362, draft

Surface held by that PR, and it is disjoint from everything this seat has in flight

.changeset/saas-multi-org-composition.md
objectstack.config.ts
src/data/index.ts
src/profiles/tenant-admin.profile.ts      (new)
test/hook-org-inheritance.test.ts         (new)
test/saas-composition.test.ts             (new)

Round 12's three cards hold test/source-hygiene-header-position.test.ts (#1357), test/object-validation-predicates.test.ts (#1115) and content/docs/guides/integrations.mdx (#909). No intersection. Three different files under test/ is not a collision — there is no shared barrel or registry between those suites.

⚠️ One coupling checked and cleared rather than assumed: #909's dev boots the app to verify Setup → Integrations, and #1362 edits objectstack.config.ts. That would matter if #1362 changed the default composition — it does not. Its own changeset states the community shape is unchanged and the new shape is opt-in behind HOTCRM_COMPOSITION=saas, with no runtime branch and no enterprise package. #909 verifies the community default, so the two do not meet. ⭐ Also worth noting for this seat's charter: enhancement-only, community-runnable is exactly the dual-edition rule this lane is supposed to hold, and that PR appears to hold it.

For whoever reads this next

⛔ Do not treat #1361 as dispatchable, do not reclaim it, and do not review PR #1362. It is claimed by the maintainer's own channel, and an assignee that is not this seat is the end of the question. If a future round finds it stale, the recovery path is asking the maintainer, ⛔ not stale-claim reclaim — the direct-dispatch channel does not answer to this seat's timers.

Round 12 liveness — ⚠️ all three devs are far past this lane's baseline

Measured at 12:42Z, ~3h after dispatch:

card	remote branch	PR	report
#1357	none	none	none
#1115	exists, still at base 3e1b00b (probe push only)	none	none
#909	none	none	none

This lane's measured dispatch-to-PR baseline from round 11 is 12–35 minutes across five cards. Status probes sent to all three; all three queued for delivery, which means the agents exist and have a next tool round — ⛔ so this is not a death finding, and no reclaim is warranted. #909's browser gate makes a long run genuinely plausible for that one; the other two are harder to explain.

⛔ Recording rather than acting: the probe reply is the evidence, not the silence. Next step is whatever comes back.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-steve]

⛔ Correction to the liveness note above — wall-clock is not a liveness predicate in this environment.

The #1357 dev answered the probe immediately, alive and healthy, and told me something that invalidates how I read the table above:

I have no way to see a 3-hour gap from inside this run — from my side this is roughly the seventh tool call since dispatch. Treat the wall-clock discrepancy as a scheduling/queueing fact on your side, not as work in progress here.

⇒ The ~3h gap was scheduler queueing, not agents working slowly or dying. Seven tool calls is a normal early-run step count. My "far past this lane's baseline" reading conflated elapsed wall-clock with work performed, and those are only the same thing when agents run continuously — which, measured, they do not here.

What this breaks, and it is a rule this seat wrote yesterday

Round 11's shift-end brief records a dispatch-to-PR baseline of 12–35 minutes and offers it to the next PM as a liveness instrument. ⚠️ That number is a wall-clock measurement taken under round 11's scheduling conditions, and it does not transfer. Under queueing, a perfectly healthy agent can show zero remote artefacts for hours. Using the baseline as a death predicate would have had this seat reclaiming live claims and pushing a second agent into an occupied worktree — the precise harm the "45 minutes is a probe threshold, ⛔ not a death threshold" rule exists to prevent.

⭐ The protocol's own design is what saved it: probe first, and take the answer as the evidence. Silence proved nothing, and the probe cost one message. The rule was right and my inference from the table was wrong.

Carried forward as a method lesson

⛔ Never read elapsed wall-clock as agent progress. Positive evidence of liveness is a probe reply, a pushed branch, a PR or a report — never the passage of time, and never the absence of one of those. Where a baseline is recorded in minutes, it measures this lane's work, not this scheduler's latency, and the two decouple without warning.

The liveness table above stands as a factual record of what the remote showed at 12:42Z. ⛔ Its "far past baseline" framing does not — read it as "no remote artefacts yet", which is all it ever measured. #1357 has since pushed its branch; probes to #1115 and #909 are outstanding, and their silence likewise proves nothing either way.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-steve]

Round 13 opened — session_01WMzCeNC4SZcPNBpE2zCVCg, 2026-08-27T13:20Z. Continuing directly from round 12's brief; no handover. Final round of this shift — the seat closes once these three land.

card	surface	tier
#1363	test/flow-scheduled-org-partition.test.ts	opus · M (⚠️ gate semantics; contract tier unavailable — "prove it red" enforced literally)
#1345	scripts/check-source-token-ratchet.mjs — stripping-rule paragraph	opus · S
#949	test/docs-dashboard-tiles.test.ts + content/docs/service/cases.zh-Hant.mdx	opus · M

Disjoint by file. ⛔ No hot-file serialisation owed.

⚠️ Two stale premises caught before dispatch — both would have cost a run

1. [观察] 磁贴口径规则有两个盲区：只扫 analytics/dashboards 三页（service 页的同类引用无人检查），且 TILE_WORDS 不认 zh-Hant 实际在用的「磁磚」 #949's card AND its triage comment both name the wrong file. They place DOC_PAGES/TILE_WORDS in test/docs-drift.test.ts at :572/:608. That suite has since been split into 24 test/docs-*.test.ts files; the constants now live in test/docs-dashboard-tiles.test.ts (:68, :104), contents unchanged. ⇒ A dev following either document would have found nothing where two independent sources agreed it would be. ⭐ Two agreeing sources are not a second measurement when the second copied the first.
2. The ratchet header claims its scanner is cross-checked against the TypeScript compiler's comment-trivia ranges — there is no such cross-check anywhere in the repo, and the declared devDependency makes a shallow check confirm it #1345's blockers are cleared — PRs test(ratchet): read the buffer and the ceilings from the gate, not from prose beside it #1341 and test(hygiene): declare the source-hygiene gate's scan surface once #1343 are both merged, which was its ⛔ "do not start before" condition.

⭐ And a near-miss worth recording, because it is this family's own shape turned on the PM: my first probe for #1345 grepped from 'typescript' and returned 1 hit, appearing to falsify the card's "0 executable imports". It is at test/source-token-ratchet.test.ts:55, inside the docstring prose discussing that very import. The card was right and my grep answered a different question. ⇒ Carried into the dispatch order so the dev does not read the same hit as a falsification.

✅ #1345's falsifiable premise checked and TRUE: the suite docstring genuinely records the hand esbuild equivalence run (286 files, 0 divergent, 1,495,852 chars removed) and why it is not automated. The ruling's route is available; ⛔ no fork.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-steve]

✅ Handover check: main @ 1e40d16 is GREEN — 6/6 checks terminal success, verified after the last of the shift's eleven PRs merged.

The lane is handed over clean: no in-flight work, no card assigned to this seat, no open PR of this seat's, no ungraded finding, and a green main. ⛔ The one thing this seat did not audit is #1369 — see the brief.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[hotlong]

Round 18 opened — seat taken from VACANT. session_018Z7RPTnPnXsb8RUBr4yDjE, GitHub identity hotlong, 2026-09-02.

Audit record; the body carries the state.

Open-round mutual exclusion — four readings, all clear

reading	value	verdict
1. latest shift-end brief	body revision 2026-08-31T06:31:08Z, 🔵 VACANT, os-trump / session_01QaBNJyp9XkRodoRNfGuUTo, quota exhausted	explicit release marker, and the latest seat event ⇒ sit
2. newest round-open marker after it	none (last is R17 at 04:10Z, before the brief)	clear
3. newest non-self Claim: on a lane pm:dispatched card	all four are os-trump, all older than the brief	clear
4. newest CLOSED card's Claim:	#1445, session_c5c0ce54-…, cloud epic PM, cross-lane takeover of a single blocker, already ACCEPTed and merged (PR #1451, merged_at 2026-09-02T19:20:30Z)	cross-seat work, ⛔ not seat occupancy ⇒ clear

⚠️ Reading 4 is the only one that needed judgement. That claim is dated after the brief, so a mechanical read of "newest claim wins" would have self-yielded. It says in its own first line "this one card only, back to the lane afterwards", and the protocol's carve-out is explicit: a claim that is not this seat's lane dispatch does not hold the seat. Recording the reasoning rather than the conclusion, because a wrong call here either duplicates a live seat or freezes an empty one.

Manual half-state patrol at round open — and it found four, not zero

Full-lane intersection read across all 77 open cards plus all open PRs.

check	reading
open PRs authored by a dev of this seat	0 — all six open PRs are dependabot
cards with pm:dispatched	4 (#1405 · #1144 · #1214 · #1184), all assigned os-trump, no live agent behind any of them
finding label co-existing with a pm-state	4 (#1422 · #1428 · #1435 · #1436)
naked cards (no pm:*, no needs-user-decision)	3 (#1408 · #1439 · #1443)
ungraded finding	4 (#655 · #1440 · #1444 · #1450)

⛔ The brief's §4 is where I part company with my predecessor, and it is a state-machine question, not a bookkeeping one. §4 argues all three (it counted 3; there are 4) should keep pm:dispatched because "clearing the label would lose the record that items remain."

That reasoning is wrong on its own protocol. pm:dispatched means in flight — an agent is working on it right now. Four cards claiming that with no agent behind them makes the queue read 23 when it is really 25, hides two decisions that a maintainer has been owed since 2026-08-31, and makes every future seat's liveness patrol start by re-deriving what these four actually are. The record that items remain lives in the comments, which are permanent; the label is a state, and it was lying.

⭐ And the count itself is the evidence: the brief says pm:dispatched 3 and names three cards. There are four. #1405 was ACCEPTed at 06:24Z — the ACCEPT comment ends "Q1 stays on the human floor" — and then never transitioned. A card can only go missing from its own author's tally when the label has stopped meaning anything.

Repairs land in this round's next writes, each with its own comment stating what does and does not remain.

Two stale premises found before any dispatch — both would have cost a run

1. ⛔ Upgrade @objectstack/spec to the next published release carrying the #12497 retirement (post-release hygiene) #1376 ("upgrade @objectstack/spec to the next published release") may already be done. The brief records "@objectstack/spec latest published is 17.2.0; this repo pins 17.1.0 — Upgrade @objectstack/spec to the next published release carrying the #12497 retirement (post-release hygiene) #1376's work." On 2026-09-01, after that brief was written, card 把 @objectstack/* 从 17.1.0 升到 17.2.0（整批同步） #1441 landed PR chore(deps): upgrade the ObjectStack platform to 17.2.0 #1442, "chore(deps): upgrade the ObjectStack platform to 17.2.0" (merged_at 03:03:17Z), through the maintainer's direct-dispatch channel. ⇒ The pin this card exists to move has very likely already moved, by a channel this seat does not watch. Re-measured against package.json before it is dispatched or closed.
2. ⚠️ The pm:on-hold / pm:blocked unlock predicates in this lane are all "published, not merged", and a platform bump landed since the last patrol. Every blocked card whose upstream is a released @objectstack/* face is now measured against 17.2.0, not 17.1.0.

⭐ The general shape, and it is the R15 lesson pointed the other way: the stale-premise check applies to what happened while the seat was empty. Two days of vacancy is two days of a second actor landing work into the same tree, and the brief cannot know about any of it.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[hotlong]

Round 19 opened — session_018Z7RPTnPnXsb8RUBr4yDjE, 2026-09-03. Same seat, continuing from the body's R18 close; no handover. Dispatched on reaching in-flight-zero per the wave rule, under the standing instruction 「你应该自主派发，并发保持3」 — ⛔ not waiting on a human gate.

Batch of 3, premises re-verified on origin/main @ c73b496b (main moved twice during R18, so every reading was re-taken):

card	surface	tier
#1102	src/sharing/demo-staffing.ts + test/demo-staffing.test.ts	opus · M — ruled (option C)
#1450	test/dashboard-date-range-window.test.ts (+ vitest.config.ts only if licensed)	opus · M — measurement-first
#1416	src/objects/{case,lead}.hook.ts	opus · M

Disjoint by file. ⛔ No hot-file serialisation owed: none of the three touches AGENTS.md, package.json, check-source-token-ratchet.mjs, or test/helpers/flow-harness.ts.

⚠️ fable remains exhausted (measured 429 on 2026-09-02), so opus is the ceiling this round as well as the choice. Recorded so the tier is auditable rather than silent.

⭐ #1102's fence was released by R18's outcome, and that is why it is here now

R18 deliberately held this card out because it might have needed test/parent-derived-reach.test.ts, which #549 owned that round. #549 stopped with an empty diff, so that file was never touched and nothing holds it. ⇒ The serial constraint discharged itself, and the card that was second in line is now first. Recorded because a released fence that nobody notices is a card that sits for another week.

⛔ A stale premise caught in an inherited brief — this one changes the question, not just a detail

#1416's R17 dispatch comment is otherwise excellent and stands, but it says "Establish it on the installed 17.1.0". That is no longer the pin: PR #1442 moved every @objectstack/* to 17.2.0 on 2026-09-01, after that brief was written.

⇒ The card's binary question became a three-way one, and the new branch is the likeliest: the fix may have landed between 17.1.0 and 17.2.0, which would make the note true when measured and false now, on the version actually installed.

⚠️ And one claim in the tree is already false regardless of what the probe returns: src/objects/lead.hook.ts still reads "Re-measured on 17.1.0 — the version this repo pins." It pins 17.2.0. That is a second instance of the exact failure mode #1416 exists to fix, sitting in one of the two files the card is about.

⭐ The general shape, and it is the R18 lesson pointed at inherited work: a brief written before a platform bump is a stale-premise carrier, however good it is. The R17 brief did everything right and was overtaken by a channel neither it nor this seat watches.

Premise re-verifications carried into the orders

• Both case-routing pools are unstaffed in the demo org, so neither intake round-robin nor escalation hand-off does anything there #1102 — test/demo-staffing.test.ts still lists service_manager and service_agent in DELIBERATELY_UNSTAFFED; demo-staffing.ts still staffs three. Ruling live. ⚠️ Its claimed payoff of four dark mechanisms is asserted by the ruling and not verified by me — the order asks the dev to check, because the cost/benefit was argued on four.
• dashboard-date-range-window suite fails 5/13 off-by-one when the local clock is a day ahead of UTC — green only because CI runs UTC #1450 — the suite exists and neither vitest.config.ts nor package.json pins TZ, so the ambient-clock dependence is intact. ⛔ The order forbids opening with a TZ pin: the measurement of where the window is computed decides whether a pin is honest or a cover-up.
• Re-measure the "delete ctx.input.x is a silent no-op" claim in case.hook.ts / lead.hook.ts — the upstream defect it cites (objectstack#12277) is CLOSED, so the note may now be stale on a future platform bump #1416 — both copies live and still spelled differently (ctx.input.<field> vs input.x), exactly as the R17 brief warns.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[hotlong]

Round 20 opened — session_018Z7RPTnPnXsb8RUBr4yDjE, 2026-09-03. Same seat, continuing from R19; no handover. Dispatched on in-flight-zero per the wave rule, standing instruction 「你应该自主派发，并发保持3」.

R19 closed: 3 of 3 landed. #1416 → PR #1459 · #1450 → PR #1461 (Part of; card closed, its docs half folded into #1395) · #1102 → PR #1463. main c73b496b → 08baa817.

Batch of 3, premises re-verified per file on 08baa817:

card	surface	tier
#1231	.stackblitzrc · package-lock.json · the gate script + its two references	opus · M — ruled
#1460	16 comment sites across src/ + test/	opus · M — ruled by this seat
#1444	a new posture guard + 4 sharing suites	opus · M — ruled by this seat

Disjoint by file, checked entry by entry rather than by directory. ⛔ test/helpers/flow-harness.ts (#1458, queued) is fenced off all three; package.json (#1376's chain) is fenced off #1231.

⭐ Premise checks that changed a dispatch order

• Every npm-ecosystem dependabot PR is structurally unmergeable: it updates pnpm-lock.yaml but not package-lock.json, and the StackBlitz lock check is CI's first step #1231 — check-stackblitz-lock is referenced from two places, .github/workflows/ci.yml and scripts/lib/source-hygiene-surface.mjs. The card and the ruling name only the CI step. ⇒ Retiring the script would leave a dangling reference. Written into the order as A2.
• The 17.2.0 upgrade left 16 comments asserting that 17.1.0 is "the version this repo pins" — every one is now false, in the place a maintainer reads before acting #1460 — the reproduce grep still returns exactly 16, unchanged since filing. ⚠️ But PR docs(objects): version-qualify the delete-is-a-no-op note, re-measured on 17.2.0 #1459 landed after the card was written and corrected two of the sites it tabulates, so the order requires re-deriving the list from the grep, never from the card's table, and reporting if the live count differs.
• Four more suites mount SharingServicePlugin without declaring a tenancy posture — they pass only because none of them asserts on a seeded sharing rule #1444 — all four suites confirmed importing SharingServicePlugin with no tenancyProbe, measured per file.

The R19 lesson carried into all three orders

Every R19 dispatch had its framing corrected by the dev: a three-way question with no room for the true answer (#1416), a permitted fix the measurement made unnecessary (#1450), and a ruling's factual claim that did not survive checking (#1102). ⇒ All three R20 orders name what I have not verified, separately from what I have, and say plainly that falsifying me is a good outcome.

⭐ And one specific guard carried from #1102's near-miss: #1444's order requires the guard to be demonstrated red. A grep-shaped rule that matches nothing passes forever, and this lane has just paid for a test that compared undefined to undefined and stayed green while the mechanism was dark.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[hotlong]

开轮标记 — R21

Session session_018Z7RPTnPnXsb8RUBr4yDjE · fire 2026-09-03 · seat repo:hotcrm · 互斥四读清,无并行同席会话。

基线: main @ f01e6f6f (chore(ci): retire the StackBlitz demo and the npm lockfile it existed for (#1469)). 在飞归零后按波次规则立即开轮,⛔ 未等人闸。

在飞 3/3 — 三张卡文件面互不相交:

#	prio/type	文件面	branch
1468	prio:p1 Bug	content/docs/reference/security-and-compliance.mdx	claude/issue-1468-security-page-freshness-warrant
1467	Bug	src/views/* ×4, src/dashboards/sales.dashboard.ts, test/forecast-current-quarter-view.test.ts, test/view-references.test.ts	claude/issue-1467-pin-assertion-sweep
1470	Task	test/source-hygiene-scan-surface.test.ts	claude/issue-1470-lockfile-exclusion-prose

热文件串行队 — 本轮新增围栏:

• ⛔ test/helpers/hook-harness.ts reserved to The flow harness store returns a row shape no driver returns: keys nobody wrote are absent, not null #1458 (未派发)。Nine comments assert 17.0.0-rc.2 is "the pinned" version — same defect as #1460, two pins further out of date, and missed by that card's grep #1467 的 version-agnostic grep 命中该文件两次,但两处均已正确(17.2.0),故 Nine comments assert 17.0.0-rc.2 is "the pinned" version — same defect as #1460, two pins further out of date, and missed by that card's grep #1467 无需进入,派发令已明令禁止。The flow harness store returns a row shape no driver returns: keys nobody wrote are absent, not null #1458 的爆炸半径是全部 flow test,必须独占派发。
• ⛔ The zone-fragility sweep that cleared the rest of test/ was one point, not a matrix — and flow-filter-today-token's ymd() still mixes two calendars #1462 与 The flow harness store returns a row shape no driver returns: keys nobody wrote are absent, not null #1458 直接相撞(共用 test/helpers/hook-harness.ts 与五个 flow test 夹具),两者 ⛔ 永不同批。

后端降级: fable 配额耗尽(HTTP 429),三张卡全部按维护者 2026-08-13 常设指令降至 opus(地板,⛔ 不再下调)。首次派发的三个子代理在动工前即死于配额,零推送零分支,不计返工。

---

派发前前提重验 — 三张卡有三处与卡面不符,均已写进派发令

#1468 — 目标文件有 四处 17.1.0,不是一处。第 126/182/186 行是溯源(某平台能力何时到货),恒真,⛔ 不得改写;只有第 12 行是鲜度声明。另:package.json 只声明 12 个 @objectstack/*,卡面的「51」是安装树读数,卡自带的复现命令读 package.json,根本查不到这个数。

#1467 — 按定级令要求以 version-agnostic grep 在 f01e6f6f 上重导人口:13 命中 / 10 文件,其中 4 处已经正确(断言 17.2.0)。⇒ 假阳性人口恰为 9 命中 / 7 文件,与卡面表格逐行吻合 —— 加宽后的 grep 没有找到任何新的假声明,这本身是结论,已要求 dev 写进 PR。那 4 处正确站点是措辞样板兼对照组,⛔ 不得触碰。test/cascade-guard-messages.test.ts:44 经查其「pinned by the first test below」pin 的是行为不是版本,属溯源,依 CHANGELOG.md rc.2→rc.3 那条常设裁决留存。

#1470 — 门禁侧已由 PR #1469 一并修好(scripts/lib/source-hygiene-surface.mjs:162-175 现已如实记述两个 lockfile 中的第二个连同其专用门禁一并退役),⇒ 只有测试套件掉队,卡的面比卡面窄。⚠️ 该用例红不了:它自己把两个文件名写进沙箱再断言门禁 exit 0,从不读真实树 —— 这个缺陷在构造上对 CI 不可见。已把 PM 的「保留条目=保留守卫」假设写成一次可证伪探针交给 dev 实测。

---

Generated by Claude Code