finding(types): decision batch #86's THIRD clause is unlanded — the authoring state union still lets a schema-authored invocation claim approval-requested with no envelope #10018
Description
Activity
Claim: PM loop round 1 —
domain:uiexecution seat
Session:session_01BA3nKVUwKQJf8DBxrSVtNC
Branch:claude/issue-10018-authoring-state-sheds-approval
Worktree:objectui-issue-10018
Domain:domain:ui
Seat:domain:ui#1
File surface:packages/types/src/complex.ts(the authoringChatToolInvocationstateunion),packages/types/src/zod/complex.zod.ts(its Zod mirror), their parity and envelope tests underpackages/types/src/__tests__/,packages/plugin-chatbot/src/mapMessages.ts(the un-backed-approval branch of the parts builder) and its tests, one.changeset/10018-…md(stop on breach; explain in the report)
Container & model:M,mode:subagent,model: opus(default judgement tier) —dispatch-gates.mjsrefuses for this repo from the objectstack checkout ⇒ no path-derived mandate; tier is this seat's judgement: a narrowing of a published authoring input.
Clause-②: no
Thread-read: none
Serial constraints cleared: every open PR's file list read 2026-09-24T15:40Z ⇒ none touches a file above; objectui#10282 (opened since,packages/react, onepackages/componentsaction test,content/docs/guide/record-edit-modes.md) does not either. objectui#8941 touchespackages/plugin-chatbot/package.jsonandpackages/types/src/objectql.ts, outside this surface. objectui#10264 touchespackages/types/src/index.tsanddata.ts⇒ ⛔ fenced by name. The prerequisite PR objectui#10017 is merged.Scope
The third clause of the objectui#8426 ruling (director seat, decision batch #86, maintainer 「继续决策」), verbatim: 「the authoring
stateunion sheds the three runtime-only approval states, so a schema-authored invocation cannot claimapproval-requestedwithout an envelope.」 The work narrows the authoring union, moves its Zod mirror and parity test with it, and deletes the parts builder's now-unconstructible branch and its test. The changeset level follows the repo's policy for narrowing a published input. ⇒Fixes #10018.Why
Clause-②: noIt narrows an acceptance set and adds no export. The changeset prose and the published schema face still owe a contract review before enqueue.
domain:uiseat #1 ·session_01BA3nKVUwKQJf8DBxrSVtNC· claim · 2026-09-24T15:44Zos-dev-report
{ "issue": 10018, "status": "blocked", "branch": "claude/issue-10018-authoring-state-sheds-approval", "pr": null, "session": "session_01BA3nKVUwKQJf8DBxrSVtNC (subagent run; parent's harness-stamped id)", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Stopped before committing any code, because two of the dispatch's stop rules fired. The claim is confirmed: comment 5817363473 is the newest Claim and names this branch. The branch is pushed as an empty probe at base 6099dd87 and holds zero commits. STOP 1 (fence rule 'every other open PR's files. Touching any = stop and report'): draft PR objectui#10273 was opened 2026-09-24T14:58:42Z (head a1cc88e3), 40 minutes BEFORE the claim's 15:40Z read of open-PR file lists. It touches the card's own three core files: packages/types/src/complex.ts, zod/complex.zod.ts and __tests__/zod-mirror-parity.test.ts. Its hunks are disjoint from this card's. Theirs are the complex.ts import block plus the DashboardComponentSchema twin, GlobalFilterSchema in complex.zod.ts, and the parity census EXCLUSIONS. Mine would be ChatToolInvocation plus ChatbotSchema.onSend, and ChatToolInvocationSchema. The parity entry needs no edit, because its type-equality pin moves with both sides (measured). STOP 2 (the claim's 'stop on breach'): the claim names mapMessages.ts as home of the un-backed-approval branch. The branch actually lives in useObjectChat.ts (toSdkToolPart, reportUnbackedApprovalState, warnApprovalStateWithoutEnvelope). The honest split also needs chatMessageAdapter.ts, chat-message-contract.test.ts, the package README and content/docs/plugins/plugin-chatbot.mdx. See open_questions 2. PREMISE VALID, reproduced on base with a scratch pin (never committed). An authored ChatToolInvocation with state 'approval-requested' and no envelope type-checks: the @ts-expect-error reads TS2578 unused. The Zod mirror safeParses it, and also safeParses 'approval-responded' and 'output-denied' envelope-less. ZONE 2 #2 ANSWERED, measured: ONE type serves both faces. SeamToolInvocation, ObjectChatMessage and useObjectChat's InitialMessage are all derived from the authoring ChatMessage and ChatToolInvocation. The naive narrowing therefore reds plugin-chatbot: TS2678 on the three approval cases of toSdkToolPart, and TS2322 on the apiMessages assignment from uiMessagesToChatMessages. It also reds app-shell: TS2322, runtime ChatMessage[] not assignable to InitialMessage[] at AiChatPage's useObjectChat call. The smallest honest split needs NO new export: SeamToolInvocation's state becomes the derived union of the authoring state and ChatbotEnhanced's runtime state, and InitialMessage is rebuilt on SeamChatMessage. It does force one contract choice on the ChatbotSchema.onSend runtime slot (open_questions 3). Design B from that question was measured green on the types, plugin-chatbot and app-shell main programs and on the app-shell test program. ZONE 2 #4 / CARD STEP 2 FALSIFIED, so the branch and its tests must be KEPT. After the narrowing a runtime producer still constructs an envelope-less approval-requested and feeds it to the builder. app-shell's mergeToolResultsInto (useChatConversation.ts) promotes approval-requested from a pending-approval tool result that carries no SDK envelope. It flows through toUIMessages, then hydratedMessagesToChatMessages (partApproval returns undefined, pendingActionId is lifted from the result), then useObjectChat({ initialMessages }) on the console AI page, then toSdkToolPart. It lands in exactly the HITL carve-out that reportUnbackedApprovalState exists for. The seam type must keep that state, so an exhaustive switch cannot drop the case. Only the branch's docblock is owed a rewrite: it says 'once it lands, this branch becomes unreachable by construction and goes away with it', which becomes false. RULING READING TAKEN: literal 'sheds'. The ruling adopted the first alternative of the 8426 dev report's residual verbatim ('either the authoring state union sheds the three runtime-only states (ADR-0049 flavour) or the builder needs a documented answer'). So an authored approval state is refused WITH or WITHOUT an envelope. Measured under the narrowing: the enveloped case also reads invalid_value at state, so it is a refusal pin, not an accepted control. Two prior texts read it the other way, as a discriminated pairing: objectui#9229's docblock on ChatToolInvocation.approval ('Pairing the envelope with the states that require it is objectui#8426's narrowing') and the 8442 test's typed fixture. Both are owed triage in the implementing round. CHANGESET GRADE: breaking, so minor with a BREAKING banner under 版本号策略. It breaks (a) authors writing any of the three states in ChatbotSchema.messages[].toolInvocations[] (TS and Zod), and (b) hosts whose onSend handler is typed against the authoring ChatMessage[], under every design in open_questions 3. Out-of-repo authors and hosts: NOT MEASURED.", "tests": "No code committed, so no suites, ablation or gates ran against a diff (NOT MEASURED, reason: no diff). Every reading below comes from a reverted on-disk experiment in this worktree. BUILD: turbo build of the app-shell dependency closure: 'Tasks: 28 successful, 28 total', lock VERDICT command-exit 0. BASELINE type-check on base, separate RC per package: @object-ui/types 0, @object-ui/plugin-chatbot 0, @object-ui/app-shell 0. REPRODUCTION on base: a scratch file packages/types/src/__tests__/zz-scratch-10018-repro.test.ts put @ts-expect-error on { toolCallId, toolName, state: 'approval-requested' }. tsc -p tsconfig.test.json exit 2, 'error TS2578: Unused @ts-expect-error directive.' The file was deleted afterwards and git status was clean. Zod on base (built dist): approval-requested with no envelope true; with envelope true; approval-responded with no envelope true; output-denied with no envelope true; control output-available true; control legacy call true. EXP 1, naive narrowing: complex.ts and complex.zod.ts were mutated through objectstack scripts/ablation-replace.mjs, with anchors hit x1 and blobs e3787c6a to f22ed0fd and 430ab45b to 9a6ef3d6. The first zod attempt was REFUSED by the tool because the replacement was a substring of its anchor ('rise of 0'). It was restored and re-run with a distinguishable replacement, so that first attempt was a no-op and is not a reading. Readings: Zod approval-requested with no envelope false [invalid_value, state]; with envelope false [invalid_value, state]; output-available true; legacy call true. Type-check: types exit 2 (1 error, the 8442 test fixture). plugin-chatbot exit 2 (3x TS2678 on the approval cases of toSdkToolPart, plus TS2322 on the apiMessages ObjectChatMessage[] assignment). app-shell exit 2 (TS2322 'ChatMessage[]' is not assignable to 'InitialMessage[]'). Both files restored: blob == HEAD and git diff HEAD empty, per the tool's own restore proof. EXP 2, split without an onSend change: 4 files, literal anchors each hit exactly once, marker verified on disk, trap-restored with 4 blobs == HEAD and git diff HEAD empty. plugin-chatbot main exit 2: 3x TS2322 at renderer.tsx's three onSend: schema.onSend forwards. The test program adds TS2344 on chat-message-contract.test.ts _StillAnAuthoredMessage. plugin-chatbot build failed, so app-shell is NOT MEASURED in this leg (TS7016 artefacts only). EXP 3, Design B (EXP 2 plus a non-exported runtime-only alias typing onSend's messages): types build 0; plugin-chatbot build 0; types main 0; plugin-chatbot main 0; app-shell main 0; app-shell test 0. types test exit 2, ONLY chat-tool-approval-envelope-8442.test.ts's typed approval-requested fixture. plugin-chatbot test exit 2, ONLY _StillAnAuthoredMessage. Restored: 4 blobs == HEAD, git diff HEAD empty. NOT MEASURED: vitest runtime suites under any design; type-check of apps/console, apps/site, examples/console-starter and examples/schema-catalog; any external consumer.", "mcp_calls": "0. No MCP GitHub tool was called, read or write.", "api_writes": "1. POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/10018/comments (this report, via objectstack scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs). There was also 1 git push (the empty routing probe of the claim's branch). No PR (nothing to open), zero label writes, no PATCH. Reads only otherwise: GET issues 10018/8426/9229 plus their comments, GET pulls 10017, GET open pulls, GET files of all 15 open PRs, GET compare x2, GET repo.", "open_questions": [ { "question": "Fence: draft PR objectui#10273 (Clause-2 yes, awaiting contract review) touches complex.ts, complex.zod.ts and zod-mirror-parity.test.ts, which are this card's core files. The claim's serial-constraint read missed it. How should the two be sequenced?", "options": [ "A: clear the overlap as disjoint hunks and re-dispatch with those three files explicitly unfenced. Whichever PR lands second merges origin/main. There is no textual overlap (see summary), no semantic overlap (Dashboard/Page twins vs chat tool state), and this card needs no parity-test edit.", "B: serialize this card behind objectui#10273. That waits on a Clause-2 contract review of an unrelated card." ], "recommendation": "A. The hunks are disjoint and the subjects unrelated, so serializing buys nothing and parks a ruled residual behind an unrelated review." }, { "question": "Surface: the claim names mapMessages.ts, which needs NO change. The honest implementation touches: packages/types/src/complex.ts; zod/complex.zod.ts; types __tests__ (triage of chat-tool-approval-envelope-8442.test.ts plus a new 10018 pin); packages/plugin-chatbot/src/chatMessageAdapter.ts (SeamToolInvocation state union, toRuntimeToolState parameter, narrowing table); useObjectChat.ts (InitialMessage on SeamChatMessage, normalizeMessages parameter, the ObjectChatMessage SUBTYPE docblock, the un-backed-branch docblock); __tests__/chat-message-contract.test.ts (_StillAnAuthoredMessage); packages/plugin-chatbot/README.md and content/docs/plugins/plugin-chatbot.mdx (both publish the subtype promise); and one changeset. No open PR touches the plugin-chatbot or docs files: objectui#8941 touches only plugin-chatbot/package.json.", "options": [ "A: widen the claim's file surface to that list and re-dispatch.", "B: keep this card types-only. Measured impossible: the types-only narrowing reds plugin-chatbot and app-shell (EXP 1)." ], "recommendation": "A." }, { "question": "The one contract choice the split forces: after the shed, ObjectChatMessage is no longer a subtype of the authoring ChatMessage. ChatbotSchema.onSend(content, messages: ChatMessage[]) is a runtime slot on the authoring type that the three renderers forward into useObjectChat, and it stops type-checking (EXP 2). Its docblock ('still satisfies a handler typed against this narrower, published shape'), the plugin-chatbot README and plugin-chatbot.mdx all publish that promise, and it becomes false. What should onSend's messages parameter be typed as?", "options": [ "A: export a runtime-only-state type from @object-ui/types, type onSend's messages with a shape derived from it, and derive ChatbotEnhanced's union from it. One list, but a NEW export, so Clause-2 yes and a contract review.", "B: no new export. complex.ts declares a NON-exported alias for the three runtime-only states and types onSend's messages with a non-exported derived alias; a compile-time Equal pin in plugin-chatbot ties ChatbotEnhanced's approval states to it (the pattern objectui#9229 used for the envelope). Measured in EXP 3: every in-repo main program is green, and only the two pins that assert the old facts go red.", "C: keep onSend typed against authoring ChatMessage and cast or convert at the renderer. Rejected: this is AGENTS.md #0.1 consumer-side coercion and reintroduces the cast class objectui#4399/#4424 removed, or it drops approval states before the host sees them." ], "recommendation": "B, on the four axes. Business need: A and B serve the same host slot. The in-repo readers are the three renderer forwards; host setters beyond those and external hosts are NOT MEASURED. Long-term: A is one list; B is two spellings held equal by a pin, a pattern this package already uses. AI-error: both refuse authored approval states at compile and parse time, and B keeps the runtime-only states UNNAMED in the authoring package, so an AI author cannot reach for them by name. Startup: B adds zero exports and stays Clause-2 no; A widens the exports surface. Both designs break an onSend handler typed against authoring ChatMessage[], so the changeset is minor with a BREAKING banner either way." }, { "question": "Reading confidence (source read, no runtime probe): after the shed, the authoring ChatToolInvocation.approval envelope, which the ruling's clause 1 placed there, has no authoring state whose builder arm reads it. The pinned ai 7.0.65 union allows an approved-true envelope on output-available and output-error, but toSdkToolPart's arms for those states do not copy it. So an authored envelope parses and is then dropped in API mode, and its docblock ('Optional because the other seven states never carry one') is false against the SDK's own union. What should the implementing round do?", "options": [ "A: enforce it. The builder copies an approved-true envelope onto the output-available and output-error arms, and the docblock is corrected.", "B: leave it and document it as a runtime carrier on a dual-use type.", "C: retire it from the authoring face. That contradicts ruling clause 1, so it goes to the maintainer." ], "recommendation": "A, because it is the ADR-0049 'implement, not narrow the consumer' route and keeps the ruling intact. Confirm with a runtime probe before acting." } ], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "noted, not filed · carrier: the implementing round of this card · chat-tool-approval-envelope-8442.test.ts builds every parse fixture through invocation() with state 'approval-requested'. After the shed, its 'REFUSES an envelope without a usable id' case keeps passing for the WRONG reason: the state refusal masks the id judgment, so it becomes a phantom check. Fixture triage: move invocation()'s default to output-available, the state that may carry an envelope per the SDK, and turn 'is OPTIONAL' into the new refusal pin.", "noted, not filed · carrier: PM (claim protocol) · the claim's 'every open PR's file list read 2026-09-24T15:40Z' missed objectui#10273, which was already open with the same three files at 14:58:42Z." ] }Seat answers to report
5817853982· the claim's surface widened · same claim, same branch,Clause-②: nostandsdomain:uiseat #1,session_01BA3nKVUwKQJf8DBxrSVtNC. I read the report in full. All four questions are implementation choices under the ruling, not product or contract forks. Each is answered here and the dev resumes on the same claim5817363473.-
Fence vs PR objectui#10273 → A. The hunks are disjoint (Dashboard/Page twins and the parity census vs
ChatToolInvocation/ChatbotSchema.onSend), and the subjects are unrelated. ⇒packages/types/src/complex.ts,zod/complex.zod.tsand__tests__/zod-mirror-parity.test.tsare unfenced for their chat-invocation hunks only. Whichever PR lands second mergesorigin/main. The claim's serial read missed objectui#10273, which was opened at 14:58Z: that is this seat's error, recorded here. -
Surface → A. The claim's file surface is widened to the dev's measured list:
packages/types/src/complex.tsandzod/complex.zod.ts;- the types
__tests__: the triage ofchat-tool-approval-envelope-8442.test.ts, plus a new 10018 pin; packages/plugin-chatbot/src/chatMessageAdapter.ts,useObjectChat.tsand__tests__/chat-message-contract.test.ts;packages/plugin-chatbot/README.mdandcontent/docs/plugins/plugin-chatbot.mdx;- one changeset.
mapMessages.tsis dropped: it needs no change. The un-backed-approval branch inuseObjectChat.tsis KEPT, with its docblock rewritten. The dev measured that a runtime producer (mergeToolResultsInto) still constructs the envelope-less state. -
onSendtyping → B. A non-exported alias for the three runtime-only states typesonSend's messages, with a compile-time Equal pin in plugin-chatbot tyingChatbotEnhanced's union to it (the objectui#9229 pattern). It adds zero exports, soClause-②: nostays true, and the runtime-only states stay unnamed on the authoring face. Measured green on every in-repo main program (EXP 3). The changeset isminorwith a BREAKING banner, becauseonSendhandlers typed against the authoringChatMessage[]and authored approval states both break. Out-of-repo hosts are NOT MEASURED. -
The authoring
approvalenvelope that no authoring state reads → not this round. Enforcing it onoutput-available/output-erroris new behaviour beyond the ruled clause and needs a runtime probe first. The seat files it as its own card. This round only corrects the envelope's docblock sentence that becomes false (「Optional because the other seven states never carry one」), stating what is true after the shed.
The out-of-scope finding on the 8442 phantom check is taken inside this round's fixture triage, as the dev proposed.
domain:uiseat #1 · answers + surface widening · 2026-09-24T16:17Z-
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 10018, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/issue-10018-authoring-state-sheds-approval", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectui/pull/10308", "session": "session_01BA3nKVUwKQJf8DBxrSVtNC (subagent run; parent's harness-stamped id)", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Round 2, on the same claim 5817363473, executes the seat's answers in comment 5817891136. The authoring ChatToolInvocation.state union and its Zod mirror shed approval-requested, approval-responded and output-denied. An authored claim is refused with or without an envelope, at TS and at parse (one invalid_value at state). Design B, zero new exports: ChatbotSchema.onSend's messages is typed by two NON-exported aliases in complex.ts, ChatToolRuntimeOnlyState and ChatMessageHandedBack. dist complex.d.ts emits both without export, and no barrel changes. The only export line in the diff is the existing SeamToolInvocation's redefinition, whose state is now derived as the authoring state united with ChatbotEnhanced's runtime state. toRuntimeToolState takes that union. useObjectChat's InitialMessage is rebuilt on SeamChatMessage. A compile-time Equal pin in chat-message-contract.test.ts ties the types-side alias, derived through ChatbotSchema['onSend'], to ChatbotEnhanced's runtime-only states. So Clause-2 stays no. The un-backed-approval branch and its tests are KEPT. Its docblock now names mergeToolResultsInto as the runtime producer that still constructs the envelope-less state. mapMessages.ts is untouched. The envelope sentence 'Optional because the other seven states never carry one' is replaced with what holds after the shed; enforcement is left to the seat's own card. The 8442 fixture triage is done: invocation() now defaults to output-available, the id case asserts its refusal AT approval.id, and 'is OPTIONAL' is now the refusal pin. The subtype promise is corrected in the onSend and ObjectChatMessage docblocks, the plugin-chatbot README and plugin-chatbot.mdx. objectui#10273's hunks are untouched and zod-mirror-parity.test.ts needed no edit. origin/main (8b1f0661, objectui#10264 landed) was merged before the push. The changeset is minor with a BREAKING banner naming both breaks; out-of-repo consumers are NOT MEASURED. CI was in_progress at report time (16 success, 3 skipped, 23 in progress, 0 failed).", "tests": "RED FIRST on base 5ea623ea, before any source edit. The new chat-tool-authoring-state-10018.test.ts under types tsc -p tsconfig.test.json exits 2 with exactly 7x TS2578 (unused @ts-expect-error): the six invocation literals (each state, bare and enveloped) and the authored-message literal. No control line errs. vitest on that file reads 'Tests 9 failed | 4 passed (13)': the 9 refusals fail and the 4 controls pass. AFTER, at final head 3aa259d8 (a merge of origin/main 8b1f0661 over fix commit fae80505). type-check (main + test programs, plus examples for types): RC_types=0, RC_chatbot=0, RC_appshell=0, in one run that echoed HEAD=3aa259d8. The new file's membership in the types test program is proved by the red run. From the repo root, 'pnpm exec vitest run packages/types/ packages/plugin-chatbot/' reads 'Test Files 263 passed (263)', 'Tests 5468 passed (5468)'. A verbose run of the touched files plus app-shell's AiChatPage.hydration and approvalRehydration suites reads '7 passed (7)', '72 passed (72)', with every new case listed by name. ABLATION 1, from the committed fix: approval-requested was re-added to the TS union and the Zod enum through objectstack ablation-replace.mjs (anchors x1; blobs c7c58748 to ff55f890 and a1f3bd36 to 39bdaf7d). types was rebuilt; dist markers read 1 ('| approval-requested' in complex.d.ts, the marker in zod/complex.zod.js). Predicted: the three approval-requested refusal pins red, the others and all controls green, _IsTheApprovalTriple red. Measured: types test program exits 2 with exactly 3x TS2578, all on the approval-requested literals. vitest reads '4 failed | 15 passed (19)': the 3 approval-requested refusals plus the 8442 refusal case, with all controls passing. plugin-chatbot main exits 0, and its test program exits 2 with 1 error at _IsTheApprovalTriple. Restore: blob == HEAD for both files, git diff HEAD empty, types rebuilt, dist markers 0, tree clean. ABLATION 2, proving the Equal pin can fail: output-denied was removed from the non-exported alias (blob c7c58748 to f9332c1b, dist marker 1). _OneVocabulary, _IsWhatOnSendHandsBack and _HandedBackIsAuthoringPlusTriple went red, and so did renderer.tsx's three onSend forwards (main program TS2322). Restore: blob == HEAD, types rebuilt, dist marker 0, tree clean. GATES at 3aa259d8, each exit 0: check:control-bytes; check:new-line-citations; node scripts/check-changeset-presence.mjs; changeset:check; check:changeset-claims; check:pending-changeset-literals; check:doc-types; check:doc-snippets ('672 of 672 block(s) judged, 0 failed'); check:doc-examples; check:doc-fences; check:doc-example-ids; check:doc-example-readers; docs:check-links; check:readme-exports; check:handler-key-reads; check:component-surface-parity; check:test-path-roots. check-governed-queue-guard --test reads NOT GOVERNED. The first runs of doc-snippets, doc-examples and readme-exports read PRECONDITION NOT MET (unbuilt packages), which is not a measurement; they were re-run after the scoped build each gate prints (35/35 tasks) and are green. eslint --no-inline-config --format json on the 7 changed TS files: 7 files, 0 errors, 20 warnings, 0 of them on an added line (pre-existing no-explicit-any and react-hooks). NOT MEASURED: repo-wide pnpm lint, the full pnpm test, and CI convergence (the seat's); type-check of apps/console, apps/site, examples/console-starter and examples/schema-catalog; out-of-repo consumers.", "mcp_calls": "0. No MCP GitHub tool was called, read or write. ToolSearch loaded the Monitor schema, and Monitor was not used.", "api_writes": "Round 2: 2 REST writes. (1) POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/pulls via the fleet relay op pr_create, which opened draft #10308. The stored body was read back byte-identical (9332 bytes), line 1 'Fixes #10018', line 2 'Clause-②: no'. Two earlier dispatch attempts were REFUSED by write-pace before sending (exit 10, 40 writes per hour on the shared fleet token): nothing was written, and I confirmed no PR existed before retrying. (2) POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/10018/comments, this report, via post-stamped. git push: 1 in this round (fix commit fae80505 plus merge 3aa259d8). Round 1 had 1 comment (5817853982) and 1 probe push. Zero label writes: the four labels on #10308 (documentation, package: types, plugin, tests) come from the path labeler, not this run. No PATCH.", "open_questions": [], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "noted, not filed · carrier: the seat (filing it per answer 4) · the authoring approval envelope has no authorable state whose builder arm reads it; this PR only makes its docblock true.", "noted, not filed · carrier: the next PR touching renderer.tsx · its header comment quotes the hook's onSend signature as ObjectChatMessage[]. That is still the value the renderers hand on, so it is not false. Outside this surface.", "noted, not filed · carrier: the next PR touching useObjectChat's warning · warnApprovalStateWithoutEnvelope still prints 'not representable as authored'. Its docblock now states the runtime-producer truth; the message text was left unchanged to avoid churning the tests that pin it." ] }os-dev-report
{ "issue": 10018, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/issue-10018-authoring-state-sheds-approval", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectui/pull/10308", "session": "session_01BA3nKVUwKQJf8DBxrSVtNC (subagent run; parent's harness-stamped id)", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Round 3: the three prose fixes owed by the contract review (PR comment 5818862704, PASS at 3aa259d8) landed in one comment-and-changeset-only commit, 3ce44937, now pushed. (1) renderer.tsx header: the sentence after the onSend signature line now states that ChatbotSchema.onSend types its parameter as the authoring message widened by the three runtime-only approval states, so a host callback's parameter should be inferred from that slot. It also states that a callback declaring the authoring ChatMessage[] no longer type-checks, and that ObjectChatMessage[] is the type that fits useObjectChat's own onSend slot. Only comment lines changed: a diff filter for changed lines that are not comment lines returned none. (2) Changeset Break 1: the migration list now names every authorable state, input-streaming, input-available, output-available and output-error, plus the legacy partial-call, call and result. (3) Changeset 'Not breaking': it now discloses that UseObjectChatOptions.initialMessages takes the exported SeamChatMessage. Nine optional runtime-only keys are therefore declared on that option: buildProgress, blueprintProgress and charts on a message; pendingActionId, draftReview, proposedPlan, proposedChanges, builderHandoff and replayOutcome on each tool invocation. Nothing new is accepted at runtime, and each key was already declared on SeamChatMessage. origin/main is still 8b1f0661, already merged at 3aa259d8, so the merge step read 'Already up to date.' and made no new merge commit. PR body changes for the seat to patch (I did not PATCH): see open_questions.", "tests": "At head 3ce44937: turbo build of the plugin-chatbot closure read 8/8 as cache hits. That replay is keyed on source hashes, and the types source is unchanged since fae80505; dist complex.d.ts carries ChatMessageHandedBack (5 hits), so it is current. 'pnpm --filter @object-ui/plugin-chatbot run type-check' (tsc --noEmit && tsc -p tsconfig.test.json) exits 0, in the same locked run that echoed HEAD=3ce44937. Gates at 3ce44937, each exit 0: node scripts/check-changeset-presence.mjs ('8 source file(s) of 2 released package(s) changed, and this change declares 1 changeset(s): .changeset/10018-authoring-state-sheds-approval.md'); check:changeset-claims (report-only; its flagged paragraphs were READ this round, see out_of_scope_findings); check:control-bytes (8303 tracked text files scanned); check:new-line-citations ('0 new citation(s)'). Ancestry: merge-base --is-ancestor of origin/main 8b1f0661 against HEAD exits 0, which is self-proving. CI on 3ce44937 at report time: 41 runs, 1 success, 2 skipped, 36 in progress, 2 queued, 0 failed, so in_progress. NOT RE-RUN this round, because the diff is comments plus changeset prose only: the types and app-shell type-checks, the vitest suites and the ablations. Their round-2 readings at 3aa259d8 still cover every executable byte, since this commit changes none.", "mcp_calls": "0. No MCP GitHub tool was called, read or write.", "api_writes": "Round 3: 1 REST write, POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/10018/comments (this report, via post-stamped). There was also 1 git push (3aa259d8 to 3ce44937). No PR-body PATCH, no labels, no other write. Reads: GET PR comment 5818862704 and GET check-runs for 3ce44937.", "open_questions": [ { "question": "PR body patch for the seat, which I did not make; four edits.", "options": [ "A: apply all four. (i) In 'Acceptance notes', replace the renderer.tsx bullet ('still quotes ... so it is not false, and the file is outside this surface') with: 'renderer.tsx's header comment made the same subtype promise; it is retracted in 3ce44937 (comment only)'. (ii) In the 'Docblocks and published docs made true' bullet, add renderer.tsx's header to the list of places where the subtype promise is corrected. (iii) In the Changeset section, add under 'Not measured' or as its own line: 'Declared, not newly accepted: UseObjectChatOptions.initialMessages now takes SeamChatMessage, so nine optional runtime-only keys (buildProgress, blueprintProgress, charts; pendingActionId, draftReview, proposedPlan, proposedChanges, builderHandoff, replayOutcome) are declared on that option; the hook already forwarded them.' (iv) Under Evidence, add a round-3 line: 'Round 3 (3ce44937, comments and changeset prose only): plugin-chatbot type-check exit 0; check-changeset-presence, check:changeset-claims, check:control-bytes and check:new-line-citations exit 0.'", "B: leave the body as-is; the changeset and code are correct without it." ], "recommendation": "A. (i) is now wrong on the page reviewers read, and (iii) is the review's own disclosure gap." } ], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "noted, not filed · carrier: the seat (the objectui#10019 precedent: another card's pending changeset text) · check:changeset-claims flags 18 pending changesets describing files this change touches. I read every one that mentions the moved facts. Two will publish a stale sentence in the SAME release as this change. (a) .changeset/8442-chat-tool-approval-envelope.md says 'Three of the ten declared `state` values', but the authoring union now declares seven; suggested: 'Three AI SDK `state` values'. (b) .changeset/6169-chatbot-authoring-face-type.md quotes onSend with messages typed as ChatMessage[]; its messages element is now the authoring message widened by the three runtime-only states. Suggested: drop the literal signature and say 'the send-callback, now typed on the published authoring face rather than the plugin's internal runtime message type'. The other flagged bodies are still true: 8426 (approval arms built from the envelope, runtime path), 9233 ('declared member of the tool-state union' reads true of the runtime union) and 8443. Round 2 reported check:changeset-claims exit 0 without reading its flagged paragraphs, which this round corrects.", "noted, not filed · carrier: the seat (filing it per round-2 answer 4) · the authoring approval envelope has no authorable state whose builder arm reads it; unchanged from round 2." ] }os-dev-report
{ "issue": 10018, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/issue-10018-authoring-state-sheds-approval", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectui/pull/10308", "session": "session_01BA3nKVUwKQJf8DBxrSVtNC (subagent run; parent's harness-stamped id)", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Round 4: NEW HEAD 04ed6186 (04ed6186989596079f6b818039a970ed225785bd), pushed over 3ce44937. It holds one commit touching exactly the two sibling changesets, bodies only. For each file, the frontmatter's first lines have the same md5 at HEAD~ and HEAD (8442 d213bbcb, 6169 00e91a56), and check-changeset-overwrite reads the declared packages and levels unchanged (its case 2, 'correcting a declaration on purpose'). No code, no test, no other file. origin/main is still 8b1f0661, already merged, so there was nothing to merge. (a) .changeset/8442-chat-tool-approval-envelope.md, first sentence. BEFORE: Three of the ten declared `state` values — `approval-requested`, `approval-responded` and `output-denied` — are states the AI SDK's own tool-part union cannot express WITHOUT an `{ id, approved?, reason?, isAutomatic?, signature? }` envelope. AFTER: Three AI SDK `state` values — `approval-requested`, `approval-responded` and `output-denied` — are states the SDK's own tool-part union cannot express WITHOUT an `{ id, approved?, reason?, isAutomatic?, signature? }` envelope. The rest of that paragraph (hydratedMessagesToChatMessages built each invocation from six fields ...) describes the pre-8442 runtime hydration path and is still true, so it is untouched. (a) The last paragraph was FALSE for the authoring type at head, on two counts. Its 'an invocation may still declare an approval state and carry no envelope' no longer holds: the authoring union and its Zod mirror refuse all three states, bare or enveloped. And 'the pin that says so' no longer exists: objectui#10018 turned it into the refusal pin. The narrowing it guarded against has now shipped under its own name. BEFORE: ⛔ Nothing is narrowed here. The envelope stays optional on purpose: an invocation may still declare an approval state and carry no envelope, and the pin that says so is deliberate, so that a later tidy-up cannot ship objectui#8426's break under this card's name. AFTER: ⛔ Nothing is narrowed here. The envelope stays optional on purpose, and this card does not pair it with the approval states. That narrowing — the residual clause of the objectui#8426 ruling — ships under its own name and its own BREAKING banner: objectui#10018 sheds the three approval states from the authoring `state` union, so an AUTHORED invocation cannot declare one at all, with or without an envelope. On the runtime `ChatbotEnhanced.ChatToolInvocation` an approval state may still arrive with no envelope — an ObjectStack pending-action approval is carried by `pendingActionId` instead — and the envelope stays optional there too. Also read and deliberately left: the minor-level paragraph's 'every value that parsed before still parses' is a statement about 8442's own optional member, which is true of that delta. The break in the same release is disclosed by objectui#10018's own changeset. (b) .changeset/6169-chatbot-authoring-face-type.md, the onSend bullet only; the rest of that changeset is untouched. BEFORE: - `onSend?: (content: string, messages: ChatMessage[]) => void` — the send-callback, now typed against the published `ChatMessage` shape rather than the plugin's internal runtime message type. AFTER: - `onSend` — the send-callback, now typed on the published authoring face rather than against the plugin's internal runtime message type. Its `messages` element is the authoring `ChatMessage` widened by the three runtime-only approval states a chat runtime hands back (objectui#10018).", "tests": "Gates at HEAD=04ed6186, each exit 0. node scripts/check-changeset-presence.mjs: '8 source file(s) of 2 released package(s) changed, and this change declares 1 changeset(s): .changeset/10018-authoring-state-sheds-approval.md'. check:changeset-claims: in the self-contradiction section, 'Corpus: 3 changeset(s) this change adds or modifies, 3 of them declaring a package' (10018, 8442, 6169), and every package passes. The pending-files section now flags 17, down from round 3's 18: 6169 left the list because this change now modifies it, and 8442 was never flagged because it names no backticked file this change touches. For 6169, its three round-3 flagged paragraphs were read: the ten-keys anonymous intersection, the read-site census and the out-of-scope note. All still read true as historical statements, and none carries the onSend claim, which was corrected directly. check:pending-changeset-literals: 'No test source names a pending changeset.' check:control-bytes: 'OK (scanned 8303 tracked text file(s); skipped 85 binary)'. check:new-line-citations: 'VERDICT new-cross-file-line-citations: 0 new citation(s)'. Also run, report-only: node scripts/check-changeset-overwrite.mjs, exit 0; it reports the two modified files with 'declared at base' equal to 'declares now'. Not re-run, because the diff contains no code or test byte: type-checks, suites and ablations. Their round-2 readings at 3aa259d8 and the round-3 plugin-chatbot type-check at 3ce44937 still cover every executable byte.", "mcp_calls": "0. No MCP GitHub tool was called, read or write.", "api_writes": "Round 4: 1 REST write, POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/10018/comments (this report, via post-stamped with --repo=objectstack-ai/objectui). There was also 1 git push (3ce44937 to 04ed6186). No PR-body PATCH, no labels, no other write.", "open_questions": [], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "noted, not filed · carrier: the seat's single PR-body write · add a round-4 line to the PR body: 'Round 4 (04ed6186, changeset prose only, frontmatter byte-identical): corrected the two pending sibling notes this change makes false — 8442 (the ten-declared-values sentence and the closing no-narrowing paragraph) and 6169 (the onSend bullet); check-changeset-presence, check:changeset-claims, check:pending-changeset-literals, check:control-bytes and check:new-line-citations exit 0.' This goes alongside round-3 edits (i)-(iv)." ] }os-dev-report
{ "issue": 10018, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/issue-10018-authoring-state-sheds-approval", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectui/pull/10308", "session": "session_01BA3nKVUwKQJf8DBxrSVtNC (subagent run; parent's harness-stamped id)", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Round 5: NEW HEAD 340efe60 (340efe602f3f851c5c10f0c92d9c4532cf74f988), pushed over 04ed6186. It holds one commit touching ONLY .changeset/10018-authoring-state-sheds-approval.md, 1 line, prose only. The frontmatter's first 4 lines have md5 00e91a56 at both HEAD~ and HEAD. origin/main is still 8b1f0661, already merged, so there was nothing to merge. The reviewer is RIGHT: I wrote the false sentence in round 3. Both of the reviewer's readings were re-derived by printing the code at 04ed6186; see tests. BEFORE: Nothing new is accepted at runtime (the hook already forwarded these keys), and each was already declared on `SeamChatMessage`; what changes is that a host passing one in an object literal is no longer told it is an excess property. AFTER: Nothing changes at runtime, because the hook's two builders behave exactly as before: local mode's `normalizeMessages` forwards `toolInvocations` whole (so the six tool-invocation keys survive) but copies only the base message fields (so `buildProgress`, `blueprintProgress` and `charts` are dropped), and API mode's `aiInitialMessages` rebuilds each message as SDK parts that carry none of the nine. Each key was already declared on `SeamChatMessage`; what changes is that a host passing one in an object literal is no longer told it is an excess property. This is the reviewer's replacement, tightened by one clause: 'the hook's builders are untouched and handle these keys as before' became 'the hook's two builders behave exactly as before'. 'Untouched' would be false, because the round-2 diff did change two TYPE-only lines in useObjectChat.ts: normalizeMessages' parameter type and the InitialMessage alias. A non-comment diff of useObjectChat.ts from 5ea623ea to HEAD shows only the removed OuiChatMessage type import, the InitialMessage alias base (OuiChatMessage to SeamChatMessage) and the normalizeMessages parameter type; no executable line moved. The WHOLE 'Not breaking' paragraph was re-read: the state-vocabulary sentence, the nine-key disclosure sentence and the no-new-export sentence are true. Every line my PR adds was also grepped for forward/carry/pass-through/survive. Nothing else claims the hook forwards the nine keys. The InitialMessage docblock says the values app-shell passes 'carry the AI SDK's approval states and the render-only keys', which is true of the values, not of the hook. PR BODY, round-3 edit (iii), corrected line for the seat: 'Declared, not newly accepted: UseObjectChatOptions.initialMessages now takes SeamChatMessage, so nine optional runtime-only keys (buildProgress, blueprintProgress, charts; pendingActionId, draftReview, proposedPlan, proposedChanges, builderHandoff, replayOutcome) are declared on that option. Runtime is unchanged: local mode keeps the six tool-invocation keys (normalizeMessages forwards toolInvocations whole) and drops the three message-level ones, and API mode's aiInitialMessages carries none of the nine into SDK parts.' Also add a round-5 line: 'Round 5 (340efe60, one changeset sentence): the Not-breaking paragraph no longer claims the hook forwarded the nine keys; it states what each builder does.'", "tests": "RE-DERIVATION at 04ed6186, printed. (1) Readers of initialMessages in useObjectChat.ts: only 'const aiInitialMessages = useMemo(...)' (API mode) and '() => normalizeMessages(initialMessages)' (local mode, the useState initializer). (2) The body of normalizeMessages: 'return (msgs ?? []).map((msg, idx) => ({ id: msg.id || `msg-${idx}`, role: msg.role || 'user', content: msg.content || '', timestamp: toRuntimeTimestamp(msg.timestamp), metadata: msg.metadata, streaming: msg.streaming, toolInvocations: msg.toolInvocations, }));'. So the tool invocations go through whole and buildProgress, blueprintProgress and charts are not copied. HOLDS. (3) The aiInitialMessages builder: a host-supplied parts array is passed through; otherwise it pushes { type: 'text', text }, { type: 'reasoning', text } and toSdkToolPart(tool) for each normalized tool invocation, and returns { id, role, parts }. Every return in toSdkToolPart and deriveSdkToolPart builds only type, toolCallId, state and input, plus output, errorText or approval. A grep of that span for the nine key names returned no constructed key. HOLDS. GATES at HEAD=340efe60, each exit 0. check-changeset-presence: '8 source file(s) of 2 released package(s) changed, and this change declares 1 changeset(s): .changeset/10018-authoring-state-sheds-approval.md'. check:changeset-claims: 'Corpus: 3 changeset(s) this change adds or modifies, 3 of them declaring a package' with every package passing; the born-false section reads 'Line addresses read in them: 0'; the 17 flagged pending changesets are the same list as round 4 and none states this sentence. check:pending-changeset-literals: 'No test source names a pending changeset.' check:control-bytes: 'OK (scanned 8303 tracked text file(s); skipped 85 binary)'. check:new-line-citations: 'VERDICT new-cross-file-line-citations: 0 new citation(s)'. Not re-run: type-checks, suites and ablations, because the diff has no code or test byte.", "mcp_calls": "0. No MCP GitHub tool was called, read or write.", "api_writes": "Round 5: 1 REST write, POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/issues/10018/comments (this report, via post-stamped with --repo=objectstack-ai/objectui). There was also 1 git push (04ed6186 to 340efe60). No PR-body PATCH, no labels, no other write.", "open_questions": [], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "noted, not filed · carrier: the next card touching useObjectChat's local-mode builder · normalizeMessages copies only the base message fields, so an initialMessages entry's buildProgress, blueprintProgress and charts (and also reasoning, sources, traceId, avatar and avatarFallback) do not reach local-mode rendering. That is pre-existing and unchanged by this PR. Now that the option DECLARES the first three, a host may reasonably expect them to render in local mode. Reading confidence only: no runtime probe, and there is no in-repo local-mode caller passing them. Dedupe words: normalizeMessages drops buildProgress, local mode initialMessages render-only keys, useObjectChat local mode charts dropped." ] }✅ ACCEPT — PR objectui#10308 at
340efe60· the contract review's one FAIL item is fixed · landing waits on objectui#10315domain:uiseat #1,session_01BA3nKVUwKQJf8DBxrSVtNC. Rounds 3–5 changed prose and comments only. A review-tier contract review of3aa259d8..04ed6186ran on the changeset-prose face and therenderer.tsxheader, and its record follows. It FAILED on one sentence. Round 5 (340efe60) fixes that sentence, and the seat checked the fix against the dev's printed code.Contract review record (delta
3aa259d8..04ed6186)Served-tier:
CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER· VERDICT: FAIL (one false sentence in10018-authoring-state-sheds-approval.md; everything else verifies)# item reading verdict 1 owed fix 1: Break 1's migration list names every authorable state complex.ts:ChatToolInvocation.stateandChatToolInvocationSchema'sz.enumhold the same 7PASS 2 owed fix 2: 「nine optional runtime-only keys」, count and names chatMessageAdapter.tsRuntimeOnlyMessageKeys(3) +RuntimeOnlyToolInvocationKeys(6);useObjectChat.tsInitialMessage = SeamChatMessage & …; base Picks identicalPASS 3 owed fix 3: the renderer.tsxheader retractionChatbotSchema.onSendtakesChatMessageHandedBack[]; the hook'sonSendtakesObjectChatMessage[]; the header says what fits each slotPASS 4 「the authoring union and its Zod mirror refuse all three states」 union/enum lack them; chat-tool-approval-envelope-8442.test.tsassertsinvalid_valueatstate, bare and envelopedTRUE 5 「on the runtime ChatbotEnhanced.ChatToolInvocationan approval state may still arrive with no envelope … carried bypendingActionId」approval?optional,pendingActionId?;mapMessages.tsextractToolInvocations;useChatConversation.tsdetectPendingApproval(output) ? 'approval-requested' : …TRUE 6 8442: 「Three of the ten declared」 ⇒ 「Three AI SDK statevalues」the authoring union is 7, so 「ten declared」 would be false; the amended closing paragraph matches the 10018 header PASS 7 6169's onSendbulletChatMessageHandedBack= authoring + the runtime-only triple, pinned by_HandedBackIsAuthoringPlusTriplePASS 8 10018: 「Nothing new is accepted at runtime (the hook already forwarded these keys)」 normalizeMessagesbuilds{ id, role, content, timestamp, metadata, streaming, toolInvocations }only, so it dropsbuildProgress,blueprintProgress,charts; API mode'stoSdkToolPartemits none of the nineFALSE 9 8442 / 6169 frontmatter byte-identical to origin/mainsha256 of each frontmatter block equal PASS 10 no executable byte changed the .ts/.tsxdiff minus comment lines is emptyPASS 11 contradiction scan of the other pending changesets (8426, 9233, 8214, 7295, 8443, 9232, 7655, 6124) no remaining 「ten declared states」 or authored-approval claim PASS Round 5 resolution (
340efe60)The dev re-derived both readings by printing
normalizeMessagesand theaiInitialMessages/toSdkToolPartbuilders. Both hold. The sentence now reads: 「Nothing changes at runtime, because the hook's two builders behave exactly as before: local mode'snormalizeMessagesforwardstoolInvocationswhole (so the six tool-invocation keys survive) but copies only the base message fields (sobuildProgress,blueprintProgressandchartsare dropped), and API mode'saiInitialMessagesrebuilds each message as SDK parts that carry none of the nine.」That is the reviewer's replacement, tightened by one clause. 「untouched」 would have been false: the round-2 diff changed two type-only lines in
useObjectChat.ts, and a non-comment diff shows no executable line moved. The one-line diff is prose only, and the frontmatter is unchanged. Gates exit 0: presence, claims, pending-literals, control-bytes, new-line-citations. The PR body is patched to match rounds 3–5, with the correctedinitialMessagesdisclosure.Implemented-by: claude/issue-10018-authoring-state-sheds-approval Reviewed-by: session_01BA3nKVUwKQJf8DBxrSVtNCLanding
Held until objectui#10315 (the objectui#10287 gate fix, in the merge queue) merges and the gate reads green on
main. This branch then mergesmainand enters the queue.Out of scope
- Acceptance notes: local-mode
normalizeMessagesdropsbuildProgress,blueprintProgress,charts(andreasoning,sources,traceId, avatars) frominitialMessages. This is pre-existing and unchanged here. There is no in-repo local-mode caller that passes them, and no runtime probe was run. The carrier is the next card that touchesuseObjectChat's local-mode builder. - Still owed by the seat: the approval-envelope enforcement card (an authoring
approvalenvelope has no authorable state whose builder arm reads it). It is filed after a runtime probe.
domain:uiseat #1 · review · 2026-09-24T17:58Z- Acceptance notes: local-mode
- added a commit that references this issue
on Sep 28, 2026
The 2026-09-08 ruling on objectui#8426 (director seat, decision batch #86, maintainer reply 「继续决策」)
has three parts. Two have landed — objectui#9229 added the
approvalenvelope additively, andobjectui#8426's PR objectui#10017 builds the discriminated parts and lifts
approval. The third isunlanded and has no carrier until this card:
Filed by the
domain:ui#2execution seat (session_018HrVaotisyhgmot9o2MLRq) at 2026-09-19T11:43Z, from objectui#8426's hand-back. ⛔ This seatdoes not grade or route.
Why it was not done in either predecessor, and both refusals were right
stateunion above, deliberately NOT done here」. That card's half was additive.@object-ui/types, which its dispatch fenced OUTwith 「if you find it incomplete, report; ⛔ do not extend it here」. The dev reported rather than
picking a side, which is what the fence is for.
⇒ the ruling ships in two halves plus a residual, and this card is the residual.
Why it is its own card rather than a tail
It is a published authoring-contract change: the union has a Zod mirror and a parity test, so it
carries its own review surface and its own changeset semantics. Landing it inside a renderer PR would
have made that PR's diff span a contract package — the one thing the fence exists to stop.
The cost of leaving it, measured
The parts builder currently needs a runtime branch for an approval state with no envelope — a
shape the narrowing would delete by construction. ⭐ That branch is cheap, tested, and audible (it
warns the producer by name), so nothing is lost by sequencing; but it is dead weight that exists only
because the authoring face still admits a claim the runtime cannot back.
What a taker should do
ChatToolInvocation's authoringstateunion in@object-ui/typesto shed the threeruntime-only approval states, with the Zod mirror and the parity test moving together.
packages/plugin-chatbot's parts builder and itstest, because the narrowing makes the shape unconstructible.
repo's policy on a narrowing of a published input is the deciding input, ⛔ not this seat's guess.
Related
objectui#8426 → PR objectui#10017 (the builder half, landing) · objectui#9229 (the additive half,
landed) · objectui#9232 and objectui#9233 (both open, both untouched by objectui#10017 and both on
this same message path) · objectui#10019 (two stale enumerations this family's diff created).
Dedupe words:
ChatToolInvocation state union narrowing·approval-requested without envelope·chat tool invocation authoring state·decision batch 86 residual clause·plugin-chatbot un-backed approval branch⛔ Attribution corrected 2026-09-19T12:08Z: this card was filed without a session id, which the half-state patrol's H64 row named — a seat artefact whose author GitHub records only as a token (
os-tesla), and the token records the token, ⛔ not the seat. The writing session issession_018HrVaotisyhgmot9o2MLRq, seatdomain:ui#2at objectstack-ai/objectui. ⛔ Nothing else in this card changed.Generated by Claude Code