Skip to content

feat(csharp-ci): upload the merged cobertura report as <prefix>-coverage-report - #43

Merged
monsieurleberre merged 2 commits into
devfrom
feat/csharp-ci-upload-merged-cobertura
Sep 29, 2026
Merged

monsieurleberre merged 2 commits into
devfrom
feat/csharp-ci-upload-merged-cobertura

Conversation

@monsieurleberre

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What

csharp-ci.yaml: right after Merge per-project cobertura reports, the coverage shard (if: matrix.coverage) uploads coverage/merged.cobertura.xml as artifact ${{ inputs.artifact-prefix }}-coverage-report (default csharp-coverage-report), retention-days: 1, if-no-files-found: error. Same actions/upload-artifact SHA pin (v7.0.1) as the file's other uses. README and CHANGELOG [Unreleased] / Added updated (additive, next release 2.6.0).

Why

canton-dotnet-sdk-internal is removing its separate coverage re-run. It needs the merged report to keep an "every src module appears in coverage" guard without running the tests twice.

Collisions

Name is distinct from <prefix>-coverage-percent and <prefix>-ci-result-*. scala-ci.yaml already uploads its Cobertura file (coverage-artifact-name, default scala-coverage), so no change there and no clash with csharp in the same caller run.

Checks

  • Repo tests (test/*.py, test/*_test.sh) all pass.
  • actionlint: the only findings are pre-existing job.workflow_sha complaints (3 lines) from the local actionlint version; none from the new step.
  • No consumer integration run yet; draft until an independent reviewer passes it.

@monsieurleberre
monsieurleberre marked this pull request as ready for review September 29, 2026 11:51
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ⚠️ Failed 2026-09-29T18:04:58.992372Z 0782980 New commits
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: bd97043783

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread .github/workflows/csharp-ci.yaml
@monsieurleberre
monsieurleberre merged commit 2fb50c3 into dev Sep 29, 2026
2 checks passed
@monsieurleberre
monsieurleberre deleted the feat/csharp-ci-upload-merged-cobertura branch September 29, 2026 18:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant