Utopia: run 0.1.0-re.8 (the importer reads utopia:temporal)

[gedaiu]

Bumps Utopia from re.7 to 0.1.0-re.8 (digest sha256:f8866e8c…). It puts deeplethe/utopia#1291 on the running Utopia: the ontology importer reads the utopia:temporal annotation its own export writes, so a relation in Lore's ontology can be an event or eternal instead of always a state. Utopia binds a pushed phrase by the declaration only when the relation is not a state (deeplethe/utopia#1242), so until this runs, none of Lore's mirrored phrases has been bound that way.

re.8 = re.7 + #1291 (issue deeplethe/utopia#1292), re-dev f0587718, tag v0.1.0-re.8. Before tagging: cargo fmt --check, clippy -D warnings and cargo test --workspace on the merged tree against a migrated test database, 1,615 passed and 0 failed. No new migration (still 0113).

After merge: terraform apply -target='kubernetes_deployment_v1.utopia[0]' from main. Then the ontology version stored for each mirrored repo is set back to 3, because #2790 deployed ontology v4 against re.7 and its upgrade imported every relation as a state; the next mirrored push re-imports v4 under re.8.

Related: #2790 (ontology v4, the commit mirror), #2789 (re.7).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[lore-agent]

Lore is reviewing this PR — 6dbba203-18b0-47b2-9eb8-a7f74860ca46.

Submit a review that requests changes to have Lore push a fix for it. Comment @lore review to re-run the review.

[github-actions]

🔍 Lore Spec Impact

Examined 1 changed file(s): 0 had graph data (no coupling found), 1 had none — no ingested test run covers them, so this check cannot speak for them.

_{Deterministic · graph @ 54e00aa (projected 2026-10-07) · 1 file(s) skipped: changed since the graph last saw them, so their line numbers no longer line up · no tests run by this check}

[lore-agent]

Lore review — Approved

Clean Utopia image tag and sha256 digest bump to 0.1.0-re.8.

Must fix (0) · Consider (0) · Nits (0)

Reviewed by gemini-4-argon

Submit a review that requests changes to have Lore push a fix for it. Comment @lore review to re-run the review.

Posted by floor, visit c879bedf-a6dd-4836-bcea-72f28f3eeb02.