refactor(util): decouple Result from Zod#44479
Open
zharinov wants to merge 4 commits into
Open
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
|
I asked SOTA models to analyze existing result-handling libraries in the NPM ecosystem and synthesize the refactor for one that I've written a while a go, to remove ugly parts. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes
Resultwith a structuralSafeParserinterface.wrap()andtransform().unwrapOrThrow()toError-typed result channels.For optional-field extractors, this adds the
nonNullishZod transform callback:Normal Zod integration remains available through
Result.parse(input, schema)and.parse(schema).A parser that claims to return a non-nullish value but produces
nullorundefinedat runtime is now treated as a programmer error and routed through the uncaught-error channel.Context
Please select one of the following:
AI assistance disclosure
Did you use AI tools to create any part of this pull request?
Please select one option and, if yes, briefly describe how AI was used (e.g., code, tests, docs) and which tool(s) you used.
Fable 5 assisted with planning. GPT-5.6 Sol, used through the Zed coding agent, assisted with implementation, tests, and documentation.
Documentation (please check one with an [x])
How I've tested my work (please select one)
I have verified these changes via:
The public repository: N/A