Skip to content

doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc is down #83914

Description

@camelid

I think it was working yesterday, but https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/ is giving a "Not Found" response for me. https://doc.rust-lang.org/beta/nightly-rustc/ works fine, however.

Activity

  1. added
    T-infraRelevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
    C-bugCategory: This is a bug.
    I-prioritizeIssue needs a team member to assess the impact. Will be replaced by P-{low,medium,high,critical}
    on Apr 6, 2021
  2. Mark-Simulacrum commented on Apr 6, 2021

    @Mark-Simulacrum
    Member

    Hm, I wonder if this is a similar bug to the one fixed due to link check failure during the bootstrap bump.

  3. camelid commented on Apr 6, 2021

    @camelid
    MemberAuthor

    FYI, /nightly/std works fine—it seems to just be /nightly/nightly-rustc.

  4. Mark-Simulacrum commented on Apr 6, 2021

    @Mark-Simulacrum
    Member

    Yeah, almost certainly the bootstrap bump. cc @ehuss (just a heads up, I plan to submit a patch soon, though haven't written it yet)

  5. Mark-Simulacrum commented on Apr 6, 2021

    @Mark-Simulacrum
    Member

    My guess without too much investigation is that the symlink_dir_force which intends to share the compiler-doc directory between rustdoc and rustc docs is ending up clobbered. I likely won't get around to a fix tonight but may be able to do so tomorrow, we'll see how much time I have.

  6. ehuss commented on Apr 6, 2021

    @ehuss
    Contributor

    I'm also happy to revert the change on beta, if you want, so there isn't a rush to fix things.

  7. Mark-Simulacrum commented on Apr 6, 2021

    @Mark-Simulacrum
    Member

    Yeah, I think we should do that - there's enough stuff broken in rustbuild that's not really of the too unusual kind (well, really just two cases, but they seem fairly typical). I'd rather we drop it from beta and either pursue resource-suffix as suggested by @jyn514 or at least tackle the bugs in rustbuild on a less urgent timescale before relanding. (Ideally we should figure out what people should do; rustbuild's approach to just building twice seems pretty... suboptimal; I imagine that the fix for this newly found bug will end up similar if I do it quickly).

  8. ehuss commented on Apr 6, 2021

    @ehuss
    Contributor

    OK, I have posted rust-lang/cargo#9332. I'll push through the changes, though it may take at least a few days to get beta updated and then bump the version.

  9. Mark-Simulacrum commented on Apr 6, 2021

    @Mark-Simulacrum
    Member

    Yeah. I think I'm not sure there's as easy a fix in this case (unlike the simple add of a double core build), as the clobbering occurs over two different steps I believe. So I think we'll wait for that patch to land and bump beta. (We could also temporarily remove, say, rustdoc or rustc docs - but that doesn't seem like a real benefit).

  10. added 2 commits that reference this issue on Apr 6, 2021
  11. camelid commented on Apr 8, 2021

    @camelid
    MemberAuthor

    Thanks for the speedy fix! The docs are back online now (because it's a bit after midnight UTC). I'm glad they're back :)

  12. removed
    I-prioritizeIssue needs a team member to assess the impact. Will be replaced by P-{low,medium,high,critical}
    on May 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    C-bugCategory: This is a bug.T-infraRelevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions