Competitive coding 10 done

[desaiparam]

No description provided.

[super30admin]

• Strengths:
  • Both solutions are correct and efficient, with optimal time and space complexity.
  • The code is well-commented and easy to understand.
  • The approach for buysell2.py is intuitive and captures all possible profits from upward trends.
  • The peekingiterator.py implementation correctly handles the peek functionality without advancing the iterator.
• Areas for Improvement:
  • In buysell2.py, the variable name selling could be more descriptive, such as current_profit or day_profit, to better reflect its purpose.
  • In peekingiterator.py, the print(self.nextElement) statement in the hasNext method seems unnecessary and could be removed unless it's for debugging purposes.