Add -tags llvm23 #5775

Activity

1. davecheney

   self-assigned this

   on Sep 28, 2026
2. davecheney commented on Sep 28, 2026

   

   davecheney

   on Sep 28, 2026

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   @deadprogram i'm going to noodle on this in the background. Adding llvm23 support means supporting 9 concurrent llvm versions. Would this be a time to talk about dropping llvm15, or at least removing it from the support matrix and CI?
3. deadprogram commented on Sep 28, 2026

   

   deadprogram

   on Sep 28, 2026

   Last edited by deadprogram

   Member

   More actions

   @deadprogram i'm going to noodle on this in the background. Adding llvm23 support means supporting 9 concurrent llvm versions. Would this be a time to talk about dropping llvm15, or at least removing it from the support matrix and CI?

   I think yes we can both drop and remove it.
4. davecheney commented on Sep 28, 2026

   

   davecheney

   on Sep 28, 2026

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   Do you want to align dropping llvm15 with 0.43; ie, start on it for 0.44 ?
5. deadprogram commented on Sep 28, 2026

   

   deadprogram

   on Sep 28, 2026

   Member

   More actions

   Do you want to align dropping llvm15 with 0.43; ie, start on it for 0.44 ?

   I think start with 0.44 please, since I hope we can release 0.43 very soon.
6. davecheney commented on Sep 28, 2026

   

   davecheney

   on Sep 28, 2026

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   5. > Do you want to align dropping llvm15 with 0.43; ie, start on it for 0.44 ?

   I think start with 0.44 please, since I hope we can release 0.43 very soon.
   

   🫡 SGTM. I dunno what the depreciation policy is, but maybe saying 0.43 is the last release to actively support LLVM15 in the release notes could be a thing.
7. dgryski commented on Sep 29, 2026

   

   dgryski

   on Sep 29, 2026

   Member

   More actions

   #5782

   👍React with 👍1Reacted by Dave Cheney
8. dgryski

   closed this as completedin #5782on Oct 19, 2026