Skip to content

ci: remove unused download-previous-rolldown-binaries job - #3403

Open
jong-kyung wants to merge 1 commit into
voidzero-dev:mainfrom
jong-kyung:ci/remove-unused-rolldown-binaries-job
Open

jong-kyung wants to merge 1 commit into
voidzero-dev:mainfrom
jong-kyung:ci/remove-unused-rolldown-binaries-job

Conversation

@jong-kyung

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

download-previous-rolldown-binaries was missing from done.needs. If it failed, all E2E and snapshot jobs were skipped and the required done check still passed.

The job is also unnecessary. Every consumer runs build-upstream right after downloading its artifact,
and build-upstream downloads the pinned host binding again into the same directory. So the artifact was either overwritten on Linux or never loaded on macOS and Windows.

The job uploaded an npm-latest Linux rolldown binding that every consumer
replaced immediately: build-upstream always reruns download-rolldown-binaries
and copies the pinned host binding into the same directory. Because the job
was missing from done.needs, a failure in it skipped all E2E and snapshot
jobs while the required done check still passed.

build-cli-test-binaries and cli-e2e-test-musl now gate on detect-changes
directly so docs-only changes still skip them.
@jong-kyung jong-kyung self-assigned this Nov 10, 2026
@jong-kyung

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-10T01:15:14.935983Z 427958f Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@jong-kyung jong-kyung added test: install-e2e run vite install e2e test test: sfw labels Nov 10, 2026
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 👍

Reviewed commit: 427958f532

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@jong-kyung
jong-kyung marked this pull request as ready for review November 10, 2026 01:12
@jong-kyung
jong-kyung requested a review from fengmk2 November 10, 2026 01:12

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

test: install-e2e run vite install e2e test test: sfw

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant