Skip to content

fix(ci): remove stale GemReward gitlink - #49

Draft
zedarvates wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/remove-stale-gemreward-gitlink
Draft

fix(ci): remove stale GemReward gitlink#49
zedarvates wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/remove-stale-gemreward-gitlink

Conversation

@zedarvates

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Repairs the repository-level checkout defect tracked in #48 without restoring or disclosing any submodule URL.

  • removes the stale GemReward-Service-Repo gitlink;
  • keeps the already-versioned public GemReward-Service-Staging/ tree unchanged;
  • adds a minimal actions/checkout@v4 proof workflow with contents: read only.

Canonical-state evidence

  • the gitlink was introduced in commit cdb9231 on 2026-03-08 without a matching .gitmodules entry;
  • repository history contains no .gitmodules entry for this path;
  • no tracked source or workflow references GemReward-Service-Repo;
  • the public repository already tracks the GemReward implementation under GemReward-Service-Staging/;
  • later commit 41d4225 only advanced the opaque gitlink commit and did not establish valid submodule metadata.

This makes deletion—not URL reconstruction—the smallest non-secret-bearing repair.

Validation

The PR's Repository Checkout CI job intentionally contains only actions/checkout@v4. A green run proves the repository can be checked out through the normal action without the semantic-prevalidator tarball workaround.

No private repository URL is added or exposed. No project code is changed.

Closes #48.

@sonarqubecloud

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CI: repair broken GemReward-Service-Repo submodule metadata

1 participant