feat: add shared PR workflow skills - #4
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: d8ee9f82c5
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| This applies to ordinary PRs and each PR created by a stack submission. Watch | ||
| the repository's configured reviewers, including Codex, Copilot, Claude, other | ||
| bots, and requested humans; do not stop after the first reviewer responds. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When an adopting repository has the optional @claude workflow installed but the PR contains no explicit mention, Claude does not run by policy (docs/code-review.md:3-5). This instruction nevertheless includes Claude among configured reviewers, while references/pr-review-follow-up.md:51-54 requires any not-triggered reviewer to remain pending, so an otherwise completed ordinary PR will keep its monitor alive until the 30-minute timeout. Determine expected reviewers from the reviewers actually requested or automatically triggered for this PR, rather than from installed configuration alone.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Change
Agents need shared guidance for stacked PRs and for handling reviews after opening a PR without occupying the foreground task. Add
origin89-gh-stackwith GitHub's command and recovery references, MIT license, and Origin89 branch and authorization rules. Link it from the existing working and commit skills so adopting repositories receive it through their normal skills refresh.Extend the commit skill with background review follow-up for reviews requested for a PR or covered by its automatic review triggers: check every two minutes for at most 30 minutes, verify findings against the current head, address valid feedback within the task's authorization, and clean up on completion, timeout, cancellation, or blockers. Optional mention-only integrations do not hold completion open unless invoked. Fixes and retries retain the original deadline. Add validation scenarios for both workflows.
Validation
just check: all 31 tests pass on the rebased branch, including complete skill-bundle installation and local link checks.git diff --checkpasses.Shared instructions only; no package release or Changeset is needed. Consumers receive the new guidance after merge and their next successful skills refresh.