[wan9chi]

Motivation

vp run nope#build, where no workspace package is named nope, ran nothing and exited 0 without a word. --filter nope build at least warns No packages matched the filter: nope before its pnpm-compatible exit 0. But a package#task specifier names one package on purpose, so a missing package is almost always a typo, and a CI script with that typo passed while running nothing. Turborepo errors here (Could not find package "nope" referenced by task "nope#build" in project).

Now the run fails, before anything runs:

$ vp run nope#build
error: Package 'nope' not found in the workspace

It exits 1 with nothing on stdout. A vp run nope#build inside a task's command fails the outer run's planning the same way, as a nested vp run typo already does:

error: Failed to plan tasks from `vp run nope#build` in task app#build
* Package 'nope' not found in the workspace

The same rule covers a short name that auto-completes to several scoped packages, like app for @a/app and @b/app. Before, it also ran nothing and exited 0; now it fails with the existing ambiguous-name error, which lists the packages' paths. A short name with one scoped match, like app for @test/app, still resolves.

--filter is unchanged: an unmatched filter warns and exits 0, and --fail-if-no-match makes it an error.

pkg#task specifiers already resolve through an exact-name pattern flagged unique, which errored only when several packages shared the name. The flag is now exactly_one, and the resolver also errors when that name matches no package, or several after scoped auto-completion.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

---

Note

Medium Risk
User-visible planning/CLI semantics change: mistyped package#task specifiers now fail instead of exiting 0 with no work, which fixes CI false positives but may break anyone depending on the old no-op behavior.

Overview
package#task selectors now fail fast when the package cannot be resolved to exactly one workspace package: missing names exit 1 with Package '…' not found in the workspace, and short names that scoped-auto-complete to multiple packages use the existing ambiguous-name error. This applies to top-level runs, nested vp run … in task commands, and --dry-run --json (no empty plan on stdout).

Resolution uses a renamed exactly_one flag on exact package names (formerly unique) so pkg#task paths require one match after exact and scoped lookup; --filter behavior is unchanged (warn + exit 0 unless --fail-if-no-match).

E2e and plan snapshot tests document the new errors and the filter vs specifier distinction.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit ed120e0. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[github-actions]

fspy benchmark

linux

dynamic/launch             change  +0.19%  [ -3.40% ..  +4.62%]  overhead   +57.19%
dynamic/access             change  +0.35%  [-10.52% ..  +7.83%]  overhead   +17.85%
dynamic/access-relative    change  -0.29%  [ -4.83% ..  +3.32%]  overhead   +69.98%
dynamic/access-contended   change  -5.18%  [-13.46% ..  +2.54%]  overhead   +30.05%
static/launch              change  -0.43%  [ -5.33% ..  +4.50%]  overhead  +191.94%
static/access              change  -0.22%  [ -1.58% ..  +1.82%]  overhead +1462.06%
static/access-relative     change  -0.59%  [ -2.22% ..  +0.47%]  overhead +1976.65%
static/access-contended    change  -0.61%  [ -2.91% ..  +3.05%]  overhead +1909.10%

macos

dynamic/launch             change  +0.44%  [ -3.60% ..  +4.95%]  overhead  +231.58%
dynamic/access             change  -1.23%  [-18.23% ..  +9.56%]  overhead    +4.16%
dynamic/access-relative    change  +1.14%  [-13.58% .. +22.74%]  overhead  +238.50%
dynamic/access-contended   change  +2.32%  [ -2.12% .. +43.08%]  overhead    +4.49%

windows

dynamic/launch             change  -1.05%  [ -4.22% ..  +3.20%]  overhead   +26.61%
dynamic/access             change  +0.00%  [ -0.96% ..  +0.96%]  overhead    +1.35%
dynamic/access-relative    change  +0.18%  [ -0.56% ..  +0.96%]  overhead    +1.32%
dynamic/access-contended   change  +0.18%  [ -0.73% ..  +0.91%]  overhead    +1.67%