Skip to content

feat(six-encounters): Waves 6-8 C0-C6 concentric evolution validators and master roadmap seal (#2-#58) - #69

Merged
4444J99 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/hole-loop-waves6-8-c0-c6-complete
Oct 25, 2026
Merged

4444J99 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/hole-loop-waves6-8-c0-c6-complete

Conversation

@4444J99

@4444J99 4444J99 commented Oct 25, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Implements Waves 6-8 C0 through C6 concentric evolution architecture and master roadmap evaluator (#2-#58).

Summary by Sourcery

Implement deterministic C0–C6 concentric evolution validators and a master roadmap evaluator for authored, generative, performance, platform, and institutional workflows.

New Features:

  • Add a concentric evolution validation module covering constitution and custody, playable cycles, authored editions, generative studio gating, performance participation, platform operations, and institutional delivery across C0–C6.
  • Expose the new C0–C6 validators and master roadmap evaluator through the generation API.
  • Add deterministic provenance, edition, platform, and delivery digests for validation outputs.

Enhancements:

  • Preserve historical source and chamber metadata while enforcing gated derivative writing and platform boundary policies.

Tests:

  • Add comprehensive automated coverage for C0–C6 validators, deterministic digests, historical mutation protection, and API re-exports.

@sourcery-ai

sourcery-ai Bot commented Oct 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Sorry @4444J99, you've used your own review budget of 250,000 diff characters for the last 7 days.

You can request another review in 5 days and 16 hours by commenting @sourcery-ai review. Upgrade to get a review now.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 25, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-25T12:30:42.066002Z a3c88db PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 25, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review in Change Stack →

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@sourcery-ai

sourcery-ai Bot commented Oct 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Reviewer's Guide

Introduces a browser/Node-compatible C0–C6 concentric evolution validation layer, exposes it through the existing generation API, seals outputs with canonical SHA-256 digests, and adds end-to-end tests covering each roadmap cluster and the aggregate evaluator.

Sequence diagram for the C0–C6 roadmap evaluation

sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller
    participant HLGeneration
    participant Roadmap as evaluateConcentricRoadmapC0ToC6
    participant Clusters as C0-C6 validators
    participant Digest as canonicalJSON and sha256Hex

    Caller->>HLGeneration: evaluateConcentricRoadmapC0ToC6(masterInput)
    HLGeneration->>Roadmap: evaluateConcentricRoadmapC0ToC6(masterInput)
    Roadmap->>Clusters: evaluateC0ConstitutionAndCustody(input.c0)
    Roadmap->>Clusters: verifyC1PlayableCycleAndStudies(input.c1)
    Roadmap->>Clusters: buildC2FullAuthoredEdition(input.c2)
    Roadmap->>Clusters: evaluateC3GenerativeStudioAndEditions(input.c3)
    Roadmap->>Clusters: composeC4PerformanceAndParticipation(input.c4)
    Roadmap->>Clusters: verifyC5OperatedPlatformBoundary(input.c5)
    Roadmap->>Clusters: verifyC6InstitutionalAndCommercialOperation(input.c6)
    Clusters-->>Roadmap: Cluster payloads and valid flags
    Roadmap->>Digest: canonicalJSON(payload)
    Digest-->>Roadmap: SHA-256 concentricDigest
    Roadmap-->>HLGeneration: Frozen aggregate result
    HLGeneration-->>Caller: allValid and summary
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Adds a standalone C0–C6 concentric-evolution validation module with immutable reference data, deterministic canonical hashing, frozen result payloads, and a master roadmap evaluator.
  • Defines preserved source-file and chamber provenance baselines plus literary-reference metadata.
  • Implements validators/builders for constitution and custody, playable cycles, authored editions, gated generative writing, performance participation, platform boundaries, and institutional delivery.
  • Exports browser and CommonJS APIs and re-exports all capabilities through HLGeneration.
  • Computes SHA-256 digests for cluster payloads and the aggregate roadmap result.
experimental/six-encounters/concentric-evolution.js
experimental/six-encounters/generation.js
Integrates the new concentric-evolution test suite into the package test command.
  • Adds comprehensive coverage for C0–C6 defaults, negative historical-mutation gating, API re-exports, deterministic digests, and aggregate pass/fail reporting.
  • Runs the new test file alongside the existing six-encounters, release, and accessibility suites.
experimental/six-encounters/tests/concentric-evolution.test.cjs
experimental/six-encounters/package.json

Possibly linked issues

  • #HL-005: The PR directly adds and tests a C1 six-encounter score evaluator, though import, transition, and source-ledger acceptance remain incomplete.

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@4444J99
4444J99 merged commit 96e2e0a into main Oct 25, 2026
5 of 6 checks passed
This was referenced Oct 25, 2026
This was referenced Oct 25, 2026

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: a3c88db16e

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +41 to +42
words[asciiBitLength >> 5] |= 0x80 << (24 - (asciiBitLength % 32));
words[(((asciiBitLength + 64) >> 9) << 4) + 15] = asciiBitLength;

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Include the input bytes in the browser SHA-256 implementation

When this module runs without Node's crypto, words receives only padding and the input length; the contents of ascii are never added. In a browser-like VM, sha256Hex('abc') and sha256Hex('xyz') return the same digest, which also differs from Node's SHA-256 result. Consequently, the new custody, edition, and roadmap seals cannot detect same-length content changes and are incompatible across Node and browsers. Encode the input as UTF-8 and populate the message words before padding, then test known vectors in the non-Node execution path.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment on lines +270 to +271
const valid = score.entriesCount === 6 &&
score.cycles === 2 &&

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Validate the chamber sequence rather than only its length

For an explicitly supplied sequence, the C1 validator accepts any six entries: verifyC1PlayableCycleAndStudies({chambersSequence: Array(6).fill('missing')}).valid returns true. Since cycles is calculated solely from that same length, its check adds no protection. This marks nonexistent chambers, incorrect ordering, or six visits to one chamber as a successful protected six-encounter score, and the master evaluator propagates that result as PASSED. Compare the entries against the canonical sequence in content.js before declaring C1 valid.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment on lines +312 to +315
desktopVerified: input.desktopVerified !== false,
mobileVerified: input.mobileVerified !== false,
zeroGlyphClipping: input.zeroGlyphClipping !== false,
baselineAlignmentVerified: input.baselineAlignmentVerified !== false

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Require measured evidence before claiming typography verification

Calling buildC2FullAuthoredEdition() without any browser results marks desktop, mobile, clipping, and baseline checks as verified, allowing C2 and the master roadmap to pass without rendering anything. These defaults fabricate regression evidence rather than representing an unverified edition, and the payload records no browser or font environment to bound the claims. Require actual verification results with their tested environment, and leave missing evidence unverified instead of defaulting it to success. This conflicts with the verification-claim requirement in AGENTS.md.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L19-L19

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

function verifyC1PlayableCycleAndStudies(cycleState = {}) {
const cs = (cycleState && typeof cycleState === 'object') ? cycleState : {};
const defaultSequence = ['040915', '041015', '042115', '040915', '041015', '042115'];
const chambersSequence = Array.isArray(cs.chambersSequence) ? cs.chambersSequence : defaultSequence;

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Copy the caller's sequence before freezing the validation result

When a caller supplies a mutable chambersSequence, this assignment retains the original array in score, and the final recursive freeze freezes that caller-owned array. After validation, appending to the original sequence throws a TypeError, while element updates throw in strict mode or silently fail otherwise. This makes a validation call unexpectedly prevent subsequent editing or reuse of its input, including when invoked through the master evaluator. Copy the sequence before including it in the frozen result, as the existing route-graph builder does for its chamber array.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

function freeze(o) {
if (o && typeof o === 'object') {
Object.values(o).forEach(v => {
if (v && typeof v === 'object' && !Object.isFrozen(v)) freeze(v);

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Traverse frozen containers when deep-freezing sealed payloads

The source-file and literary-reference arrays are already shallow-frozen, so this condition skips their contents and leaves their records mutable even inside the supposedly frozen C0 and C2 results. For example, assigning to evaluateC0ConstitutionAndCustody().historicalImmutability.files[0].sha256 succeeds, changes the shared baseline used by subsequent evaluations, and leaves the existing result's custody digest inconsistent with its payload. Citation records can likewise be changed through a returned edition and contaminate later editions. Traverse children even when their container is frozen, or deeply freeze these constants at construction, so sealed results cannot be modified through nested records.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant